Mathematical analogical reasoning ability based on the thinking style of junior high school students on flat surface of solid figures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v2i2.121Keywords:
Flat Surfaces of Solid Figures, Mathematical Analogical Reasoning, Thinking StyleAbstract
Analogical reasoning ability teaches students how to translate abstract concepts into a concrete ones. Students can receive and process information from this knowledge according to their thinking style. Therefore, this study aims to determine students' mathematical analogical reasoning ability at SMP Negeri 1 Sungai Raya based on their thinking style. The research method used in this research is quantitative descriptive analysis, with data analysis assisted by Anates V4 software. The subjects in this study were 29 class IX A students at SMP Negeri 1 Sungai Raya. Data collection techniques used in this study include measurement and direct and indirect communication. The instruments used were mathematical analogical reasoning tests, thinking style tests, and interview guidelines. The results showed that students who had a concrete sequential thinking style obtained an average value of mathematical analogical reasoning ability of 46.25 in the good category, while the average value of students with abstract sequential mathematical analogical reasoning ability was 31.50, concrete random 27.83, and random abstract 32.07 in the medium category. The findings mean that the classroom learning pattern needs to be maintained while improving students' mathematical analogical reasoning abilities. In addition, students are expected to maximize their potential according to the character of their thinking style.
References
Abidin, Z., Utomo, A. C., Pratiwi, V., Farokhah, L., Jakarta, U. B., & Jakarta, U. M. (2020). Project-based learning-literacy n improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities in elementary schools. JMIE (Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education), 4(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.32934/jmie.v4i1.170
Agastya, W. N., Triana, D. D., & Haribowo, H. (2022). Assessing the content and construct validity of non-cognitive skills assessment instruments for science subjects at junior high school in Indonesia. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 22(2), 118-133.
Agusantia, D., & Juandi, D. (2022). Kemampuan penalaran analogi matematis: Systematic literature review. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 7(2), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6436
Agustiana, N., Supriadi, N., & Komarudin, K. (2019). Meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematis dengan penerapan pendekatan bridging analogy ditinjau dari self-efficacy. Inovasi Pembangunan : Jurnal Kelitbangan, 7(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v7i1.117
Andiani, D., Hajizah, M. N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2021). Analisis rancangan assesmen kompetensi minimum (AKM) numerasi program merdeka belajar. Majamath: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 80-90.
Ayal, C. S., Kusuma, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Dahlan, J. A. (2016). The enhancement of mathematical reasoning ability of junior high school students by applying mind mapping strategy. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(25), 50-58.
Belousova, A. (2014). Thinking style as a factor of variable cognitive education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.167
Dewi, E. R., & Alam, A. A. (2020). Transformation model for character education of student. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1228-1237. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5155
Firdaus, A., Nisa, L. C., & Nadhifah, N. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada materi barisan dan deret berdasarkan gaya berpikir. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 10(1), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v10i1.17822
Fitriana, N. N., Agoestanto, A., & Hendikawati, P. (2019). Kemampuan penalaran matematis dan kemandirian peserta didik kelas x ditinjau dari gaya berpikir dalam pembelajaran CORE. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 452-465.
Hadiastuti, D. I., & Soedjoko, E. (2019). Analysis of mathematical representation ability based on students' thinking style in solving open-ended problems. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(3), 195-201.
Halim, A., Mahzum, E., & Irwandi, I. (2021). Student's misconception and thinking style on modern physics course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 12018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012018
Hawthorne, C., Philipp, R. A., Lamb, L. L., Bishop, J. P., Whitacre, I., & Schappelle, B. P. (2022). Reconceptualizing a mathematical domain on the basis of student reasoning: Considering teachers' perspectives about integers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 65, 100931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100931
Hidayat, E., Ratnaningsih, N., & Santika, S. (2019). Pemetaan gaya berpikir peserta didik berdasarkan kemampuan koneksi matematis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers.
Irawan, A., & Surya, E. (2017). Application of the open ended approach to mathematics learning in the sub-subject of rectangular. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(3), 270-279.
Jegatha, L., Baskaran, R., & Kannan, A. (2014). Learning styles assessment and theoretical origin in an E-learning scenario: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42, 801-819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9344-0
Kartianom, K., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Why are their mathematical learning achievements different? Re-analysis TIMSS 2015 data in Indonesia, Japan and Turkey. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 9(2), 33-46.
Maghfiroh, R. F., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2021). Penalaran analogi siswa SMA dalam pemecahan masalah pembuktian ditinjau dari perbedaan jenis kelamin. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n2.p420-432
Mariyam, M., Wahyuni, R., & Setiawan, M. A. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran visualization, auditory, kinesthetic terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 85-94. https://doi.org/10.31316/j.derivat.v6i2.505
MejÃa-RodrÃguez, A. M., Luyten, H., & Meelissen, M. R. M. (2021). Gender differences in mathematics self-concept across the world: An exploration of student and parent data of TIMSS 2015. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 1229-1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10100-x
Nurma, N. M. A., & Rahaju, E. B. (2021). Penalaran analogi siswa SMA dalam menyelesaikan soal persamaan logaritma ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n3.p339-349
Pradita, D. A. R., Maswar, M., Tohir, M., Junaidi, J., & Hadiyansah, D. N. (2021). Analysis of reflective student analogy reasoning in solving geometry problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783(1), 12105. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012105
Pramana, C., Chamidah, D., Suyatno, S., Renadi, F., & Syaharuddin, S. (2021). Strategies to improved education quality in Indonesia: A review. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3).
Qomariyah, S., & Darmayanti, R. (2023). Development of high school students' mathematical reasoning ability instruments on three dimension material. JEMS: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika dan Sains, 11(1), 249-260.
Rahmi, Y. L., Habibah, I. N., Zulyusri, Z., & Darussyamsu, R. (2021). HOTS assessment in circulatory system learning: Validity, reliability, and item quality. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia, 7(2), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.15513
Rudianto, R., Diani, R., Subandi, S., & Widiawati, N. (2022). Development of assessment instruments 4C skills (critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and creativity) on parabolic motion materials. Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v2i2.115
Safitri, D. R., Basir, M. A., & Maharani, H. R. (2021). Analisis kemampuan penalaran analogi siswa smp dalam memecahkan masalah fungsi. Prosiding Konstelasi Ilmiah Mahasiswa Unissula (KIMU) Klaster Humanoira, 595-605.
Sandy, W. R., Inganah, S., & Jamil, A. F. (2019). The analysis of students' mathematical reasoning ability in completing mathematicalproblems on geometry. Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v3i1.8423
Santi, I., Maimunah, M., & Roza, Y. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa SMK pada materi barisan dan deret di kota pekanbaru. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.31316/j.derivat.v6i2.50
Siagan, M. V, Saragih, S., & Sinaga, B. (2019). Development of learning materials oriented on problem-based learning model to improve students' mathematical problem solving ability and metacognition ability. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5717
Simamora, R. E., & Saragih, S. (2019). Improving students' mathematical problem solving ability and self-efficacy through guided discovery learning in local culture context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61-72.
Siswandari, H., Setyani, Y. L., Nurdianti, D., Asikin, M., & Ardiansyah, A. S. (2021). Telaah model problem based learning bernuansa STEM terhadap kemampuan literasi matematika menuju PISA 2022. SANTIKA: Seminar Nasional Tadris Matematika, 1, 586-611.
Susilawati, S., & Saragih, A. H. (2014). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Dan Gaya Berpikir Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan (JTP), 7(1), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.24114/jtp.v7i1.2024
Toba, R., & Noor, W. N. (2019). The current issues of Indonesian EFL students' writing skills: Ability, problem, and reason in writing comparison and contrast essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506
Utami, L. F., Pramudya, I., & Slamet, I. (2020). Students' mathematical communication skills in terms of concrete and abstract sequential thinking styles. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v11i2.7486
Veith, J. M., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2022). What group theory can do for you: From magmas to abstract thinking in school mathematics. Mathematics, 10(5), 703.
Wardhani, D. A. P., Subanji, S., & Qohar, A. (2016). Penalaran analogi siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah luas dan keliling segitiga dan segiempat. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(9), 1764-1773.
Wulandari, H. A., Utami, C., & Mariyam, M. (2021). Analisis kemampuan penalaran analogi matematis ditinjau dari motivasi belajar siswa pada materi kubus dan balok kelas IX. JPMI, 6(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v6i2.1951
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
