The Impact of ChatGPT on EFL Learners' Writing Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i3.1344Keywords:
Academic writing Criteria, Artificial Intelligence Tools, ChatGPT, EFL learner, Writing skillAbstract
EFL learners often face difficulties in constructing coherent, well-written texts. With the rapid development of AI technologies, increasing interest has emerged in their ability to support language learning, especially writing. Therefore, this study investigates the effect of using Artificial Intelligence tools, specifically ChatGPT, on EFL learners’ writing skills. Through a mixed-method approach involving written tests and a questionnaire, the study examines how ChatGPT can contribute to improving EFL students’ writing skills. Data were gathered through a questionnaire, a pre-test, and a post-test. Forty-five EFL learners participated in the questionnaire, while twenty participated in the pre-test and post-test stages. The participants were third-year students in the Department of English, College of Education for Humanities, at Al-Hamdaniya University. The results indicate significant improvements in students’ writing performance across all measured writing criteria following the ChatGPT-assisted writing activities. The findings also demonstrate that students had positive opinions about using ChatGPT to develop their English writing abilities. However, they reported various difficulties when using ChatGPT as a writing support tool. The study suggests that ChatGPT may serve as a supportive tool for EFL learners’ academic writing development, while emphasizing the important roles of teachers and learners’ independent learning.
References
Algaraady, J., & Mahyoob, M. (2023). ChatGPT’s capabilities in spotting and analyzing writing errors experienced by EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on CALL, 9, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call9.1
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Campbell, M. (2019). Teaching academic writing in higher education. Educational Quarterly Reviews, 2(3), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.92
Eckstein, G., & Bell, L. (2023). Dynamic written corrective feedback in first-year composition: Accuracy and lexical and syntactic complexity. RELC Journal, 54(3), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211061624
Fenjan, S. S. (2024). Investigating the grammatical and lexical coherence in essay writing by Iraqi EFL college students. Journal of the College of Education for Humanities, University of Thi-Qar, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.32792/jedh.v14i2.462
Gabrielatos, C. (2002). EFL writing: Product and process (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED476839). ERIC.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
Hazem, A. H., Simon, A. G., Ahmed, M. M., Rashid, B. N., & Alnoori, B. S. M. (2026). Students’ perceptions of using iPad applications to support EFL oral communication skills. Online Learning in Educational Research, 6(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i1.1052
Hong, W. C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.61414/jeti.v5i1.103
IELTS. (2023). IELTS writing band descriptors. British Council, IDP: IELTS Australia, & Cambridge Assessment English.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. TESL-EJ, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int
Kucuk, T. (2024). ChatGPT integrated grammar teaching and learning in EFL classes: A study on Tishk International University students in Erbil, Iraq. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on ChatGPT, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.6
Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2022). Syntactic and lexical complexity in L2 English academic writing: Development and competition. Ampersand, 9, Article 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100096
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Mahlow, C. (2023). Large language models and artificial intelligence, the end of (language) learning as we know it—or not quite? EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/da2rm
Mugableh, A. I. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on the development of vocabulary knowledge of Saudi EFL students. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on ChatGPT, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.18
Tack, A., & Piech, C. (2022). The AI teacher test: Measuring the pedagogical ability of Blender and GPT-3 in educational dialogues. arXiv.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and the future of mixed model research: From methodological triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage.
Teng, M. F. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a foreign language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240304
Teng, M. F. (2025). Metacognitive awareness and EFL learners' perceptions and experiences in utilizing ChatGPT for writing feedback. European Journal of Education, 60(1), Article e12811. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12811
Teng, M. F., & Huang, J. Y. T. (2026). Assessing ChatGPT feedback for EFL learners’ engagement and writing performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.70155
Valijärvi, R. L., & Tarsoly, E. (2019). Language students as critical users of Google Translate: Pitfalls and possibilities. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 12(1), 61–74.
Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970
Wolfersberger, M. (2003). L1 to L2 writing process and strategy transfer: A look at lower proficiency writers. TESL-EJ, 7(2).
Yoon, C. (2011). Concordancing in L2 writing class: An overview of research and issues. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.003
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Lexical cohesion development in English as a foreign language learners’ argumentative writing: A latent class growth model approach. Linguistics and Education, 78, Article 101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101255
Zhang, S., Zhang, H., & Zhang, C. (2022). A dynamic systems study on complexity, accuracy, and fluency in English writing development by Chinese university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 787710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787710
Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., & Machtmes, K. (2024). Mixed methods integration strategies used in education: A systematic review. Methodological Innovations, 17(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231217937
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marwa Muhammad Ahmad, Aram George Simon, Sarah A. Khuder, Ali Hussein Hazem , Mohanad Ramadhan Safar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Online Learning in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Online Learning in Educational Research agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.
License Agreement: By publishing with Online Learning in Educational Research, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.
