Demographic and Contextual Factors Associated with Teachers' Perceived TPACK: Evidence from the Maldives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i2.1236Keywords:
Educational Technology, In-service teacher, Secondary grade teacher, Small Island Developing State, TPACKAbstract
The use of digital technologies in education has increased the importance of teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). However, existing research on the effect of demographic variables on teachers’ TPACK has produced inconsistent findings, and empirical evidence from Small Island Developing States (SIDS) remains limited. This study investigated the demographic and contextual factors affecting Maldivian in-service secondary teachers’ perceived TPACK competency. A validated 29-item questionnaire was administered to 485 teachers, and the data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results revealed a generally high level of perceived TPACK across all dimensions. Significant differences were found based on frequency of technology use, teaching subject, and teacher nationality, whereas gender, age, and teaching experience showed no significant differences. Maldivian teachers teaching local subjects reported relatively lower perceptions of technological knowledge, likely due to the limited availability of subject-specific digital resources. This study contributes to the TPACK literature by providing empirical evidence from a SIDS and demonstrating that contextual factors, rather than demographic factors, have a greater influence on teachers’ perceived TPACK. The findings highlight the importance of contextualized professional development and subject-specific digital resources to support effective technology integration.
References
Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573
Abundo, M., & Palillo, D. (2025). Readiness of secondary school teachers in teaching and learning mathematics from the perspective of TPACK: Basis for in-service training program. Aloysian Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, Education, and Allied Fields, 1(2), 30–46.
Alqurashi, E., Gokbel, E. N., & Carbonara, D. (2017). Teachers’ knowledge in content, pedagogy and technology integration: A comparative analysis between teachers in Saudi Arabia and United States. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1414–1426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12514
Altun, T., & Akyıldız, S. (2017). Investigating student teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) levels based on some variables. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(5), 476–485.
Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71–88.
Barac, K., Prestridge, S., & Main, K. (2017). Stalled innovation: Examining the technological, pedagogical and content knowledge of Australian university educators. In Australian Educational Computing (Number 1).
Castéra, J., Marre, C. C., Yok, M. C. K., Sherab, K., Impedovo, M. A., Sarapuu, T., Pedregosa, A. D., Malik, S. K., & Armand, H. (2020). Self-reported TPACK of teacher educators across six countries in Asia and Europe. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3003–3019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10106-6
Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., Kajornmanee, T., & Chaipah, K. (2022). A personalized learning system-supported professional training model for teachers’ TPACK development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100064
Chandra, V., & Briskey, J. (2012). ICT driven pedagogies and its impact on learning outcomes in high school mathematics. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 7(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.2012.7.1.73
Chandra, V., Chandra, R., & Nutchey, D. (2014). Implementing ICT in schools in a developing country: A Fijian experience. In ICTs and the millennium development goals: A United Nations perspective (Vol. 9781489974396, pp. 139–159). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7439-6_9
Choudhury, S., Biswas, S., Deb, J. P., Chattopadhyay, A., Devi, A., & Boruah, A. S. (2025). Role of ICT self-efficacy and TPACK in linking AI literacy to digital transformation. Online Learning in Educational Research, 6(1), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i1.1105
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010). Relationship between math teacher candidates’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707–2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400
Ersoy, A., & Aktay, S. (2007). Prospective elementary school teachers’ ways of internet use while preparing their projects and homework. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/62176/
Gulbahar, Y., & Guven, I. (2008). A survey on ICT usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 37–51.
Guntara, Y., Hafid, T., & Sari, I. F. (2021). Does TPACK mastery affect teamwork skills? A causal-comparative study of pre-service physics teachers. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 10(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.8327
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th Edition). AnnabelAinscow.
Jang, S.-J., University, C.-Y. C., Meng, T., & Tsai, F. (2013). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, (4), 29. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.282
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Examining practicing teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science, 41(4), 793–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9249-y
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers’ perceptions of constructivist-oriented TPACK. Source: Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 185–196.
Kurniawati, D., Indrasari, N., & Ansar, F. A. (2023). Integrating TPACK in extensive listening: Teachers' experiences. Online Learning in Educational Research, 3(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v3i1.227
Liu, Q., Zhang, S., & Wang, Q. (2015). Surveying Chinese in-service K12 teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115585929
Loi, N. Van. (2021). Vietnamese high-school teachers’ perceptions of TPACK in teaching English as a foreign language. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(4), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i4.3693
Long, T., Zhao, G., Li, X., Zhao, R., Xie, K., & Duan, Y. (2020). Exploring Chinese in-service primary teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for the use of thinking tools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1812514
Luik, P., Taimalu, M., & Suviste, R. (2018). Perceptions of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) among pre-service teachers in Estonia. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 741–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9633-y
Maldives Monetary Authority. (2026). Real gross domestic product. MMA Statistics Database. Retrieved from https://database.mma.gov.mv/monthly-statistics/real/real-gross-domestic-product
Ministry of Education. (2019). Maldives education sector plan ministry of education & ministry of higher education Republic of Maldives supported by: Global partnership for education.
Ministry of Education. (2022). ICT in education master plan 2.
Ministry of Education. (2025). Digital transformation of the education system is crucial. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.mv/en/news/332/digital-transformation-of-the-education-system-is-crucial-state-minister-dr-latheef
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Nguyen, H.-N., Nguyen, H.-N., & Ngo, T. T.-T. (2026). Survey data on digital competence assessment among pre-service teachers in Vietnam. Data in Brief, 65, 112465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2026.112465
NIE. (2014). The national curriculum framework. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/education/edurights/media/docs/2cda5a0a236191e565a7e98f824f23c08b5dad32.pdf
Nirmala, P., Suhardi, I., Kaswar, A. B., Surianto, D. F., Fajar B, M., Soeharto, S., & Lavicza, Z. (2025). Enhancing computational thinking skills through digital literacy and blended learning: The mediating role of learning motivation. Online Learning in Educational Research, 5(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i1.504
Nurulsari, N., Abdurrahman, A., Suyanto, E., Distrik, I. W., & Ertikanto, C. (2023). Soft scaffolding strategy: An adaptive post-pandemic learning to facilitate prospective physics teacher's PCK. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 12(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v12i1.16071
Ortiz Colón, A. M., Izquierdo Rus, T., Rodríguez Moreno, J., & Agreda Montoro, M. (2023). TPACK model as a framework for in-service teacher training. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13279
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2012). The importance of using subject-specific technology uses to teach TPACK: A case study. In Developing Technology-Rich Teacher Education Programs: Key Issues (pp. 152–169). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0014-0.ch011
Owusu, K. A., Conner, L., & Astall, C. (2015). Assessing New Zealand high school science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(3), 345–373.
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Third). Open University Press.
Rahman, S. M. M., Krishnan, V. J., & Kapila, V. (2017). Exploring the dynamic nature of TPACK framework in teaching STEM using robotics in middle school classrooms. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings.
Rathnabai, A. S. (2024). developing competencies for technology- pedagogy integration among in-service teachers: Reflections. Indian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 350–360.
Redmond, P., & Peled, Y. (2019). Exploring TPACK among pre‐service teachers in Australia and Israel. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2040–2054. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12707
Relmasira, S. C., & Donaldson, J. P. (2025). Deep learning pedagogies enhance AI literacy in elementary students: A five-cycle implementation study. Online Learning in Educational Research, 5(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i1.720
Rouf, Md. A., & Mohamed, A. R. (2018). Secondary school english language teachers’ technological skills in Bangladesh: A case study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11444a
Sahin, I. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97–105.
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Sixth). Pearson Education Limited.
Tokmak, H. S., Incikabi, L., & Ozgelen, S. (2013). An investigation of change in mathematics, science, and literacy education pre-service teachers’ TPACK. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0040-2
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723
UNICEF. (2025). Reflections on educational practice: Maldives’ first joint sector review 2025. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/maldives/reports/reflections-educational-practice-maldives-first-joint-sector-review-2025
United Nations. (2007). New partnerships for digital education. UN News. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2007/11/241172
Waseela, A. (2022). Teachers’ TPACK and technology integration in teaching and learning: A case study in the Maldives [Queensland University of Technology].
Weinstein, D., & Riegel, C. (2025). Factors impacting teacher technology knowledge and implementation in k-12 classrooms. Educational Planning, 32(4), 148–173.
Yang, M., Jeyaraj, J. J., Ahmad, N. K., & Yang, W. (2026). Examining english as a foreign language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge framework in higher education in Guizhou, China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00374-5
Yanış, H., & Yürük, N. (2021). Development, validity, and reliability of an educational robotics based technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy scale. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1784065
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 282 pages. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aminath Waseela, Vinesh Chandra, Charisse Farr

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Online Learning in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Online Learning in Educational Research agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.
License Agreement: By publishing with Online Learning in Educational Research, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.