Reframing Feedback in EFL Paragraph Writing: Complementary Roles of Teachers and ChatGPT-3.5
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i2.1220Keywords:
academic writing, human feedback, AI-generated feedback, paragraph writingAbstract
The increasing use of generative artificial intelligence in language education has transformed written feedback practices, yet limited evidence exists regarding how teacher and AI-generated feedback differ in supporting distinct dimensions of second language writing. Most previous studies have emphasized feedback effectiveness rather than examining the complementary functions of human and AI feedback across higher-order and lower-order writing concerns. This study investigated the characteristics and functions of teacher and ChatGPT-3.5 feedback on paragraph writing produced by first-year English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students in Vietnam. Guided by Sociocultural Theory, feedback literacy, and the distinction between higher-order and lower-order concerns, the study employed an exploratory mixed-methods design. A total of 178 feedback instances generated from ten student paragraphs were analyzed using quantitative frequency analysis and qualitative thematic coding. The findings revealed that teacher feedback primarily addressed higher-order concerns, including idea development, organization, coherence, and meaning construction, whereas ChatGPT-3.5 predominantly focused on lower-order concerns such as grammar, vocabulary, and sentence structure. Students also perceived teacher feedback as more supportive for conceptual development, while valuing AI-generated feedback for its immediacy and linguistic accuracy. This study extends current understanding of AI-assisted writing by demonstrating that teacher and AI feedback perform complementary rather than competing instructional roles. The findings provide practical implications for integrating human expertise and generative AI to create balanced feedback practices that support both rhetorical development and linguistic accuracy in EFL writing instruction.
References
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, Article 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832400
Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420945845
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Choiriyah, S., Ramadhan, S., Nugroho, A., Pembangunan, H. R. P., & Muharom, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence-driven learning assessment in faculties of education: An exploratory study. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(3), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v6i3.1937
Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
Fitriani, N., & Sabarniati, S. (2019). A feedback investigation of comparing teacher and students’ preferences on writing conference in a novice EFL writing class. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 7(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v7i2.304
Hady, Y., Azkiyah, S. N., Muhbib, M., & Maswani, M. (2026). Artificial intelligence-based Arabic language learning: A systematic study of the development and challenges of pedagogical innovation. Online Learning in Educational Research (OLER), 6(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i1.976
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019). Student feedback literacy and engagement with feedback: A case study of Chinese undergraduate students. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Jannah, D. M., Huda, S., Yasin, M., Sanatang, S., Fakhri, M. M., Wahid, S. N., Kaswar, A. B., Soeharto, S., & Amukune, S. (2026). AI literacy, technical skills, and ethical awareness in predicting students’ learning performance. Online Learning in Educational Research (OLER), 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i1.565
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
Ma'arif, S., Fathoni, A. M., Suyudi, S., Yudi, U., & El Muna, N. (2025). The interplay of organizational culture, knowledge management system, and learning evaluation in improving English language skills: A mixed-method study in Indonesian pesantrens. Kharisma: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(2), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v4i2.107
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, Article 100469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469
Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2023). Student engagement with written feedback: Critical issues and way forward. RELC Journal, 55(3), 508–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221150811
Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking theory, research, and practice. Bloomsbury.
Naufalin, L. R., Indrawati, C. D. S., Indriayu, M., & Noviani, L. (2026). Bridging religiosity and digital competence: The mediating role of digital ethics in higher education. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v7i1.2455
Rafida, T., Suwandi, S., & Ananda, R. (2024). EFL students’ perception in Indonesia and Taiwan on using artificial intelligence to enhance writing skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i3.1520
Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, Article 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100816
Ranalli, J., Link, S., & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2017). Automated writing evaluation for formative assessment of second language writing: Investigating the accuracy and usefulness of feedback as part of argument-based validation. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1136407
Ranalli, J., & Yamashita, T. (2022). Automated written corrective feedback: Error-correction performance and timing of delivery. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73465
Risdianto, E., Rostika, R. A., Razak, A. Z. A., Kartika, H. A., & Fitria, J. (2025). Unveiling the dual nature of AI in grading: A systematic review of benefits and mitigation strategies for algorithmic bias. Online Learning in Educational Research (OLER), 5(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i1.695
Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024). A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research: Validity, effects and students’ engagement. ReCALL, 36(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000265
Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33(2), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/357622
Syukur, P. A., Fakhri, M. M., Firdaus, F., Putra, K. P., Adiba, F., & Arifiyanti, F. (2025). AI literacy meets ethics: Critical appraisal's mediating role in shaping ethical awareness in higher education. Online Learning in Educational Research (OLER), 5(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i1.508
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yakubu, M. A., Sain, Z. H., Lawal, U. S., Budiman, S. A., & Permana, D. (2025). Analysis of online academic writing tools usage among postgraduate students in North-west Nigeria. Kharisma: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v4i1.69
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, Article 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, Article 100586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Huynh Thi Bich Phuong, Tran Thanh Du, Nguyen Huu The
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Online Learning in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Online Learning in Educational Research agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.
License Agreement: By publishing with Online Learning in Educational Research, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.
