Augmented Reality-Supported Reading Instruction: Fostering Reading Literacy and Critical Thinking in Primary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i2.1111Keywords:
Augmented Reality , Critical Thinking , Primary School Students, Reading LiteracyAbstract
The fast-paced development in information technology has resulted in a change i The increasing integration of digital technologies into primary education has created new opportunities to strengthen literacy instruction, yet empirical evidence on how augmented reality (AR) supports both reading literacy and critical thinking among young learners remains limited. This study investigated the effectiveness of AR-supported reading instruction in enhancing primary school students’ reading literacy and critical thinking while exploring their learning experiences in technology-enhanced classrooms. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed involving 147 fifth-grade students from two primary schools in Pekanbaru, Indonesia. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-intervention assessments, followed by semi-structured interviews with selected students and teachers to explain the observed learning outcomes. The findings indicate that AR-supported instruction substantially improved students’ reading literacy and critical thinking compared with conventional classroom learning. Qualitative evidence further revealed that interactive three-dimensional visualizations, collaborative learning activities, and teacher-guided questioning promoted deeper text comprehension, active participation, and analytical reasoning throughout the learning process. This study extends current research by demonstrating that the educational value of augmented reality lies not only in its technological features but also in its capacity to facilitate meaningful instructional interactions that support higher-order cognitive development. The findings provide practical guidance for integrating augmented reality into primary literacy instruction to foster students’ reading literacy and critical thinking in digitally enriched learning environments.
References
Afanasenko, O. V., Nizhenkovska, I. V., Holovchenko, O. I., & Glushachenko, O. O. (2022). Technology-enhanced constructivist learning environment for pharmacy students. Pharmacy Education, 22(1), 778–787. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2022.221.778787
Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2020). Conceptualizing reading engagement: A multidimensional perspective. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 1–14.
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
Alkhabra, Y. A., Ibrahem, U. M., & Alkhabra, S. A. (2023). Augmented reality technology in enhancing learning retention and critical thinking according to STEAM program. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01650-w
Alkhabra, Y., Alkhateeb, A., & Alkhateeb, M. (2023). Reading comprehension difficulties among elementary school students: Cognitive and instructional perspectives. Journal of Educational Research, 116(3), 215–228.
Alramamneh, Y. S. Saqr, and S. Areepattamannil, “Investigating the relationship between parental attitudes toward reading, early literacy activities, and reading literacy in Arabic among Emirati children,” Large-Scale Assessments Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2023, https://doi.org.10.1186/s40536-023-00187-3
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman
Asadi, M., & Ebadi, S. (2024). Integrating augmented reality in EFL reading comprehension: A mixed-methods study. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 20, 023. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20023
Balalle, H. (2024). Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bursali, H., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Effect of augmented reality applications on secondary school students' reading comprehension and learning permanency. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.035
Caffrey, C., Lee, H., Withorn, T., Galoozis, E., Clarke, M., Philo, T., Eslami, J., Ospina, D., Haas, A., Kohn, K. P., Macomber, K., Clawson, H., & Vermeer, W. (2023). Library instruction and information literacy 2022. Reference Services Review, 51(3/4), 319–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-08-2023-0061
Cammies, C., Cunningham, J. A., & Pike, R. K. (2024). Not all Bloom and gloom: Assessing constructive alignment, higher order cognitive skills, and their influence on students’ perceived learning within the practical components of an undergraduate biology course. Journal of Biological Education, 58(3), 588–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2092191
Candido, V., & Cattaneo, A. (2025). Applying cognitive theory of multimedia learning principles to augmented reality and its effects on cognitive load and learning outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18, 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100678
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Sci- ence in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Chang, C.-T., Chao, W.-H., Yang, C.-Y., & Semwaiko, G. S. (2025). Evaluating the impact of augmented reality on learning outcomes in K-12 special education: A systematic review. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(4), 1167–1182. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.14.4.1167
Ferron, J. M., Kirby, M., & Lipien, L. (2023). Single-case experimental design. In H. Cooper, M. N. Coutanche, L. M. McMullen, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (Vol. 2) (2nd ed.). (pp. 747–762). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000319-033
Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001
Gopalan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903302
Hammad, R., Khan, Z., Safieddine, F., & Ahmed, A. (2020). A review of learning theories and models underpinning technology-enhanced learning artefacts. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 17(4), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-06-2020-0062
Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
Kirsch, I., & Lennon, M. (2017). PIAAC: A new design for a new era. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-017-0044-8
Kusuma, A. P., & Rahmawati, N. K. (2025). The effect of contextual teaching and learning model with ethnomathematics approach on students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking. Interdisiplinary Journal of Pedagogy and Research in Media Technology, 1(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.64268/inspire.v1i1.39
Leonia, R. ., Rolina, N., & Suyantri, E. (2025). A systematic review of scientific literacy in early childhood science learning: Approaches, methods, and media. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10576
Li, M., Lv, Y., Pu, Y., & Wu, M. (2025). Design and evaluation of children’s education interactive learning system based on human computer interaction technology. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 6135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90800-y
Li, M., Chen, S., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Digital literacy and reading engagement among elementary school students in technology-enhanced learning environments. Computers & Education, 205, 104821.
Luo, H. (2023). Editorial: Advances in multimodal learning: Pedagogies, technologies, and analytics. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1286092. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1286092
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Meng, Q., Yan, Z., Abbas, J., Shankar, A., & Subramanian, M. (2025). Human–computer interaction and digital literacy promote educational learning in pre-school children: Mediating role of psychological resilience for kids’ mental well-being and school readiness. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2248432
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Parmaxi, A., & Demetriou, A. A. (2020). Augmented reality in language learning: A state‐of‐the‐art review of 2014–2019. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12486
Pérez-Cova, M., Platikanov, S., Stoll, D. R., Tauler, R., & Jaumot, J. (2022). Comparison of multivariate ANOVA-based approaches for the determination of relevant variables in experimentally designed metabolomic studies. Molecules, 27(10), 3304. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27103304
Polat, H., Taş, N., & Yıldırım, Ö. (2025). Multimedia learning: Current themes, trends and future directions. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 31(4), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2025.2522104
Pregoner, J. D. (2024). Research approaches in education: A comparison of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. IMCC Journal of Science, 4(2), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.65931/x1r6v8n4
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Rotar, O. (2025). Beyond technology tools: Supporting student engagement in technology enhanced learning. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1617. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121617
Rusli, R. K., Martin, A. Y., Lathifah, Z. K., Monaya, N., & Yakşi, M. (2025). The impact of informative and narrative texts on Arabic language comprehension in Islamic education. International Journal of Language Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i4.70009
Safitri, D., Marini, A., Irwansyah, P., & Sudrajat, A. (2025). Transforming environmental education with augmented reality: A model for learning outcome. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101796
Sagala, P. N., & Andriani, A. (2019). Development of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) questions of probability theory subject based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025
Sari, P. M., Herlina, K., & Abdurrahman, A. (2022). Online learning with multi-representation worksheets for oral and written communication skills on light reflecting material. Online Learning in Educational Research (OLER), 2(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v2i1.122
Smith, K. N., Lamb, K. N., & Henson, R. K. (2020). Making meaning out of MANOVA: The need for multivariate post hoc testing in gifted education research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219890352
Staneviciene, E., & Žekienė, G. (2025). The use of multimedia in the teaching and learning process of higher education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 17(19), 8859. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198859
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429283895-1
Tian, X., & Ironsi, C. S. (2025). Examining the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning outcomes. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 36957. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20833-w
Twabu, K. (2025). Enhancing the cognitive load theory and multimedia learning framework with AI insight. Discover Education, 4(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00592-6
Vedrenne-gutiérrez, F., López-suero, C. C., De, A., Mora-flores, L. P., Monroy-fraustro, D., Orozco-castillo, F., Martínez-velasco, J. F., & Altamirano-, M. M. (2024). The axiological foundations of innovation in STEM education – A systematic review and ethical meta-analysis. Heliyon, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32381
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Vongkulluksn, V. W., Nishiyama, C., Rodriguez, M. C., & Michael Nussbaum, E. (2023). Critical reading of informational texts (CRIT) scaffold: Evaluating the efficacy of an instructional scaffold for reading multiple scientific texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 75, 102229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102229
Widiarni, A., Saregar, A., Diani, R., Anugrah, A., & Alimin, M. (2024). Fostering 15–16-year-old students’ social responsibility through a physics e-worksheet: An ENACT learning model intervention. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 13(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v13i2.24265
Wong, J. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2023). Leveraging learning experience design: Digital media approaches to influence motivational traits that support student learning behaviors in undergraduate online courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(3), 595–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09342-1
Wulansari, O. D. E., Zaini, T. M., Bachry, B., & Nursiyanto, N. (2025). Augmented reality for 3D geometric shapes and nets combination for Android. Indonesian Journal of Engineering and Computer Science (IJECS), 5(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijecs.v5i1.27574
Zahara, M. A., & Jupri, A. R. (2022). The effect of Microsoft PowerPoint interactive learning media application on reading comprehension skills of 3rd grade elementary school students for Indonesian language subjects. Jurnal Paedagogy, 9(3), 532. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v9i3.5383
Zainuddin, Z., Misbah, M., Mastuang, M., Qamariah, Q., Amiruddin, M. Z. B., & Rahman, N. F. A. (2025). Mapping a decade of research on artificial intelligence and augmented reality in physics education: A bibliometric analysis (2016–2025). Online Learning in Educational Research (OLER), 5(2), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i2.901
Zhang, F., Jin, C., & Fan, C. (2024). Factors influencing students' reading literacy in Morocco: A multilevel analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03575-4
Zhou, Yi, Zhou, Yuchun, & Machtmes, K. (2024). Mixed methods integration strategies used in education: A systematic review. Methodological Innovations, 17(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231217937
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Febrina Dafit, Khairil Ansari, Yusnadi Yusnadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Online Learning in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Online Learning in Educational Research agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.
License Agreement: By publishing with Online Learning in Educational Research, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.
