LifeSTEM: An Inquiry-Driven Digital Module for Scientific Literacy in Biology Teacher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i2.1107Keywords:
Inquiry- based Learning, LifeSTEM Module, Pre-service Biology Teachers, Scientific Literacy, STEM EducationAbstract
Scientific literacy is a fundamental competency for future biology teachers, yet existing STEM-based digital learning resources rarely address the interdisciplinary demands of biology teacher education. This study developed and evaluated LifeSTEM, an integrated digital learning module that combines plant anatomy, STEM learning, inquiry-based activities, and engineering design tasks to strengthen scientific literacy among pre-service biology teachers. Guided by the ADDIE instructional design framework, the study involved needs analysis, expert validation, iterative module development, and classroom implementation with 30 pre-service biology teachers using a one-group pre-test–post-test design. Data were collected through needs assessment, expert validation, scientific literacy tests, and learner response questionnaires. The findings indicate that the LifeSTEM module achieved high content validity and was positively received by students as an engaging and accessible learning resource. Its implementation substantially enhanced scientific literacy, particularly students' ability to explain scientific phenomena, interpret scientific evidence, and apply procedural knowledge within authentic biological contexts. The integration of inquiry-oriented STEM activities with interactive digital learning promoted meaningful engagement with complex biological concepts while encouraging evidence-based reasoning. This study contributes to biology teacher education by demonstrating how integrated digital instructional design can strengthen scientific literacy through contextual and inquiry-driven STEM learning, providing a transferable framework for preparing future science teachers in technology-enhanced learning environments.
References
Adeoye, M. A., Baharun, H., & Munawwaroh, I. (2025). Transformational leadership in education: Harmonising accountability, innovation and global citizenship. Kharisma: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v4i1.68
Adi, W. C., Saefi, M., & Rofi'ah, N. L. (2020). Scientific literacy skills of pre-service biology teachers based on spent years in university and contributed factors. Bioedukasi Universitas Jember, 18(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v18i2.19878
Alali, R. (2024). Enhancing 21st century skills through integrated STEM education using project-oriented problem-based learning. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 53(2), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.53205-1217
Ardiansyah, B., Ramdani, A., Hakim, A., Makhrus, M., Kamarudin, S., & Jiang, N. (2024). Natural science mini-project practicum e-module to enhance higher-order thinking, science process skills, and scientific attitudes. Online Learning in Educational Research, 5(2), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i2.877
Asrizal, A., Amanda, F., Aldilla, E., & Ulfa, J. (2023). Meta-analysis of the effect of STEM-based integrated science e-books on students’ scientific literacy. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v13i2.15654
Aumann, A., Schnebel, S., & Weitzel, H. (2024). Teaching biology lessons using digital technology: A contextualized mixed-methods study on pre-service biology teachers’ enacted TPACK. Education Sciences, 14(5), Article 538. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050538
Bernica, I., Putri, K., & Wulandari, F. (2022). Scientific literacy skill through digital media professional PDF flip-based book in elementary school. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2266–2271. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2181
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Budiarto, M. K. (2023). Project-based learning model to support 21st century learning: Case studies in vocational high schools. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(4), 662–670. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i4.63806
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: Are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z
Çeliker Ercan, G., & Çubukçu, Z. (2021). Development of teachers’ curriculum implementation approaches scale: A validity and reliability study. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 50, 1464–1490. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.932497
Coenders, F., & Verhoef, N. (2019). Lesson study: Professional development (PD) for beginning and experienced teachers. Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1430050
Dalaila, I., Widiyaningrum, P., & Saptono, S. (2022). Developing e-module based on socio-scientific issues to improve students’ scientific literacy. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 11(3), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v10i1.54500
Dalimunthe, H. A., Partino, R., Suud, F. M., & Bashori, K. (2025). Gratitude as a mediator between self-efficacy and prosocial behavior: Implications for teacher education management. Kharisma: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.59373/kharisma.v4i2.106
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Farikah, Mulyani, M., Astuty, & Cahyaningrum, A. (2022). Learning case and project-based model methods: Challenges and opportunities. Dwija Cendekia: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v6i3.68120
Fauzi, A., Rosyida, A., Rohma, M., & Khoiroh, D. (2021). The difficulty index of biology topics in Indonesian senior high school: Biology undergraduate students’ perspectives. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.16538
Fayanto, S., Ulfa, S., Praherdhiono, H., Shinta, N. D., Takda, A., Sahara, L., & Balulu, N. (2023). Design of Exophysics: Book-based mobile application for literacy learning in the remote access areas of Indonesia. Journal of Learning for Development, 10(3), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v10i3.846
Fuadi, H., Robbia, A. Z., Jamaluddin, J., & Jufri, A. W. (2020). Analisis faktor penyebab rendahnya kemampuan literasi sains peserta didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122
García- Carmona, A. (2020). From inquiry-based science education to the approach based on scientific practices. Science & Education, 29(2), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00108-8
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada Barber, A. M., Davis, M. H., Scafiddi, N. T., & Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hasanah, F. N. (2023). Optimalisasi kompetensi pedagogik calon guru PAI melalui implementasi flipped classroom berbasis Moodle pada microteaching. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i2.448
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Indriyani, V., Triana, H., Nurjanah, A., & Putri, D. A. (2024). Game-oriented problem exploration (GOPE) model in language learning: A teacher’s view. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5254–5264. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5988
Jannah, M., Oviana, W., Hayati, Z., Hidayat, R., Usman, J., & Noris, M. (2025). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ science process skills through open-ended and guided inquiry-based learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(2), 1235–1262. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i2.1174
Kang, M. O., & Park, B. J. (2019). Factors influencing choosing teaching as a career: South Korean preservice teachers. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(3), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09579-z
Kind, V. (2016). Preservice science teachers’ science teaching orientations and beliefs about science. Science Education, 100(1), 122–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21194
Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2020). Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12412
Lederman, N. G. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 600–620). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267-41
Ledesma, C. M., Krepsky, L. M., & Borges, E. M. (2019). Using a flatbed scanner and automated digital image analysis to determine the total phenolic content in beer. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(10), 2315–2319. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b01037
Maiyanti, A. A., Huda, S., Anggraini, A., Laili, U. F., Muniroh, L., & Umam, R. (2025). Transformation of physics learning: Integrating virtual laboratories to improve students' scientific literacy skills. Online Learning in Educational Research, 5(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i1.661
Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9581-2
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, Article 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Nuangchalerm, P. (2018). Investigating views of STEM primary teachers on STEM education. Kimiya-ye Iranian Journal of Chemistry Research, 27(2), 208–215.
Nurjanah, S., Istiyono, E., Widihastuti, W., Iqbal, M., & Kamal, S. (2023). The application of Aiken’s V method for evaluating the content validity of instruments that measure the implementation of formative assessments. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(2), 125–133.
Nurulsari, N., Nisa’, K., Viyanti, V., & Yassine, B. (2023). HOTS-oriented student worksheets with blended learning: Improving students’ science process skills. Online Learning in Educational Research, 3(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v3i1.228
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
Otaya, L. G., Yahiji, K., & Rasimin, R. (2025). Assessment of teachers’ ability to develop HOTS-based test items: A GRM analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(3), 1995–2018. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i3.1555
Oye, N. D., & Salleh, M. (2012). E-learning methodologies and tools. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 3(2), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2012.030208
Patonah, S., Budiati, I., & Hayat, M. S. (2025). Practicality of STEAM–SDGs-based IPAS learning for vocational students in the green economy era. Online Learning in Educational Research, 5(2), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i2.884
Prasasti, R. D., & Anas, N. (2023). Pengembangan media digital berbasis flipbook untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis pada peserta didik. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(3), 694–705. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i3.589
Pratama, H., Puspitasari, Y. D., & Maduretno, T. W. (2025). Science literacy through STEM-based project-based learning model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(7), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.11306
Prihatiningtyas, S., Shofiyah, N., Yunus, S., Ma’arif, I., & Putra, I. (2025). Enhancing science literacy through flipbook-based STEM Qur’an e-modules: A case study in Islamic boarding schools. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05054-w
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1
Riani, S. (2023). Class XI students in the subject of economics inflation. Jurnal Ilmiah Nizamia, 5(2), 83–94.
Sari, I. J., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2025). STEM literacy-oriented bioinformatics education through the development of E-BIMO for pre-service biology teachers in the 21st century. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00836-5
Sari, K., Rusfandi, R., & Herawati, S. (2024). Exploring the use of game-based ice-breaking activities by English teachers during the teaching and learning process. Journal of English Language and Education, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v9i6.584
Sarini, P., Widodo, W., Sutoyo, S., & Suardana, I. N. (2024). Scientific literacy profile of prospective science teacher students. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(4), 1026–1039. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i4.627
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229
Sole, F. B. (2021). Implementation of STEM-based learning for strengthening science literacy of students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(Special Issue), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1266
Spencer, A. (2024). Cyber science education within STEM. Cyber Security and Innovative Technology Journal, 2(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.52889/citj.v2i2.330
Stinken- Rösner, L., Hofer, E., Rodenhauser, A., & Abels, S. (2023). Technology implementation in pre-service science teacher education based on the transformative view of TPACK: Effects on pre-service teachers’ TPACK, behavioral orientations and actions in practice. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 732. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070732
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Triplett, W. J. (2023). Impact of technology integration in STEM education. Cyber Security and Innovative Technology Journal, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.52889/citj.v1i1.295
Umamah, N., Zulfikar, F., Hilmiah, A., Hartono, F., & Shodiq, P. (2025). Development of digital teaching materials based on differentiated learning assisted by artificial intelligence to improve students’ historical literacy. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 11(3), 1043–1057. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i3.16735
Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2013). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12029
Wahab, M., Wasis, W., & Yuliani, Y. (2023). Profile of junior high school students’ scientific literacy. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i2.292
Wulansari, O. D. E., Zaini, T. M., Bachry, B., & Nursiyanto. (2025). Augmented reality for 3D geometric shapes and nets combination for Android. Indonesian Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 5(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijecs.v5i1.27574
Yulando, S., Sutopo, S., & Chi, T. (2019). Electronic module design and development: An interactive learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-10-4
Yulianti, D., & Masiroh, F. (2024). The implementation of learning physics with the STEM-PBL approach to Newton’s law materials and its application for character development. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 13(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v13i2.18750
Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis rendahnya literasi sains peserta didik Indonesia: Hasil PISA dan faktor penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v13i1.283
Zinnurain. (2021). Pengembangan e-modul pembelajaran interaktif berbasis Flip PDF Corporate Edition pada mata kuliah manajemen diklat. Academia: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Akademik, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.51878/academia.v1i1.546
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iing Dwi Lestari, Evi Amelia, Rifki Survani, Desi Eka Nur Fitriana, Mila Ermila Hendriyani, Dwi Ratnasari, Ika Rifqiawati, Indah Juwita Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Online Learning in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Online Learning in Educational Research agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.
License Agreement: By publishing with Online Learning in Educational Research, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.
