From Reading Comprehension to Critical Literacy: Adapting Huh's Model in Online Indonesian EFL Classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i2.1087Keywords:
critical literacy, Instructional model, Online classroom, Reading comprehensionAbstract
ritical literacy has become an essential component of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading instruction, yet its implementation remains challenging in online learning environments where students often struggle to move beyond literal comprehension toward critical engagement with texts. Although Huh’s instructional model provides a structured framework for developing critical literacy, evidence regarding its adaptation to online EFL contexts remains limited. This study investigated how an adapted version of Huh’s model supported the development of reading comprehension and critical literacy in an online Indonesian EFL classroom. Employing collaborative classroom action research, the study involved 21 undergraduate students across three iterative instructional cycles. Data were collected through reading assessments, students’ digital artifacts, and structured online classroom observations, and analyzed using descriptive statistics alongside Miles and Huberman’s interactive qualitative analysis. The findings indicate that the adapted model progressively strengthened students’ reading comprehension and critical literacy by integrating scaffolded learning activities, explicit instruction in critical literacy concepts, locally relevant sociopolitical texts, and student-generated critical questioning. The iterative refinement of instructional practices also encouraged students to engage more critically with multiple perspectives and develop evidence-based responses to authentic social issues. This study extends Huh’s framework by demonstrating how context-sensitive pedagogical adaptations can effectively support critical literacy development in online EFL settings. The findings offer practical guidance for designing online reading instruction that integrates critical pedagogy with meaningful local contexts while fostering students’ critical engagement with contemporary societal issues.
References
Amgott, N. (2018). Critical literacy in #DigitalActivism: Collaborative choice and action. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(5), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-05-2018-0060
Angelides, P., Evangelou, M., & Leigh, J. (2005). Implementing a collaborative model of action research for teacher development. Educational Action Research, 13(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790500200288
Aviyanti, L., Fratiwi, N. J., Nurdini, N., Salam, A., & Nawas, A. (2025). Can multiple-choice items measure critical thinking in socio-scientific environmental issues? Evidence from a global warming assessment of Grade 10 students using Rasch analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 14(2), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v14i2.28194
Bacon, C. K. (2017). Multilanguage, multipurpose: A literature review, synthesis, and framework for critical literacies in English language teaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(3), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X17718324
Balıkcıoğlu Akkuş, G., & Uysal, H. H. (2024). Empowering tomorrow’s educators: Critical literacy journeys of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202429986
Bowker, M. H. (2010). Teaching students to ask questions instead of answering them. Thought & Action: The NEA Higher Education Journal, 26(1), 127–134.
Briceño, A., & Rodriguez-Mojica, C. (2022). “It made me see what kind of teacher I want to be:” Critical literacy in a pre-service literacy methods course. Action in Teacher Education, 44(4), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2022.2108162
Cho, H. (2014). Enacting critical literacy: The case of a language minority preservice teacher. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(5), 677–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12066
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge.
Degener, S., & Berne, J. (2017). Complex questions promote complex thinking. The Reading Teacher, 70(5), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1535
Eshach, H., Dor-Ziderman, Y., & Yefroimsky, Y. (2014). Question asking in the science classroom: Teacher attitudes and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9451-y
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004
Gustine, G. G., & Insani, H. N. (2019). English students’ experience of reframing narrative stories from a critical literacy perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15254
Halimah, Sumiyadi, Mulyati, Y., & Damaianti, V. S. (2020). Critical literacy approach in the teaching of literary appreciation using Indonesian short stories. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i1.24992
Huang, S. (2011). Reading “further and beyond the text”: Student perspectives of critical literacy in EFL reading and writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00017
Huh, S. (2016). Instructional model of critical literacy in an EFL context: Balancing conventional and critical literacy. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 13(3), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2016.1154445
Janks, H. (2013). Critical literacy in teaching and research. Education Inquiry, 4(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i2.22071
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 567–605). Sage Publications.
Keneman, M. (2016). Empowering the foreign language learner through critical literacies development. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 12(2).
Kuki, S., Mallett, C. J., Mizushima, J., & Rynne, S. B. (2025). Learning trajectories of high-performance teacher-coaches in Japanese high schools: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Coaching and Sports Science, 4(2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.58524/jcss.v4i2.634
Kuo, J. M. (2014). Critical literacy in the EFL classroom: Evolving multiple perspective through learning tasks. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(4), 109–138.
Kurniawati, N., Sugaryamah, D., & Hasanah, A. (2020). Proposing a model of critical literacy program for fostering Indonesian EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.15084
Lam, K. Y. (2022). Engaging with critical literacy through restorying: A university reading and writing workshop on fairy-tale reimaginations. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 35(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1979577
Lam, K. Y., & Putri, E. W. (2024). A study on the affordances of digital fairy-tale rewriting: A critical literacy approach to digital multimodal composing. System, 127, 103536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103536
Lau, S. M. C. (2013). A study of critical literacy work with beginning English language learners: An integrated approach. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2013.753841
Lau, S. M. C. (2019). Convergences and alignments between translanguaging and critical literacies work in bilingual classrooms. Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts, 5(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00025.lau
Lee, Y. J. (2017). First steps toward critical literacy: Interactions with an English narrative text among three English as a foreign language readers in South Korea. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415599048
Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further notes on the four resources model. Reading Online, 3(4).
Mambu, J. E. (2023). Embedding Sustainable Development Goals into critical English language teaching and learning. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 20(1), 46–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2099863
McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2011). Critical literacy as comprehension: Understanding at deeper levels. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 278–282). Routledge.
Mettetal, G. (2002). The what, why and how of classroom action research. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 6–13.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Novianti, N., Thomas, A., & To, V. (2020). Addressing challenges in the practice of critical literacy in EFL classrooms: A new framework. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i1.25049
Nurhidayat, N., Fadillah, N., Dilla, S., Syahrul, S., & Surianto, D. F. (2025). K-means-based behavioral segmentation of social media users for digital communication analysis in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 5(2), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijecs.v5i2.28749
Olin-Scheller, C., & Tengberg, M. (2017). Teaching and learning critical literacy at secondary school: The importance of metacognition. Language and Education, 31(5), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1305394
Saiphet, P. (2025). Scrutinizing critical literacy pedagogy in the institutionally developed foundation English textbooks for Thai undergraduate students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(2), 821–842. https://doi.org/10.70730/ICAF1806
Setyaningsih, E. (2019). Bringing critical literacy into tertiary EFL reading class. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20220
Suh, Y. M., & Huh, S. (2023). An EFL model of critical literacies: Adapted and reshaped from previous studies. English Teaching, 78(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.78.4.202312.323
Suhono, S., Cahyono, B. Y., Eliyanah, E., Hidayati, M., Pratama, R. D., Sahyoni, S., & Hidayatullah, M. H. (2025). Digital literacy and digital competence among EFL teachers: A systematic literature review. Online Learning in Educational Research, 5(2), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i2.798
Susilowaty, S., Setyarini, S., & Gustine, G. G. (2025). “When a fox desires to be yuman”: Exploring English teacher’s practice of critical literacy instruction: Lessons learned from an Indonesian junior high classroom. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 24(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-12-2024-0184
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Vasquez, V. M., Janks, H., & Comber, B. (2019). Critical literacy as a way of being and doing. Language Arts, 96(5), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.58680/la201930093
Weng, T. (2023). Creating critical literacy praxis: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. RELC Journal, 54(1), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220982665
Wibowo, G. A., & Saliman, S. (2025). Gamification in online learning: A systematic review of engagement and learning outcomes in digital education. Online Learning in Educational Research, 5(2), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v5i2.733
Yan, L., Isaacs, D. S., Litts, B. K., Tehee, M., Baggaley, S., & Jenkins, J. (2023). Learning with the land: How sixth graders restory interactions with the land through field experiences. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100754
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dian Resty Pratiwi Ahmad, Utami Widiati, Ekaning Dewanti Laksmi, Siti Muniroh, Dewi Masitho Istiqomah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Online Learning in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Online Learning in Educational Research agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.
License Agreement: By publishing with Online Learning in Educational Research, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.
