HCI-Informed STEM Mini-Projects for Critical Thinking in Technology-Enhanced Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v6i3.1070Keywords:
Critical thinking, Human-computer interaction, Mini project-based learning, STEM, Technology-enhanced learning usabilityAbstract
Developing critical thinking in technology-enhanced learning requires more than access to digital platforms; it also depends on how students interact with digital environments while engaging in authentic problem solving. This study examined changes in students’ critical thinking following participation in HCI-informed STEM mini-project learning that integrated usability, interactivity, and user experience into Learning Management System (LMS)-supported activities. A quantitative pre-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design was employed with undergraduate Science Education students. Critical thinking was assessed using an essay-based test covering interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, and explanation. The findings showed an overall improvement in critical thinking performance following the learning activities, with the magnitude of improvement varying across students. The STEM mini-projects engaged students in problem analysis, solution design, prototyping, testing, evaluation, and scientific explanation, while HCI principles supported their interaction with the digital learning environment. These findings provide preliminary empirical support for integrating HCI considerations into LMS-supported STEM mini-project learning as a promising approach to facilitating critical-thinking processes. However, because the study did not include a comparison group and HCI dimensions were not independently measured, the observed improvement cannot be attributed specifically to the HCI-informed approach. Further controlled studies are needed to establish its effectiveness and clarify the contribution of individual HCI dimensions.
References
Alkair, S., Ali, R., Abouhashem, A., Aledamat, R., Bhadra, J., Ahmad, Z., Sellami, A., & Al-Thani, N. J. (2023). A STEM model for engaging students in environmental sustainability programs through a problem-solving approach. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 22(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2023.2179556
Almusharraf, A. I. (2024). An investigation of university students’ perceptions of learning management systems: Insights for enhancing usability and engagement. Sustainability, 16(22), 10037. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210037
AlZahrani, A., & AlOtaibi, H. (2024). A proposed unit based on the STEM approach: Developing 21st-century skills among middle-school students. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(2), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0046
Bellaera, L., Weinstein-Jones, Y., Ilie, S., & Baker, S. T. (2021). Critical thinking in practice: The priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856
Borck, C. R. (2020). “I belong here.”: Culturally sustaining pedagogical praxes from an alternative high school in Brooklyn. The Urban Review, 52(2), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00536-z
Chang, C.-C., & Yen, W.-H. (2023). The role of learning style in engineering design thinking via project-based STEM course. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(4), 1125–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1957776
Chen, C.-M., Li, M.-C., & Tu, C.-C. (2024). A mixed reality-based chemistry experiment learning system to facilitate chemical laboratory safety education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(4), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10101-3
Conway-Smith, B., & West, R. L. (2025). Metacognition in HCI: Designing systems for planning and flexibility. In [Book title not provided] (pp. 176–187). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92967-0_12
Cooksey, R., & McDonald, G. (2019). How do I scope, shape and configure my research project? In Surviving and thriving in postgraduate research (pp. 417–501). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7747-1_12
da Silva Junior, D. P., Duarte, E. F., Pereira, R., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2026). Phenomenological concepts and methods for HCI research. In [Book title not provided] (pp. 395–400). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-05008-3_73
Duran, M., & Dökme, İ. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on students’ critical-thinking skills. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
Grierson, A. L., Gallagher, T. L., & St Hilaire, R. (2024). Forging the role of the digital technology coach: Flexibility, responsiveness, and resourcefulness in supporting teacher professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 50(1), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2038657
Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher-developed engineering materials, design-based STEM integration curricular. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 6(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Kerby, D. S. (2014). The simple difference formula: An approach to teaching nonparametric correlation. Comprehensive Psychology, 3, 11.IT.3.1. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.IT.3.1
Kim, Y. (2021). The problem/project-based learning (PBL/PjBL) at online classes. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 162–167.
Lehong, S., van Biljon, J., & Sanders, I. (2024). Usability requirements for learning management systems in open distance electronic learning environments: Considering lecturers’ views on students’ needs. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(3), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2121205
Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating higher-order, critical, and critical-analytic thinking in problem- and project-based learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x
Ogunyemi, A. A., Lamas, D., Lárusdóttir, M. K., & Loizides, F. (2019). A systematic mapping study of HCI practice research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(16), 1461–1486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1541544
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching critical thinking? New directions in science education. Perspectives on Science Curriculum Journal.
Özkül, H. (2025). Identifying the entrepreneurship and problem-solving skills of fourth-grade students through engineering design-based STEM activities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1220. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05612-2
Pinar, F. I. L., Panergayo, A. A. E., Sagcal, R. R., Acut, D. P., Roleda, L. S., & Prudente, M. S. (2025). Fostering scientific creativity in science education through scientific problem-solving approaches and STEM contexts: A meta-analysis. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-025-00137-9
Rajaram, K. (2023). Authentic learning digital transformation and innovations. In Learning intelligence: Innovative and digital transformative learning strategies (pp. 217–302). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9201-8_6
Recabarren, M., Zeballos, L., Tan, J., & Sánchez, M. T. (2025). The role of technology and engineering education in STEM integration: Insights from an online professional development program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-10038-7
Sailer, M., Maier, R., Berger, S., Kastorff, T., & Stegmann, K. (2024). Learning activities in technology-enhanced learning: A systematic review of meta-analyses and second-order meta-analysis in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 112, 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102446
Santhosh, M., Farooqi, H., Ammar, M., Siby, N., Bhadra, J., Al-Thani, N. J., Sellami, A., Fatima, N., & Ahmad, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis to gauge the effectiveness of STEM informal project-based learning: Investigating the potential moderator variables. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10063-y
Septiyanto, A., Rusyati, L., Suhendi, E., Kaniawati, I., & Prima, E. C. (2025). Solar cells project on STEM-design thinking to foster students’ creative thinking skills, creative dispositions, and creative product. SN Social Sciences, 5(10), 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01196-5
Shaw, A., Liu, O. L., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., Li, G., Hu, S., Yu, N., Ma, L., Guo, F., Su, Q., Shi, J., Shi, H., & Loyalka, P. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Validating the Russian HEIghten® critical thinking assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1933–1948. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672640
Simon, P. D., Jiang, J., Fryer, L. K., King, R. B., & Frondozo, C. E. (2025). An assessment of learning management system use in higher education: Perspectives from a comprehensive sample of teachers and students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(2), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09734-5
Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing “science practice” in learning settings. Science Education, 99(6), 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21191
Tomitsch, M., Janssen, A., Curwood, J. S., & Thomson, K. (2021). Insights into the interrelationship between the design process and user practice: A case study on user engagement in a platform for professional learning. Enterprise Information Systems, 15(10), 1546–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1856416
Tsai, M.-H., & Tang, Y.-C. (2017). Learning attitudes and problem-solving attitudes for blended problem-based learning. Library Hi Tech, 35(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-06-2017-0102
Womser-Hacker, C. (2024). Accessible human-computer interaction (pp. 497–512). https://doi.org/10.57088/978-3-7329-8775-7_25
Xing, W., Li, H., Kim, T., Zhu, W., & Song, Y. (2025). Investigating the behaviors of core and periphery students in an asynchronous online discussion community using network analysis and topic modeling. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 5561–5588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13038-7
Zhang, W., Guan, Y., & Hu, Z. (2024). The efficacy of project-based learning in enhancing computational thinking among students: A meta-analysis of 31 experiments and quasi-experiments. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 14513–14545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2
Zhou, D., Li, H., Sima, Y., Han, Y., & Shi, F. (2025). Improving middle school students’ collaborative problem-solving competence in project-based learning through instant feedback in science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2496427
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 An Nuril Maulida Fauziah, Tutut Nurita, Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur, Dyah Astriani, Khusaini, angela boey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Online Learning in Educational Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Online Learning in Educational Research agree to the following terms:
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work without any restrictions.
Publishing Rights: Authors retain the right to publish and distribute their work without any restrictions.
License Agreement: By publishing with Online Learning in Educational Research, authors agree that their work will be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This license allows others to share and adapt the work, provided that appropriate credit is given, any changes are indicated, and the new creations are licensed under the same terms.
