Design thinking–mediated joyful learning through AI-interactive media: An applied study on enhancing higher-order thinking skills in secondary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v5i2.779Keywords:
AI-Interactive Learning Media, Design Thinking Pedagogy, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Joyful Learning Approach, Secondary EducationAbstract
Background: The growing demand for higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in secondary education has exposed the limitations of conventional instructional media that remain procedural, teacher-centered, and cognitively shallow. Although digital learning tools are increasingly adopted, many fail to explain how pedagogical mechanisms such as design thinking and joyful learning interact with AI-assisted media to produce meaningful cognitive gains.
Aims: This study aims to examine the role of design thinking as a mediating pedagogical mechanism within AI-interactive learning media to enhance students’ higher-order thinking skills.
Methods: An applied research and development study was conducted using an ADDIE framework integrated with design thinking stages. Sixty secondary school students were assigned to experimental and control groups. Data were collected through expert validation instruments, HOTS tests aligned with revised Bloom’s taxonomy, observation sheets, and student response questionnaires. Quantitative analyses included validity indices, N-gain scores, and independent sample t-tests, supported by qualitative thematic interpretation.
Results: The AI-interactive media demonstrated high validity and practicality. Students in the experimental group achieved a high N-gain score (0.76), significantly outperforming the control group. Improvements were consistent across HOTS levels, particularly in creative and evaluative thinking, supported by strong engagement indicators associated with joyful learning features.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that design thinking–mediated joyful learning, when operationalized through AI-interactive media, functions as a cognitive scaffold rather than merely a technological enhancement. This approach systematically promotes deeper reasoning, learner autonomy, and sustained cognitive engagement. The study offers an applied pedagogical model that extends beyond media development by explaining the mechanism through which AI-supported interactivity amplifies higher-order thinking. These results provide robust empirical evidence for integrating design thinking and joyful learning as foundational principles in future educational technology design and applied learning research.
References
Affandy, H., Sunarno, W., & Suryana, R. (2024). Integrating creative pedagogy into problem-based learning: The effects on higher order thinking skills in science education. 53, 101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101575
Agustira, D., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Lestari, S. R., & Pratiwi, R. T. (2025). Development of a project based learning model with multiliteracy pedagogic content to improve critical thinking skills, problem solving skills, decision making skills, and environmental literacy. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(3), 2402–2412. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i3.5812
Arifin, Z., Sukarmin, Saputro, S., & Kamari, A. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15988
Bennett, L., & Abusalem, A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Potential Impact on the Future of Higher Education. Athens Journal of Education, 11(3), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.11-3-2
Cheng, E. C. K. (2025). Pedagogies Involving the Use of AI Generative Tools for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Institutions. In Signals and Communication Technology: Vol. Part F1122 (pp. 87–103). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-96855-6_5
Chezan, L. C., McCammon, M. N., Drasgow, E., & Wolfe, K. (2022). The Ecological Validity of Research Studies on Function-Based Interventions in Schools for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Behavior Modification, 46(1), 202–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445520964921
Chong, S. W., & Isaacs, T. (2023). An Ecological Perspective on Classroom‐Based Assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1558–1570. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3201
Closa, C. (2021). Planning, implementing and reporting: Increasing transparency, replicability and credibility in qualitative political science research. European Political Science, 20(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-020-00299-2
Dishon, G. (2024). Designed to Death? The Tensions Underpinning Design in Educational Discourse. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(1), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00409-5
Galimova, E. G., Sergeeva, O. V., Zheltukhina, M. R., Sokolova, N. L., Zakharova, V. L., & Drobysheva, N. N. (2025). Mobile learning in science education to improve higher-order thinking skills and communication skills: Scoping review. Frontiers in Communication, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1624012
Gkintoni, E., Antonopoulou, H., Sortwell, A., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Challenging cognitive load theory: The role of educational neuroscience and artificial intelligence in redefining learning efficacy. 15(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020203
Hawk, H. (2025). Unlocking the potential: Enhancing higher-order thinking skills in accounting education. Accounting Education, 34(6), 998–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2024.2375600
Lagrutta, R., Santarsiero, F., Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2025). Technology-enhanced learning spaces: Shaping innovation in society 5.0. 29(10), 3247–3280. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2024-0246
Lazou, C., & Tsinakos, A. (2023). Critical immersive-triggered literacy as a key component for inclusive digital education. 13(7), 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070696
Lubbe, A., Marais, E., & Kruger, D. (2025). Cultivating independent thinkers: The triad of artificial intelligence, Bloom’s taxonomy and critical thinking in assessment pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 30(12), 17589–17622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13476-x
Mayer, S., & Schwemmle, M. (2025). The impact of design thinking and its underlying theoretical mechanisms: A review of the literature. Creativity and Innovation Management, 34(1), 78–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12626
Papé, T. L., & Maree, D. J. (2023). A systematic exploratory review investigating the relationship between working memory and emotion regulation: Implications for working memory training. South African Journal of Psychology, 53(4), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/00812463231186347
Ren, X., & Wu, M. L. (2025). Examining Teaching Competencies and Challenges While Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. TechTrends, 69(3), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01055-3
Sasson, I., & Tifferet, S. (2025). Enhancing Undergraduate Metacognitive Awareness and Self-Efficacy: Effective Instructional Practices for Research Question Formulation. European Journal of Education, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12888
Schniedermann, A. (2022). Shaping the qualities, values and standards of science. How reporting guidelines improve the transparency of biomedical research. 7, 846822. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2022.846822
Tan, C.-S., Nasir, H., Pheh, K.-S., Cong, C. W., Tay, K.-W., & Cheong, J.-Q. (2022). The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between executive functioning deficits and employee well-being. 19(20), 13386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013386
Verganti, R., Dell’Era, C., & Swan, K. S. (2021). Design thinking: Critical analysis and future evolution. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12610
Wei, R., You, Y., Liang, Z., & Cho, T. (2025). Analysing the Limitations of Bauhausian Pedagogies in Contemporary Design Education From a Neuroscience Perspective. International Journal of Art and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12616
Wu, X.-Y., & Chen, J.-B. (2025). Trends, Themes, and Innovations in Technology-Enhanced Learning: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Study. Sage Open, 15(4), 21582440251385845. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251385845
Zou, L., Zhang, Z., Mavilidi, M., Chen, Y., Herold, F., Ouwehand, K., & Paas, F. (2025). The synergy of embodied cognition and cognitive load theory for optimized learning. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-025-02152-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alfha Edison, Ida Dwijayanti, F.X. Didik Purwosetiyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
