Symmetries of the equilateral triangle mediated by geogebra: a proposal for training rural mathematics teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v5i1.562Keywords:
Dynamic Geometry, Equilateral Triangle, GeoGebra, Group Theory, Mathematics EducationAbstract
Background: The equilateral triangle is a fundamental object in geometry, notable for its symmetrical properties, which are best understood through dynamic visualization. Traditional methods often fall short in making these concepts accessible, especially in rural educational contexts with limited resources.
Aims: This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of GeoGebra software as a mediating tool to enhance rural mathematics teacher training, particularly in understanding the symmetries of equilateral triangles.
Methods: Employing a qualitative and descriptive methodology, the research collected data through classroom observations, analysis of participants’ digital constructions using GeoGebra, and reflective interviews. These methods were chosen to capture how pre-service teachers engage with geometric concepts via dynamic tools.
Results: The results demonstrated that GeoGebra significantly improves the visualization of geometric transformations such as rotations and reflections. Participants reported increased comprehension and engagement due to the interactive nature of the software. The teaching approach also encouraged deeper geometric reasoning and fostered the ability to connect abstract group theory with concrete visual representations.
Conclusion: The use of GeoGebra in rural teacher training is not only feasible but transformative. As a free, accessible platform, it bridges gaps caused by resource limitations and aligns well with local educational realities. The software empowers future educators to adopt student-centered approaches that make geometry both meaningful and contextually relevant. This proposal supports the integration of digital tools in teacher education and provides a replicable model for similar contexts globally. Future research should investigate broader applications of GeoGebra across other geometric topics and assess its long-term impact on classroom practice in rural environments.
References
Armstrong, M. A. (1988). Symmetries of the Tetrahedron. In J. H. Ewing, F. W. Gehring, & P. R. Halmos (Eds.), Groups and Symmetry (pp. 1–5). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4034-9_1
Avsec, S., Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, M., Żabicka, A., Gawlak, A., & Gil-Mastalerczyk, J. (2023). Leveraging systems thinking, engagement, and digital competencies to enhance first-year architecture students’ achievement in design-based learning. Sustainability, 15(20), 15115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015115
Chehlarova, N., & Gachev, G. (2023). Figures With An Axis Of Symmetry With Photon Robot. Symmetry: Culture & Science, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.26830/symmetry_2023_3_333
Hall, A. O., & Bastos, N. R. O. (2024). String art with repeating decimals. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 18(3–4), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2024.2386645
Happel, M. F., Deliano, M., Handschuh, J., & Ohl, F. W. (2014). Dopamine-modulated recurrent corticoefferent feedback in primary sensory cortex promotes detection of behaviorally relevant stimuli. Journal of neuroscience, 34(4), 1234-1247. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1990-13.2014
Hershkovitz, A., Daniel, E., Klein, Y., & Shacham, M. (2023). Technology integration in emergency remote teaching: Teachers’ self-efficacy and sense of success. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12433–12464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11688-7
Hershkovitz, A., Noster, N., Siller, H.-S., & Tabach, M. (2024). Learning analytics in mathematics education: The case of feedback use in a digital classification task on reflective symmetry. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(4), 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01551-5
Hohenwarter, M., Kovács, Z., & Recio, T. (2019). Using automated reasoning tools to explore geometric statements and conjectures. Proof technology in mathematics research and teaching, 215-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28483-1_10
Jesionkowska, J., Wild, F., & Deval, Y. (2020). Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education; A case study. Education Sciences, 10(8), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080198
Joglar Prieto, N., Sordo Juanena, J. M., & Star, J. R. (2014). Designing Geometry 2.0 learning environments: A preliminary study with primary school students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 396–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.837526
Klein, F. (1893). A comparative review of recent researches in geometry. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 2(10), 215–249. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1893-00147-X
Kovács, D. P., Batatia, I., Arany, E. S., & Csányi, G. (2023). Evaluation of the MACE force field architecture: From medicinal chemistry to materials science. Journal of Chemical Physics, 159(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0155322
Lepore, M. (2024). A holistic framework to model student’s cognitive process in mathematics education through fuzzy cognitive maps. Heliyon, 10(16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35863
Oke, A. E., & Aliu, J. (2025). Strategies for the implementation of environmental economic practices for sustainable construction in a developing economy. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(5), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2024.2338689
Oner, D. (2016). Tracing the change in discourse in a collaborative dynamic geometry environment: From visual to more mathematical. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9227-5
Putra, P. D. A., Sulaeman, N. F., Supeno, & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Exploring Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Using the Engineering Design Process in a Physics Classroom. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00640-3
Miftach Fakhri, M., Naufal, M. A., Machmud, M. T., Fadhilatunisa, D., Arifiyanti, F., & Soeharto, S. (2025). From games to gains using geogebra: Investigating microgames and augmented reality in affecting student motivation, confidence and problem-solving strategies in learning mathematics. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13620-7
Schwarz, B. B., Prusak, N., Swidan, O., Livny, A., Gal, K., & Segal, A. (2018). Orchestrating the emergence of conceptual learning: A case study in a geometry class. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9276-z
Thapa, R., Dahal, N., & Pant, B. P. (2022). GeoGebra Integration in High School Mathematics: An Experiential Exploration on Concepts of Circle. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(5), 16-33.
Tran, C., Smith, B., & Buschkuehl, M. (2017). Support of mathematical thinking through embodied cognition: Nondigital and digital approaches. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0053-8
Vedrenne-Gutiérrez, F., Altamirano-Bustamante, M. M., Monroy-Fraustro, D., de Hoyos Bermea, A., & Lopez-Suero, C. (2021). Teaching sciences and mathematics – A challenge for higher education institutions: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(2), 689–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3259
Weyl, H. (1952). Gravitation and electricity. The Principle of Relativity, 201–216.
Wussing, H. (1984). The genesis of the abstract group concept. Trans. by A. Shenitze. Cambridge, MA: Dover Publications, Inc. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262231091/the-genesis-of-the-abstract-group-concept/
Yorganci, S., & Subasi, M. (2025). Interactive GeoGebra applets to improving students’ learning performance in e-book-based learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 5477–5500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13021-2
Zhang, Y., Wang, P., Jia, W., Zhang, A., & Chen, G. (2025). Dynamic visualization by GeoGebra for mathematics learning: A meta-analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(2), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2250886
Zulnaidi, H., & Zamri, S. N. A. S. (2017). The Effectiveness of the GeoGebra Software: The Intermediary Role of Procedural Knowledge on Students’ Conceptual Knowledge and Their Achievement in Mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2155–2180. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01219
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
