Policy network fragmentation and the conflict paradox in metropolitan traffic governance: Evidence from greater Bandung, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i2.1290Keywords:
Collaborative Governance, Conflict Paradox, Metropolitan Traffic Governance, Policy Network Fragmentation, Regional CoordinationAbstract
Background: Traffic congestion in the Greater Bandung Metropolitan Area (KMBR) has evolved into a complex governance challenge characterized by a “conflict paradox,” in which localized traffic interventions unintentionally generate congestion spillovers across administrative boundaries. Despite regular intergovernmental coordination, congestion remains persistent across the metropolitan region.
Aims: This study examines how policy network fragmentation contributes to the conflict paradox and assesses the effectiveness of collaborative governance in metropolitan traffic management.
Method: A descriptive-explorative qualitative approach was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with transportation officials from five jurisdictions within the KMBR and complemented by regulatory document analysis, including West Java Provincial Regulation No. 12 of 2014. The analysis was guided by Van Waarden’s policy network framework and Ansell and Gash’s collaborative governance model.
Results: The findings reveal that metropolitan traffic governance is constrained by fragmented institutional structures, asymmetric power relations, and predominantly non-binding coordination mechanisms. Although coordination forums occur regularly, collaboration remains procedural rather than strategic. The prevalence of parochial ego-sectoralism encourages jurisdictions to prioritize local political and budgetary interests, causing traffic interventions to shift congestion problems across boundaries and reinforce the conflict paradox.
Conclusion: Traffic congestion in the KMBR is fundamentally a governance issue rooted in policy network fragmentation and collaborative failure. Strengthening metropolitan governance through legally enforceable and integrated coordination mechanisms is essential for achieving sustainable regional mobility.
References
Alamoudi, M., Imam, A., Majrashi, A., Osra, O., & Hegazy, I. (2024). Integrating intelligent and sustainable transportation systems in Jeddah: A multidimensional approach for urban mobility enhancement. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 19, 1301–1314. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctae078
Alem, G. (2021). Urban plans and conflicting interests in sustainable cross-boundary land governance: The case of national urban and regional plans in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063081
Anthony Jnr, B. (2023). Sustainable mobility governance in smart cities for urban policy development: A scoping review and conceptual model. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(3), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2023-0109
Beghelli, S., Guastella, G., & Pareglio, S. (2020). Governance fragmentation and urban spatial expansion: Evidence from Europe and the United States. Review of Regional Research, 40(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-019-00136-0
Bianchi, C., Nasi, G., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2021). Implementing collaborative governance: Models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review, 23(11), 1581–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1878777
Bokolo, A. J. (2025). Examining sustainable mobility planning and design for smart urban development in metropolitan areas. Urban Science, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9080314
Brattström, A., & Faems, D. (2020). Interorganizational relationships as political battlefields: How fragmentation within organizations shapes relational dynamics between organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 63(5), 1591–1620. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0038
Canitez, F. (2020). Transferring sustainable urban mobility policies: An institutional perspective. Transport Policy, 90, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.02.005
Ceder, A. (2021). Urban mobility and public transport: Future perspectives and review. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 25(4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2020.1799846
Chekero, T. (2023). Borders and boundaries in daily urban mobility practices of refugees in Cape Town, South Africa. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 42(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdad008
Choudhury, P. (2022). Geographic mobility, immobility, and geographic flexibility: A review and agenda for research on the changing geography of work. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 258–296. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0242
Christensen, I. (2024). Understanding tradeoffs in the institutional design and leadership of collaborative governance. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(2), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2023.2283583
Costumato, L. (2021). Collaboration among public organizations: A systematic literature review on determinants of interinstitutional performance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(3), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2020-0069
Creutzig, F. (2021). From smart city to digital urban commons: Institutional considerations for governing shared mobility data. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 1(2), Article 025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac0a4e
Damurski, L., & Andersen, H. T. (2022). Towards political cohesion in metropolitan areas: An overview of governance models. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 56, 43–62. https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2022-0012
de Wee, G., & Jakoet-Salie, A. (2025). Policy integration for overcoming fragmented government action in South Africa: The case of the National Policy on Food and Nutrition Security. Politics & Policy, 53(1), Article e70018. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.70018
Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M., & Westerwinter, O. (2022). The global governance complexity cube: Varieties of institutional complexity in global governance. The Review of International Organizations, 17(2), 233–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09449-7
Faiyetole, A. A., & Adewumi, V. A. (2024). Urban expansion and transportation interaction: Evidence from Akure, southwestern Nigeria. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231169427
Faude, B., & Fuss, J. (2020). Coordination or conflict? The causes and consequences of institutional overlap in a disaggregated world order. Global Constitutionalism, 9(2), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381719000376
Ferry, M. (2021). Pulling things together: Regional policy coordination approaches and drivers in Europe. Policy and Society, 40(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1934985
Filippi, F. (2022). A paradigm shift for a transition to sustainable urban transport. Sustainability, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052853
Freemark, Y., Steil, J., & Thelen, K. (2020). Varieties of urbanism: A comparative view of inequality and the dual dimensions of metropolitan fragmentation. Politics & Society, 48(2), 235–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220908966
Frohlich, M., Fidelman, P., Dutton, I., Haward, M., Head, B. W., Maynard, D., Rissik, D., & Vince, J. (2023). A network approach to analyse Australia’s blue economy policy and legislative arrangements. Marine Policy, 151, Article 105588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105588
Gao, Y., & Zhu, J. (2022). Characteristics, impacts and trends of urban transportation. Encyclopedia, 2(2), 1168–1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2020078
Hattke, F., & Martin, H. (2020). Collective action during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Germany’s fragmented authority. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(4), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1805273
Hossain, R., Kamruzzaman, L., Taylor, E., & Alizadeh, T. (2026). Enhancing land use and transport integration: Towards a new infrastructure governance framework. Transport Reviews, 0(0), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2026.2635018
Hu, Y., Xu, Q., Field, B., Xia, B., & Wu, G. (2024). Governing collaborative networks in mega transport projects development: Integrative findings from 34 cases worldwide. Transport Policy, 150, 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.03.013
Hui, I., & Smith, G. (2022). Private citizens, stakeholder groups, or governments? Perceived legitimacy and participation in water collaborative governance. Policy Studies Journal, 50(1), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12453
Jiang, S., Keyvan-Ekbatani, M., & Ngoduy, D. (2023). Partitioning of urban networks with polycentric congestion pattern for traffic management policies: Identifying protected networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 38(4), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12895
Karimi, H., Ghadirifaraz, B., Shetab Boushehri, S. N., Hosseininasab, S.-M., & Rafiei, N. (2022). Reducing traffic congestion and increasing sustainability in special urban areas through one-way traffic reconfiguration. Transportation, 49(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10162-4
Karlsson, I. C. M., Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Smith, G., Koglin, T., Kronsell, A., Lund, E., Sarasini, S., & Sochor, J. (2020). Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service: A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.028
Kim, R. E. (2020). Is global governance fragmented, polycentric, or complex? The state of the art of the network approach. International Studies Review, 22(4), 903–931. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz052
Kim, S. Y., Swann, W. L., Weible, C. M., Bolognesi, T., Krause, R. M., Park, A. Y. S., Tang, T., Maletsky, K., & Feiock, R. C. (2022). Updating the institutional collective action framework. Policy Studies Journal, 50(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12392
Kitchin, R., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2021). Fragmented governance, the urban data ecosystem and smart city-regions: The case of Metropolitan Boston. Regional Studies, 55(12), 1913–1923. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1735627
Kreuder-Sonnen, C., & Zürn, M. (2020). After fragmentation: Norm collisions, interface conflicts, and conflict management. Global Constitutionalism, 9(2), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381719000315
Krishnan, S. R. (2023). Decision-making processes of public sector accounting reforms in India: Institutional perspectives. Financial Accountability & Management, 39(1), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12294
Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., Chávez, D. A., Tubbeh, R., Sotés, J., & Perla, J. (2020). Climate change policy networks: Connecting adaptation and mitigation in multiplex networks in Peru. Climate Policy, 20(3), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1730153
Mavlutova, I., Atstaja, D., Grasis, J., Kuzmina, J., Uvarova, I., & Roga, D. (2023). Urban transportation concept and sustainable urban mobility in smart cities: A review. Energies, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083585
McNaught, R. (2024). The application of collaborative governance in local level climate and disaster resilient development: A global review. Environmental Science & Policy, 151, Article 103627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103627
Metz, F., & Brandenberger, L. (2023). Policy networks across political systems. American Journal of Political Science, 67(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12699
Moore-Cherry, N., Kayanan, C. M., Tomaney, J., & Pike, A. (2022). Governing the metropolis: An international review of metropolitanisation, metropolitan governance and the relationship with sustainable land management. Land, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050761
Mystakidis, A., Koukaras, P., & Tjortjis, C. (2025). Advances in traffic congestion prediction: An overview of emerging techniques and methods. Smart Cities, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8010025
Nabiafjadi, S., Sharifzadeh, M., & Ahmadvand, M. (2021). Social network analysis for identifying actors engaged in water governance: An endorheic basin case in the Middle East. Journal of Environmental Management, 288, Article 112376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112376
Oden, M., & Sciara, G. C. (2020). The salience of megaregional geographies for inter-metropolitan transportation planning and policy making. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 80, Article 102262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102262
Oden, M., & Sciara, G.-C. (2025). Searching for a spatial fix: Patterns of inter-metropolitan collaboration in transportation planning and policy-making. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 45(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X231156524
Olivier, T., & Schlager, E. (2022). Rules and the ruled: Understanding joint patterns of institutional design and behavior in complex governing arrangements. Policy Studies Journal, 50(2), 340–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12429
Osei Kwadwo, V., & Skripka, T. (2022). Metropolitan governance and environmental outcomes: Does inter-municipal cooperation make a difference? Local Government Studies, 48(4), 771–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1958785
Patil, D. S., Bailey, A., Yadav, U. N., George, S., Helbich, M., Ettema, D., & Ashok, L. (2022). Contextual factors influencing the urban mobility infrastructure interventions and policies for older adults in low- and middle-income countries: A realist review. BMC Public Health, 22(1), Article 1489. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13875-6
Perez, M., von Schnurbein, G., & Gehringer, T. (2022). Mitigating health policy fragmentation through interlocks: The networks between American and Swiss public-private partnerships. Health Policy, 126(11), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.08.013
Rauf, M. A., & Weber, O. (2022). Housing sustainability: The effects of speculation and property taxes on house prices within and beyond the jurisdiction. Sustainability, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127496
Reinsberg, B., & Westerwinter, O. (2021). The global governance of international development: Documenting the rise of multi-stakeholder partnerships and identifying underlying theoretical explanations. The Review of International Organizations, 16(1), 59–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09362-0
Roman, M., Varga, H., Cvijanovic, V., & Reid, A. (2020). Quadruple Helix models for sustainable regional innovation: Engaging and facilitating civil society participation. Economies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8020048
Sadabadi, A. A., Rahimirad, Z., & Nikijoo, I. (2024). Enhancing cross-sector partnerships in energy saving through social entrepreneurship: A social network analysis approach. Energy Research & Social Science, 109, Article 103412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103412
Sanderink, L., & Nasiritousi, N. (2020). How institutional interactions can strengthen effectiveness: The case of multi-stakeholder partnerships for renewable energy. Energy Policy, 141, Article 111447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111447
Sattler, C., & Schröter, B. (2022). Collective action across boundaries: Collaborative network initiatives as boundary organizations to improve ecosystem services governance. Ecosystem Services, 56, Article 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101452
Schuster, J., Jörgens, H., & Kolleck, N. (2021). The rise of global policy networks in education: Analyzing Twitter debates on inclusive education using social network analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 36(2), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1664768
Sciara, G.-C., Waxman, A., & Buchanan, R. (2024). State legislator views on funding 21st century transportation: Important problems, missed connections. Transport Policy, 150, 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.02.021
Skuzinski, T., Weinreich, D. P., & Velandia Hernandez, C. (2024). How can we better study the links between regional governance and public service outcomes? Governance topologies in metropolitan public transportation systems. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(3), 1448–1463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X221074061
Sørensen, C. H., Hansson, L., & Rye, T. (2023). The role of meta-governance in public transport systems: A comparison of major urban regions in Denmark and England. Transport Policy, 130, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.018
Soujaa, I., Nukpezah, J. A., & Benavides, A. D. (2021). Coordination effectiveness during public health emergencies: An institutional collective action framework. Administration & Society, 53(7), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720985440
Stephenson, P. (2023). Exploring the throughput legitimacy of European Union policy evaluation: Challenges to transparency and inclusiveness in the European Commission’s consultation procedures and the implications for risk regulation. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14(2), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.33
Sundram, P. (2025). Network governance in ASEAN: Fostering regional cooperation and integration. Frontiers in Political Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1434595
Suo, L., Li, X., & Cao, S. (2023). How governance boundaries affect regional collaboration on atmospheric governance: Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Delta. Review of Policy Research, 40(4), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12541
Trein, P., Biesbroek, R., Bolognesi, T., Cejudo, G. M., Duffy, R., Hustedt, T., & Meyer, I. (2021). Policy coordination and integration: A research agenda. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 973–977. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13180
Ukeje, I. O., Suzana, O. R., Ejem, E. N., Akor, I. C., Aloh, J. N., Arinze, A. I., & Nwangbo, S. O. (2026). Stakeholder engagement and policy legitimacy in agricultural development: A dynamic stakeholder governance innovation perspective from Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2026.2641816
Ulibarri, N., Emerson, K., Imperial, M. T., Jager, N. W., Newig, J., & Weber, E. (2020). How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison. Policy and Society, 39(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1769288
van Geet, M. T., Verweij, S., Busscher, T., & Arts, J. (2021). The importance of policy design fit for effectiveness: A qualitative comparative analysis of policy integration in regional transport planning. Policy Sciences, 54(3), 629–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09429-z
Wang, M., Fu, X., Zhang, D., Chen, F., Liu, M., Zhou, S., Su, J., & Tan, S. K. (2023). Assessing urban flooding risk in response to climate change and urbanization based on shared socio-economic pathways. Science of the Total Environment, 880, Article 163470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163470
Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2021). Four decades of public participation in risk decision making. Risk Analysis, 41(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13250
Wegner, D., & Verschoore, J. (2022). Network governance in action: Functions and practices to foster collaborative environments. Administration & Society, 54(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211024580
Yang, H., Huang, W., Yang, D., & Jiang, Y. (2025). Innovation in comprehensive transportation network planning in the context of national spatial development: Institutional constraints and policy responses. Land, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/land14051046
Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O.-L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K–12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w
Yue, W., Li, C., Mao, G., Cheng, N., & Zhou, D. (2021). Evolution of road traffic congestion control: A survey from perspective of sensing, communication, and computation. China Communications, 18(12), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.23919/JCC.2021.12.010
Zeng, C., Yin, Y., Guo, L., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., & Huang, Z. (2024). Integrating the administrative spillover effect into the spatial governance system to revisit land development: A study in urban-rural fringe areas of Wuhan and neighboring cities, China. Land Use Policy, 139, Article 107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107060
Zhou, H., & Gao, H. (2020). The impact of urban morphology on urban transportation mode: A case study of Tokyo. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(1), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.07.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pringgo Dwiyantoro, Deni Nugraha, Tuntun Salamatun Zen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
