Development and evaluation of an animation-assisted e-module to enhance students’ mathematical understanding in three-dimensional geometry learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i2.1193Keywords:
Animation Assisted E-Module, Dimensional Geometry, Educational Technology, Mathematics Learning, Three Learning EffectivenessAbstract
Background: Rapid advancements in science and technology have significantly influenced various sectors, including education. In mathematics learning, the integration of technology through animation-assisted e-modules offers a promising approach to enhance interactivity and facilitate students’ understanding of abstract concepts.
Aims: This study aims to develop and evaluate an animation-assisted e-module for teaching three-dimensional geometry to eighth-grade students.
Method: This research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate). The study was conducted at SMP Negeri 3 Purbalingga during the 2024/2025 academic year, involving experimental and control groups. Data were collected through interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. Quantitative analysis was used to assess the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of the developed e-module, including an independent samples t-test after meeting normality and homogeneity assumptions.
Results: The findings revealed that the e-module achieved a high level of validity based on expert evaluations. The practicality test showed an average score of 3.43 (out of 4.00), indicating a very practical category based on responses from teachers and students. Furthermore, the effectiveness test demonstrated a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (Sig. 2-tailed = 0.000 < 0.05), confirming the positive impact of the e-module on students’ learning outcomes.
Conclusion: The animation-assisted e-module is valid, highly practical, and effective, making it a feasible instructional medium for improving students’ understanding of three-dimensional geometry.
References
Ahdhianto, E., Marsigit, Haryanto, & Santi, N. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive-based contextual learning model on fifth-grade students’ problem-solving and mathematical communication skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 753–764. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.753
Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
Al-Amri, S., Hamid, S., Noor, N. F. M., & Gani, A. (2023). A framework for designing interactive mobile training course content using augmented reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(20), 30491–30541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-14561-4
Alenezi, M., Wardat, S., & Akour, M. (2023). The need of integrating digital education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782
Almusharraf, A. I. (2024). An investigation of university students’ perceptions of learning management systems: Insights for enhancing usability and engagement. Sustainability, 16(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210037
Alyusfitri, R., Gistituati, N., Yerizon, Fauzan, A., & Yarman. (2024). The effectiveness and relationship of student responses toward learning outcomes using interactive multimedia-based e-modules in elementary schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 16(5), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2024.354
Asad, M. M., Hussain, N., Wadho, M., Khand, Z. H., & Churi, P. P. (2021). Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: An empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0103
Asad, M. M., & Qureshi, A. (2025). Impact of technology-based collaborative learning on students’ competency-based education: Insights from the higher education institution of Pakistan. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 15(3), 562–575. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-07-2024-0202
Awang, L. A., Yusop, F. D., & Danaee, M. (2024). Insights on usability testing: The effectiveness of an adaptive e-learning system for secondary school mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14621
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 023108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023108
Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? The Internet and Higher Education, 45, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
Bos, R., & Wigmans, M. (2025). Dynamic visualization in animated mathematics videos: Students’ experiences and learning outcomes. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 32(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v32.1.03
Bozkurt, A. (2022). A retro perspective on blended/hybrid learning: Systematic review, mapping and visualization of the scholarly landscape. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2022(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.751
Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420945845
Chang, H.-Y., Chang, Y.-J., & Tsai, M.-J. (2024). Strategies and difficulties during students’ construction of data visualizations. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00463-w
Chirinda, B., Ndlovu, M., & Spangenberg, E. (2021). Teaching mathematics during the COVID-19 lockdown in a context of historical disadvantage. Education Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040177
Cirneanu, A.-L., & Moldoveanu, C.-E. (2024). Use of digital technology in integrated mathematics education. Applied System Innovation, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7040066
Cong, L., & Ironsi, C. S. (2025). Integrating mobile learning and problem-based learning in improving students action competence in problem-solving and critical thinking skills. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1238. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05397-4
Delıta, F., Berutu, N., & Nofrıon, N. (2022). Online learning: The effects of using e-modules on self-efficacy, motivation and learning outcomes. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(4), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1182760
Demir, C. G., & Önal, N. (2021). The effect of technology-assisted and project-based learning approaches on students’ attitudes towards mathematics and their academic achievement. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3375–3397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10398-8
Dintarini, M., Fuad, Y., & Budiarto, M. T. (2024). Examining undergraduate students’ abstraction of conic sections in a dynamic geometry environment. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 717–734. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp717-734
Drijvers, P., & Sinclair, N. (2024). The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: Purposes and perspectives. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 56(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x
Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 56(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Farrokhnia, M., Meulenbroeks, R. F. G., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Student-generated stop-motion animation in science classes: A systematic literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(6), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09857-1
Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2021). Developing, enacting and evaluating a learning experience design for technology-enhanced embodied learning in math classrooms. TechTrends, 65(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00543-y
Gopinathan, S., Kaur, A. H., Veeraya, S., & Raman, M. (2022). The role of digital collaboration in student engagement towards enhancing student participation during COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116844
Hackenberg, A. J., Creager, M., & Eker, A. (2021). Teaching practices for differentiating mathematics instruction for middle school students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1731656
Heber, S., Grasl, M. C., & Volf, I. (2023). A successful intervention to improve conceptual knowledge of medical students who rely on memorization of disclosed items. Frontiers in Physiology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1258149
Hsu, S.-K., & Hsu, Y. (2025). Supporting young learners in learning geometric area concepts through static versus dynamic representation and imagination strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(2), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10481-3
Hurrell, D. (2021). Conceptual knowledge or procedural knowledge or conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge: Why the conjunction is important to teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.4
İbili, E., Çat, M., Resnyansky, D., Şahin, S., & Billinghurst, M. (2020). An assessment of geometry teaching supported with augmented reality teaching materials to enhance students’ 3D geometry thinking skills. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1583382
Jacinto, H., & Carreira, S. (2023). Knowledge for teaching mathematical problem-solving with technology: An exploratory study of a mathematics teacher’s proficiency. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12464
Kravchenko, O., Dokuchaieva, V., Valentieva, T., Sbitnieva, L., & Chornobryva, N. (2023). The use of technology-based model of critical thinking development to reshape students’ self-study process. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.281
Laksmi, N. K. P., Yasa, I. K. A., & Mirayani, K. A. M. (n.d.). The use of animation video as learning media for young learner to improve EFL students’ motivation in learning English.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: The effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910
Machaba, F., Sibanda, A., & Vojo George, F. (2024). Grade 8 learners’ perceptions and misconceptions on their learning of surface area and volume in mathematics. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 13, 377–400. https://doi.org/10.53615/2232-5697.13.377-400
Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
Medina Herrera, L. M., Juárez Ordóñez, S., & Ruiz-Loza, S. (2024). Enhancing mathematical education with spatial visualization tools. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1229126
Milenkova, V., & Lendzhova, V. (2021). Digital citizenship and digital literacy in the conditions of social crisis. Computers, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10040040
Mjenda, M., Mutarutinya, V., & Owiti, D. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of computer-aided instructional techniques in enhancing students’ 3D geometry spatial visualization skills among secondary school students in Tanzania. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 613–637. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.31
Mou, T.-Y. (2023). Science learning with designed animation: Investigation of primary school children’s attitudes toward science learning, animation integration, and understanding level. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100246
Mutodi, P., & Mosimege, M. (2021). Learning mathematical symbolization: Conceptual challenges and instructional strategies in secondary schools. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 35, 1180–1199. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v35n70a29
Nkundabakura, P., Nsengimana, T., Nyirahabimana, P., Nkurunziza, J. B., Mukamwambali, C., Dushimimana, J. C., Uwamariya, E., Batamuliza, J., Byukusenge, C., Nsabayezu, E., Twahirwa, J. N., Iyamuremye, A., Mbonyiryivuze, A., Ukobizaba, F., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2023). Usage of modernized tools and innovative methods in teaching and learning mathematics and sciences: A case of 10 districts in Rwanda. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11379–11400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11666-z
Nuryadi, M. H., & Widiatmaka, P. (2023). Strengthening civic literacy among students through digital literacy in Society 5.0. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 17(2), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i2.20746
Ozkan, G., & Umdu Topsakal, U. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of STEAM education on students’ conceptual understanding of force and energy topics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 39(4), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1769586
Palinussa, A. L., Tupamahu, P. Z., Sabandar, V. P., Makaruku, Y. H., & Sabandar, J. (2025). Realistic mathematics education: Mathematics e-modules in improving student learning outcomes. Infinity Journal, 14(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p45-64
Peng, R., Razak, R. A., & Halili, S. H. (2023). Factors influencing in-service teachers’ technology integration model: Innovative strategies for educational technology. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0286112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286112
Ploetzner, R., Berney, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2020). A review of learning demands in instructional animations: The educational effectiveness of animations unfolds if the features of change need to be learned. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 838–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12476
Pozas, M., Löffler, P., Schnotz, W., & Kauertz, A. (2020). The effects of context-based problem-solving tasks on students’ interest and metacognitive experiences. Open Education Studies, 2(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2020-0118
Rahimi, R. A., & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: Navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00303-4
Rohendi, D., & Wihardi, Y. (2020). Learning three-dimensional shapes in geometry using mobile-based augmented reality. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(9), 48. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i09.13035
Selfa-Sastre, M., Pifarré, M., Cujba, A., Cutillas, L., & Falguera, E. (2022). The role of digital technologies to promote collaborative creativity in language education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828981
Setiadi, D., Nurhayati, S., Ansori, A., Zubaidi, M., & Amir, R. (2023). Youth’s digital literacy in the context of community empowerment in an emerging Society 5.0. Society, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i1.491
Shapiro, B. R., & Silvis, D. (2025). Animated movements, animating methods: An interaction geography approach to space and affect in early childhood education. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 25(3), 901–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984231212723
Shapiro, B. R., Silvis, D., & Hall, R. (2025). Visualization as theory and experience: Interactive qualitative data visualization for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 34(5), 840–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2025.2537945
Shé, C. N., Ní Fhloinn, E., & Mac an Bhaird, C. (2023). Student engagement with technology-enhanced resources in mathematics in higher education: A review. Mathematics, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030787
Shreiner, T. L., & Dykes, B. M. (2021). Visualizing the teaching of data visualizations in social studies: A study of teachers’ data literacy practices, beliefs, and knowledge. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(2), 262–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1850382
Trujillo-Cayado, L. A., Santos, J., Cordobés, F., & Ramos-Payán, M. (2024). Influence of the use of 3D printing technology for teaching chemistry in STEM disciplines. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(4), e22738. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22738
Utaminingsih, S., Machfud, Santosa, & Kassymova, G. (2024). Development of learning management with animated video to increase motivation and learning outcomes. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 41, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.41.2.3142
Wang, H., Xu, H., Zhang, J., Yu, S., Wang, M., Qiu, J., & Zhang, M. (2020). The effect of 3D-printed plastic teeth on scores in a tooth morphology course in a Chinese university. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 469. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02390-0
Weinhandl, R., Mayerhofer, M., Houghton, T., Lavicza, Z., Eichmair, M., & Hohenwarter, M. (2023). Mathematics student personas for the design of technology-enhanced learning environments. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 32. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18032
Xiao, Y.-P., Lai, Y.-K., Zhang, F.-L., Li, C., & Gao, L. (2020). A survey on deep geometry learning: From a representation perspective. Computational Visual Media, 6(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41095-020-0174-8
Žakelj, A., & Klančar, A. (2022). The role of visual representations in geometry learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1393–1411. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1393
Zhang, Q., & Lin, C. (2026). A study on the impact of project-based learning on students’ learning motivation in animation programs. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1722170
Ziatdinov, R., & Valles, J. R., Jr. (2022). Synthesis of modeling, visualization, and programming in GeoGebra as an effective approach for teaching and learning STEM topics. Mathematics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030398
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chumaedi Sugihandardji, Wiwit Puji Rahayu, Ari Wardayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
