The impact of meaningful learning on undergraduate students’ conceptual understanding in mathematics: A mixed-method quasi-experimental study

Authors

  • Nurrahmah STKIP Taman Siswa, Indonesia
  • Taufikurrahman STKIP Taman Siswa Bima
  • Arif Rahman Hakim STKIP Taman Siswa, Indonesia
  • Syarifuddin STKIP Taman Siswa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i2.1164

Keywords:

Learning Motivation, Mathematics Achievement, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Problem-Based Learning, Self-Regulated Learning

Abstract

Background: Conceptual understanding is a fundamental goal of mathematics education, yet many university students continue to experience difficulties in developing deep mathematical understanding due to the predominance of procedural and teacher-centered instruction. Meaningful learning has been proposed as an approach that promotes conceptual development by connecting new knowledge with students’ prior knowledge.

Aims: This study investigated the implementation of meaningful learning in university mathematics classrooms, examined its effects on students’ conceptual understanding, and identified challenges encountered during its implementation.

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-method quasi-experimental design was employed involving 57 undergraduate students in a Mathematics Education Program. The experimental group (n = 29) received meaningful learning instruction, while the control group (n = 28) received conventional instruction. Quantitative data were collected through a conceptual understanding test and a perception questionnaire, while qualitative data were obtained through classroom observations and interviews.

Result: The experimental group achieved significantly higher conceptual understanding scores than the control group (p < 0.001), with a moderate N-gain (0.49) and a large effect size (d = 0.83). Students reported positive perceptions of meaningful learning (M = 4.01). Qualitative findings indicated that prior knowledge activation, contextual problems, collaborative discussion, and reflection supported students’ conceptual development.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that meaningful learning can support conceptual understanding and provide a useful framework for conceptually oriented mathematics instruction in higher education.

References

Basid, A., Sutrisno, E., & Aliyeva, L. R. (2024). Analysis of the effect of contextual problem solving on students’ mathematical reasoning ability. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsme.v1i3.258

Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The contribution of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in mediating L2 knowledge co-construction. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2117. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19

Amalia, L., Makmuri, M., & Hakim, L. E. (2024). Learning design: To improve mathematical problem-solving skills using a contextual approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(3), 2353–2366. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i3.3455

Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. Grune & Stratton.

Ayeh, I. G. (2025). Students’ mathematics conceptual challenges: Exploring students’ thinking, understanding, and misconceptions in functions and graphs. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/16596

Biber, M. (2023). Constructing mental models: Mathematical communication and discourses in conceptual understanding. Journal of Necmettin Erbakan University Ereğli Faculty of Education, 5, 271–305. https://doi.org/10.51119/ereegf.2023.45

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.

Borji, V., Radmehr, F., & Font, V. (2021). The impact of procedural and conceptual teaching on students’ mathematical performance over time. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(3), 404–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1688404

Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2024). Ausubel’s meaningful learning re-visited. Current Psychology, 43, 4579–4598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4

Bukari, H. I., & Addo, A. (2019). Effect of problem-based learning on colleges of education students’ achievement in probability and attitude towards solving probability related problems. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15i2.13

Cai, J., Ding, M., & Hwang, S. (2026). Fostering students’ mathematical understanding: Toward a theoretical framework. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263261442721

Castillo, D., Carrión, J., Chamba, C., Jiménez-Gaona, Y., Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. J., & Lakshminarayanan, V. (2025). Didactic strategies for conceptual understanding and motivation in university mathematics: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1536470

Chen, B.-C. (2025). Using Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory to explore ethnic cultural representation in Taiwanese preschool children’s play. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1569322

Dewi, I. L. K., Rosita, C. D., & Bakar, M. T. (2026). Pemahaman konsep matematis: Dari kognisi individual menuju praktik epistemik-diskursif. Euclid, 13(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.33603/e.v13i1.11834

Drimalla, J. (2025). Inferences, mastery, and objectivity: Examining student understanding of mathematical concepts with inferentialism. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 119(2), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10377-7

Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Effect of blended learning approach on secondary school learners’ mathematics achievement and retention. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19863–19888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12651-w

Elhilal, A. (2025). Digital conceptual mapping for enhancing mathematical concept formation and creative mathematical problem-solving through cognitive flexibility skills: A mixed methods study. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2494945

Evans, T., & Jeong, I. (2023). Concept maps as assessment for learning in university mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(3), 475–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10209-0

Gómez-García, B. (2025). Contemporary didactic methodologies in the teaching of mathematics in higher education: A systematic literature review (2020–2025). Mikailalsys Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 3(3), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.58578/mjms.v3i3.7137

Hacıeminoğlu, E., Yıldız, N. G., & Şeker, R. (2022). Factors related to cognitive reasoning of pre-service teachers’ science process skills: Role of experiments at home on meaningful learning. Sustainability, 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137703

Hague, M. N. (2024). The role of multiple representations and attitudes in enhancing statistical and mathematical learning. Smart Internet of Things, 1(4), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.22105/siot.vi.52

Hanin, V., & Holm, J. (2023). How permeable are the beliefs of future secondary school mathematics teachers to pre-service experiences? Looking across their years of training. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231216836

Hassan, B., Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M., & Khan, Z. A. (2025). Beyond memorization: Cultivating critical thinking skills through classic literature in secondary education for the 21st century learner. Review of Education, Administration & Law, 8(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.47067/real.v8i1.410

Hidayana, R. A., & Lianingsih, N. (2025). Contextual learning as a means to improve elementary school students’ mathematical literacy skills. International Journal of Ethno-Sciences and Education Research, 5(2), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijeer.v5i2.935

Hoe, A. V., Wiebe, J., Slotta, J., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2024). Designing dialogic peer feedback in collaborative learning: The role of Thinq Tank. Education Sciences, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111231

Hu, Y., & Shu, J. (2025). The effect of drama education on enhancing critical thinking through collaboration and communication. Education Sciences, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050565

Hurrell, D. (2021). Conceptual knowledge or procedural knowledge or conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge: Why the conjunction is important to teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.4

Insorio, A. O., & Librada, A. R. P. (2025). Enhancing students’ academic performance by making the mathematics learning experience meaningful through differentiated instruction. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 6(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/16332

Jupri, A., Sispiyati, R., & Chin, K. E. (2021). An investigation of students’ algebraic proficiency from a structure sense perspective. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.1.13125.147-158

Khan, R. K., & Karvitha, K. (2025). Meaningful learning vs. rote learning: Role of teacher leadership on 21st century learners. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5047137

Koskinen, R., & Pitkäniemi, H. (2022). Meaningful learning in mathematics: A research synthesis of teaching approaches. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11715

Latifa, U., Indrasari, P., Pramuditya, S. A., & Asnawati, S. (2025). Connecting concepts and representations in mathematics: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education, 4(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v4i2.1483

Mahmudi, A. (2021). An analysis of mathematics understanding of prospective student-teachers of mathematics. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.44422

Mawardi, D. N., Budiningsih, C. A., & Sugiman. (2023). Blended learning effect on mathematical skills: A meta-analysis study. Ingénierie des Systèmes d'Information, 28(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.280122

Meiliati, R., Djodding, I. M., Aswin, Salido, A., Husain, D. S., Tahir, & Hidayati, U. (2026). Exploration problem-based learning in mathematics learning in higher education: A bibliometric review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102345

Michelsen, M., & Groß, J. (2025). Peer-interaction: Collaborative learning to foster and observe conceptional transformation in science education. Journal of Biological Education, 59(4), 621–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2386251

Mishra, N. R. (2023). Constructivist approach to learning: An analysis of pedagogical models of social constructivist learning theory. Journal of Research and Development, 6(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.3126/jrdn.v6i01.55227

Molaba, S. E. (2026). Exploring the integration of multiple methods of representation for the effective teaching of mathematics word problems. International Journal of Studies in Systematic Reviews, 1(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.66434/ijssr.v1i1.514

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2020). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Prihastari, E. B., Wardono, Mariani, S., & Masrukan. (2026). Meaningful learning to enhance conceptual understanding, engagement, and mathematical reasoning in elementary statistics education. Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 354–369. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i2.1254

Rahmayani, S., Afnaria, & Azis, Z. (2025). Development of learning materials based on the MURDER collaborative learning model to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of mathematics. Kognitif: Jurnal Riset HOTS Pendidikan Matematika, 5(4), 1520–1532. https://doi.org/10.51574/kognitif.v5i4.2422

Rupnow, R., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2023). How mathematicians characterize and attempt to develop understanding of concepts and definitions in proof-based courses. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1284666

Saha, M., Islam, S., Akhi, A. A., & Saha, G. (2024). Factors affecting success and failure in higher education mathematics: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Heliyon, 10(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29173

Schulz, A. (2024). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 27(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-023-09590-7

Schürmann, V., Bodemer, D., & Marquardt, N. (2025). Exploring the use of regular reflections in student collaboration: A case study in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1526487

Siregar, T., Fauzan, A., Yerizon, & Syafriandi. (2025). Designing mathematics teaching through deep learning pedagogy: Toward meaningful, mindful, and joyful learning. Journal of Deep Learning, 1(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.23917/jdl.v1i2.11969

Siswantari, Sabon, S. S., Listiawati, N., Wirda, Y., Zulkardi, & Riyanto, B. (2025). Bridging mathematics and communication: Implementing realistic mathematics education principles for skill development. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp729-752

Sreelohor, T., Jakpeng, S., & Chaijaroen, S. (2025). Constructivist learning environment model for rectifying secondary students’ misconceptions in learning science: Design development and validation phases. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(6), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v14n6p418

Sumarna, M. S., Nindiasari, H., Pujiastuti, H., & Yuhana, Y. (2025). Systematic literature review: Penerapan realistic mathematics education meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi dan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa. Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 4(3), 946–956. https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v4i3.1606

Sung, H., & Nathan, M. J. (2025). Unraveling temporally entangled multimodal interactions: Investigating verbal and nonverbal contributions to collaborative construction of embodied math knowledge. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00504-6

Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: What does it really mean? Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218

Taufikurrahman, Budiyono, & Slamet, I. (2021). Development of mathematics module based on meaningful learning. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043239

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2023). Blended learning in mathematics teacher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 196. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.36985

Vargas-Hernández, J. G., & Vargas-González, O. C. (2022). Strategies for meaningful learning in higher education. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i1.41

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Winarni, S., Kamid, Marzal, J., & Asrial. (2025). Numeracy skill development in prospective mathematics teachers: Challenges and opportunities in real-world contexts. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp91-110

Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024). Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415

Zhou, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Ryan, Z., Stiso, C., Murphy, D., Danish, J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2025). Disagreeing softly: Supporting students in managing disagreement in peer critique. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 20(2), 249–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09438-z

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26