Hydrological Effects on Rock Mass Quality and Rippability of Heterogeneous Karstic Limestone

Authors

  • Andy Erwin Wijaya Department of Mining Engineering, Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta
  • Partama Misdiyanta Department of Mining Engineering, Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta
  • Rizqi Prastowo Department of Mining Engineering, Institut Teknologi Nasional Yogyakarta
  • Yoshitaka Mitsui Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University
  • Keodouangdy Yongthong Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba
  • Berwyn Dzaky Radhitya Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58524/ijhes.v5i1.1122

Abstract

The proposed study area is located approximately 1.9 km southwest of the main cement plant in Tuban, Indonesia. This research aims to evaluate the rippability characteristics of the limestone formation underlying the planned development site. The assessment is based on data obtained from a geotechnical borehole investigation (CR-1), integrated with previous subsurface exploration results. The site is designated for shallow foundation systems designed to withstand bearing pressures ranging from 300 to 800 kPa. Subsurface conditions are characterized by karstic limestone with complex hydrogeological features. The limestone exhibits high sensitivity to water infiltration, dissolution processes, and mechanical property degradation under saturated conditions. Significant spatial variability in rock mass quality and strength is observed over relatively short vertical and horizontal distances. The uppermost layer comprises residual lateritic (red) soil derived from in-situ weathering of the underlying limestone. The presence of limestone gravels and boulders within the residual soil indicates a transitional interface between the overburden and the more competent limestone strata. The limestone formation consists of heterogeneous materials, including highly porous honeycomb-textured rock and relatively intact, sound limestone, distributed irregularly across the site. This heterogeneity results in considerable variability in mechanical strength and excavation response. The findings provide essential insights into the rippability behavior of the limestone and its implications for foundation design and construction planning in karst environments.

References

Adams, S., Titus, R., Pietersen, K., Tredoux, G., & Harris, C. (2001). Hydrochemical characteristics of aquifers near Sutherland in the Western Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 241(1–2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00370-X

Assunção, P., Galvão, P., Lucon, T., Doi, B., Marshall Fleming, P., Marques, T., & Costa, F. (2023). Hydrodynamic and hydrodispersive behavior of a highly karstified Neoproterozoic hydrosystem indicated by tracer tests and modeling approach. Journal of Hydrology, 619, 129300. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2023.129300

Bailly-Comte, V., & Pistre, S. (2021). A parsimonious approach for large-scale tracer test interpretation. Hydrogeology Journal, 29(4), 1539–1550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02327-x

Barberá, J. A., & Andreo, B. (2015). Hydrogeological processes in a fluviokarstic area inferred from the analysis of natural hydrogeochemical tracers: The case study of eastern Serranía de Ronda (S Spain). Journal of Hydrology, 523, 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2015.01.080

Benischke, R. (2021). Advances in the methodology and application of tracing in karst aquifers: A review. Hydrogeology Journal, 29(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02278-9

Berglund, J. L., Toran, L., & Herman, E. K. (2019). Deducing flow path mixing by storm-induced bulk chemistry and REE variations in two karst springs. Journal of Hydrology, 571, 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2019.01.050

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10

Clark, I. D., & Fritz, P. (2013). Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. CRC Press.

Doerfliger, N., Jeannin, P.-Y., & Zwahlen, F. (1999). Water vulnerability assessment in karst environments: A new method of defining protection areas using a multi-attribute approach and GIS tools (EPIK method). Environmental Geology, 39(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050446

Eftimi, R., & Malík, P. (2019). Assessment of regional flow type and groundwater sensitivity to pollution using hydrograph analyses and hydrochemical data of the Selita and Blue Eye karst springs, Albania. Hydrogeology Journal, 27(6), 2045–2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01974-5

Fang, S. (2019). Study on 14C dating analysis of deep groundwater resources on islands. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 208–209, 105994. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVRAD.2019.105994

Field, M. S. (2002). The QTRACER2 program for tracer-breakthrough curve analysis for tracer tests in karstic aquifers and other hydrologic systems. National Center for Environmental Assessment.

Filippini, M., Squarzoni, G., De Waele, J., Fiorucci, A., Vigna, B., & Grillo, B. (2018). Differentiated spring behavior under changing hydrological conditions in an alpine karst aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 556, 572–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2017.11.040

Goldscheider, N., Chen, Z., Auler, A. S., Bakalowicz, M., Broda, S., & Drew, D. (2020). Global distribution of carbonate rocks and karst water resources. Hydrogeology Journal, 28(5), 1661–1677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02139-5

Hartmann, A., Goldscheider, N., Wagener, T., Lange, J., & Weiler, M. (2014). Karst water resources in a changing world: Review of hydrological modeling approaches. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(3), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000443

Hillebrand, O., Nödler, K., Sauter, M., & Licha, T. (2015). Multitracer experiment to evaluate the attenuation of selected organic micropollutants in a karst aquifer. Science of the Total Environment, 506–507, 338–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2014.10.102

Ji, H., Luo, M., Yin, M., Li, C., Wan, L., & Huang, K. (2022). Storage and release of conservative solute between karst conduit and fissures using a laboratory analog. Journal of Hydrology, 612, 128228. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2022.128228

Lastennet, R., & Mudry, J. (1997). Role of karstification and rainfall in the behavior of a heterogeneous karst system. Environmental Geology, 32(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050200

Lauber, U., & Goldscheider, N. (2014). Use of artificial and natural tracers to assess groundwater transit-time distribution and flow systems in a high-alpine karst system. Hydrogeology Journal, 22(8), 1807–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-014-1173-6

López-Chicano, M., Bouamama, M., Vallejos, A., & Pulido-Bosch, A. (2001). Factors which determine the hydrogeochemical behaviour of karstic springs. Applied Geochemistry, 16(9–10), 1179–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00012-9

Maréchal, J.-C., & Etcheverry, D. (2003). The use of 3H and 18O tracers to characterize water inflows in Alpine tunnels. Applied Geochemistry, 18(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00101-4

Mudarra, M., & Andreo, B. (2011). Characterisation of dissolved organic matter in karst spring waters using intrinsic fluorescence. Science of the Total Environment, 409(18), 3448–3462. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2011.05.026

Parkhurst, D. L., & Appelo, C. A. J. (2013). Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods.

Pratama, A. D., Dwiputra, D. S., Nurkholis, A., Haryono, E., Cahyadi, A., Agniy, R. F., & Adji, T. N. (2021). Factors affecting hydrochemistry of karst springs and their relationship to aquifer development. Environmental Processes, 8(4), 1379–1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-021-00547-7

Ravbar, N., Mulec, J., Mayaud, C., Blatnik, M., Kogovšek, B., & Petrič, M. (2023). A comprehensive early warning system for karst water sources contamination risk. Science of the Total Environment, 885, 163958. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2023.163958

Toran, L., & Reisch, C. E. (2013). Using stormwater hysteresis to characterize karst spring discharge. Groundwater, 51(4), 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00984.x

Vadillo, I., & Ojeda, L. (2022). Carbonate aquifers threatened by contamination of hazardous anthropic activities: Challenges. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 26, 100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100336

White, W. B., Herman, J. S., Herman, E. K., & Rutigliano, M. (2018). Contaminated groundwater in karst: Why is it an issue? In W. B. White et al. (Eds.), Karst groundwater contamination and public health (pp. 3–5). Springer.

Yang, P., Yuan, D., Yuan, W., Kuang, Y., Jia, P., & He, Q. (2010). Formations of groundwater hydrogeochemistry in a karst system during storm events as revealed by PCA. Chinese Science Bulletin, 55(14), 1412–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-0083-9

Zou, C., Liu, Y., Pan, H., Lei, Y., Yin, L., & Sun, Z. (2023). Enrichment mechanism of fluoride in different aquifer systems of the Aksu area located in the Tarim Basin, Northwest China. Applied Geochemistry, 151, 105606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APGEOCHEM.2023.105606

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Wijaya, A. E., Misdiyanta, P., Prastowo, R., Mitsui, Y., Yongthong, K., & Radhitya, B. D. (2026). Hydrological Effects on Rock Mass Quality and Rippability of Heterogeneous Karstic Limestone. International Journal of Hydrological and Environmental for Sustainability, 5(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.58524/ijhes.v5i1.1122