Exploring cultural technological mathematics learning in vocational schools for creative thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i1.1115Keywords:
Creative Thinking, Design Thinking, Ethnomathematics, Technology-Integrated Learning, Vocational Mathematics EducationAbstract
Background: Mathematics education in vocational schools faces challenges in fostering students’ creative thinking, particularly in understanding abstract concepts and generating alternative solutions. Classroom practices often emphasize procedural replication, while teachers encounter difficulties in addressing diverse learning needs, highlighting the need for innovative, contextual, and culturally responsive approaches.
Aims: This study aims to strengthen vocational students’ creative thinking in mathematics by designing an integrated instructional model that combines pedagogy, technology, and cultural elements.
Methods: A qualitative design thinking approach was applied through the stages of Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test/Evaluate. Data were collected using questionnaires, interviews, and classroom observations to identify student and teacher needs. The proposed model was further examined through a meta-analysis using effect size calculations to synthesize findings from relevant empirical studies.
Results: The findings indicate that students need more flexible, innovative, and culturally meaningful learning experiences. An instructional prototype, Gema-Batik, was developed by integrating Project-Based Learning, ethnomathematics, GeoGebra, and jBatik within a design thinking framework. The model emphasizes problem orientation, exploration, digital modeling, motif creation, and presentation, targeting creative thinking indicators such as fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Meta-analytic results show a high pooled effect size, indicating strong potential to enhance creative thinking and related competencies.
Conclusion: The Gema-Batik model offers a novel, culturally grounded, and technology-integrated approach that contributes both theoretically and practically to vocational mathematics education, particularly in fostering creative thinking aligned with the demands of creative industries.
References
Alabbasi, A. M. A., Paek, S. H., Kim, D., & Cramond, B. (2022). What do educators need to know about the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1000385. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000385
Awalurahman, H. W., Raharjana, I. K., Kartono, K., & Fauzi, S. S. M. (2025). Generating user personas for eliciting requirements using online news data. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 11(3), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.11.3.407-419
Carlgren, L., Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M. (2016). Framing design thinking: The concept in idea and enactment. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153
Chang, T.-S., Wang, H.-C., Haynes, A. M., Song, M.-M., Lai, S.-Y., & Hsieh, S.-H. (2022). Enhancing student creativity through an interdisciplinary, project-oriented problem-based learning undergraduate curriculum. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101173
Cibro, B., Siregar, H., & Rambe, I. H. (2021). Development of project-based learning model assisted by GeoGebra software to improve students’ creative thinking ability. Journal of Mathematics Technology and Education, 1(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.32734/jomte.v1i1.7575
Ditasona, C. (2018). Ethnomathematics exploration of the Toba community: Elements of geometry transformation contained in gorga. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335(1), 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012042
Foster, J., & Yaoyuneyong, G. (2016). Teaching innovation: Equipping students to overcome real-world challenges. Higher Education Pedagogies, 1(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2015.1134195
Furner, J. M. (2024). Transformations in mathematics education. Transformations, 10(1). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/transformations/vol10/iss1/1
Garbuio, M., & Lin, N. (2021). Innovative idea generation in problem finding: Abductive reasoning, cognitive impediments, and the promise of artificial intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(6), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12602
Itter, D., & Meyers, N. (2017). Fear, loathing and ambivalence toward learning and teaching mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(2), 123–141.
Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2023). Teaching and learning of geometry: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070682
Koskinen, R., & Pitkäniemi, H. (2022). Meaningful learning in mathematics: A research synthesis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11715
Maulana, D. A., Fuad, Y., & Astuti, Y. P. (2021). Pelatihan penggunaan software jBatik kepada guru. ABIMANYU: Journal of Community Engagement, 2(2).
Malatjie, F., & Machaba, F. (2019). Exploring learners’ conceptual understanding of transformation geometry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), e1818. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110784
Mengue-Topio, H., Guedira, Y., Lepreux, S., & Kolski, C. (2024). Ideation, focus groups, and brainstorming. In Human-Computer Interaction. CRC Press.
Novianggraeni, T. D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2017). Improving students’ creative thinking ability through problem posing–GeoGebra. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(6).
Nugroho, A. A., Dwijayanti, I., & Atmoko, P. Y. (2020). Meta-analysis of problem-solving ability. AKSIOMA, 9(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i1.2659
Nurislamiati, & Irfan, M. (2022). Pengaruh PjBL berbasis etnomatematika terhadap berpikir kreatif. Proximal, 5(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v5i2.1779
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Indonesia factsheet). https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108
Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
Purnamasari, A., & Dhoruri, A. (2025). Effectiveness of PBL based on ethnomathematics. Injurity: Interdisciplinary Journal and Humanity, 4(5).
Riyadi, S., Jayanti, I. D., & Purwosetiyono, D. (2024). Eksplorasi desain media android berbasis design thinking. JIPMat, 9(1), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v9i1.495
Rosen, Y., Jaeger, G., Newstadt, M., Bakken, S., Rushkin, I., Dawood, M., & Purifoy, C. (2023). A multidimensional approach for enhancing and measuring creative thinking and cognitive skills. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(4), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2022-0227
Rubel, L. H., & McCloskey, A. V. (2021). Contextualization of mathematics: Which and whose world? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10041-4
Sa’id, M. S., Arfinanti, N., & Azka, R. (2021). Etnomatematika pada batik kawung. JIPM, 3(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.37729/jipm.v3i2
Shermukhammadov, B. (2022). Creativity of a Teacher in an Innovative Educational Environment. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 22(12), 126. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i12.5468
Shively, K., Stith, K. M., & Rubenstein, L. D. (2018). Measuring What Matters: Assessing Creativity, Critical Thinking, and the Design Process. Gifted Child Today, 41(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217518768361
Suherman, S., et al. (2020). Improving HOTS with PjBL assisted by GeoGebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012027
Suhirman, S., & Ghazali, I. (2022). Exploring critical thinking and curiosity. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.1317
Sumardi, S. (2023). PBL-STEAM with jBatik to enhance creative thinking. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V6-i5-38
Sun, M., Wang, M., Wegerif, R., & Peng, J. (2022). Idea generation through mind mapping. Computers & Education, 176, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104359
Utomo, H. N., Muhtarom, M., & Dwijayanti, I. (2024). Eksplorasi Media Interaktif Googles Site Dengan Alur Merdeka Berbasis Design Thinking. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v4i1.1262
Uygun, T. (2020). Inquiry-based design research in geometry transformation. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(3), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00314-1
Valerian Amadeus, M., Nurjanah, & Yulianti, K. (2025). Computational thinking with PjBL and GeoGebra. Edumatica, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v15i1.42801
Vos, P. (2018). Authenticity in mathematics education. Education Sciences, 8(4), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040195
Weng, X., Chiu, T. K. F., & Tsang, C. C. (2022). Creativity through maker education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046
Wiyanti, A. I., & Hadi, W. (2023). Pembelajaran matematika berbasis teknologi. Prisma Sains, 11(3), 805–815.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Global innovation index 2024. https://www.wipo.int/global_innovation_index
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wilda Febriana Wijayanti, Ida Dwijayanti, Lukman Harun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
