Examining reading comprehension and critical thinking skills among fourth-grade elementary school students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i1.1114Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Elementary Students, Literacy Skills, Reading comprehension, Student analysisAbstract
Background: Reading comprehension and critical thinking are fundamental competencies that support students’ literacy development and learning across subjects. Nevertheless, many elementary school students still experience difficulties in interpreting texts and evaluating information critically.
Aims: This study aims to examine the reading comprehension and critical thinking abilities of fourth-grade elementary school students in Indonesian language learning.
Method: The study employed a descriptive quantitative design. Participants consisted of 37 fourth-grade students from a public elementary school in Serang City selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using an essay-based test developed according to indicators of reading comprehension and critical thinking, including identifying problems, comparing arguments, proposing solutions, generating ideas, and expressing opinions. The instrument was validated through expert judgment to ensure content suitability. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistical techniques such as mean scores, percentages, and categorization of students’ ability levels.
Results: The analysis revealed that students’ critical thinking skills generally fell into the moderate category with an average score of 60.14 out of 100. Students’ scores ranged from 30 to 80, with both the median and mode recorded at 65, indicating that most scores were concentrated around this value. In terms of category distribution, 21.62% of students were classified as low, 64.86% as moderate, and 13.51% as high.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that although students have developed basic critical thinking abilities, their analytical reasoning and argumentation skills remain limited. Therefore, instructional strategies that encourage deeper reading, discussion, and reasoning activities are needed to strengthen students’ critical thinking development.
References
Anggraeni, D. M., Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Shofiyah, N., & Jatmiko, B. (2023). Systematic review of problem based learning research in fostering critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334
Bakhtiari Moghadam, Z., Narafshan, M. H., & Tajadini, M. (2023). The effect of implementing a critical thinking intervention program on English language learners’ critical thinking, reading comprehension, and classroom climate. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00188-3
Ballock, E., & McQuitty, V. (2023). Reasoning Processes Involved in Reading and Responding to Students’ Writing. Literacy Research and Instruction, 62(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2059419
Bhuttah, T. M., Xusheng, Q., Abid, M. N., & Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing student critical thinking and learning outcomes through innovative pedagogical approaches in higher education: The mediating role of inclusive leadership. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75379-0
Bogaerds-Hazenberg, S. T. M., Evers-Vermeul, J., & van den Bergh, H. (2021). A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Text Structure Instruction on Reading Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.311
Dadandı, P. U., & Dadandı, İ. (2022). The Relationships Among Teachers’ Behaviours That Encourage Students’ Reading Engagement, Reading Enjoyment, Reading Self-Efficacy and Reading Success. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.56.9.3
Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2290342. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Dellantonio, S., & Pastore, L. (2021). Ignorance, misconceptions and critical thinking. Synthese, 198(8), 7473–7501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02529-7
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021a). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021b). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
Dwyer, C. P. (2023). An Evaluative Review of Barriers to Critical Thinking in Educational and Real-World Settings. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060105
Eberle, J., & Hobrecht, J. (2021). The lonely struggle with autonomy: A case study of first-year university students’ experiences during emergency online teaching. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106804
Elaby, M. F., Elwishy, H. M., Moatamed, S. F., Abdelwahed, M. A., & Rashiedy, A. E. (2022). Does design-build concept improve problem-solving skills? An analysis of first-year engineering students. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(6), 101780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101780
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Golden, B. (2023). Enabling critical thinking development in higher education through the use of a structured planning tool. Irish Educational Studies, 42(4), 949–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2258497
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023). Explaining Why the Computer Says No: Algorithmic Transparency Affects the Perceived Trustworthiness of Automated Decision-Making. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13483
Hossain, K. I. (2024). Literature-based language learning: Challenges, and opportunities for English learners. Ampersand, 13, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2024.100201
Howell, R. A. (2021). Engaging students in education for sustainable development: The benefits of active learning, reflective practices and flipped classroom pedagogies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 325, 129318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129318
Isoaho, K., Gritsenko, D., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Topic Modeling and Text Analysis for Qualitative Policy Research. Policy Studies Journal, 49(1), 300–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12343
Jones, C. A., & Davison, A. (2021). Disempowering emotions: The role of educational experiences in social responses to climate change. Geoforum, 118, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.11.006
Kranz, J., Baur, A., & Möller, A. (2023). Learners’ challenges in understanding and performing experiments: A systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 321–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2138151
Le, H. V., & Nguyen, L. Q. (2024). Promoting L2 learners’ critical thinking skills: The role of social constructivism in reading class. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1241973
Liang, W., & Fung, D. (2021). Fostering critical thinking in English-as-a-second-language classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100769
Lombardi, L., Mednick, F. J., De Backer, F., & Lombaerts, K. (2021). Fostering Critical Thinking across the Primary School’s Curriculum in the European Schools System. Education Sciences, 11(9), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090505
Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x
Ma, Y. (2023). Exploration of flipped classroom approach to enhance critical thinking skills. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20895
McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2021). The Multidimensional Knowledge in Text Comprehension framework. Educational Psychologist, 56(3), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1872379
Medranda-Morales, N., Palacios Mieles, V. D., & Villalba Guevara, M. (2023). Reading Comprehension: An Essential Process for the Development of Critical Thinking. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111068
Paige, D., Rupley, W. H., & Ziglari, L. (2024). Critical Thinking in Reading Comprehension: Fine Tuning the Simple View of Reading. Education Sciences, 14(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030225
Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S., & Berry, A. (2022). Learning Through Play at School – A Framework for Policy and Practice. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801
Qin, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, X., & Skare, M. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Investigation and Systematic Review. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 1736–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01183-2
Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2021). The Argumentation Rating Tool: Assessing and supporting teacher facilitation and student argumentation during text-based discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103464
Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P.-O. (2021). Learners’ Critical Thinking About Learning Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0644. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003
Singhal, K., Tu, T., Gottweis, J., Sayres, R., Wulczyn, E., Amin, M., Hou, L., Clark, K., Pfohl, S. R., Cole-Lewis, H., Neal, D., Rashid, Q. M., Schaekermann, M., Wang, A., Dash, D., Chen, J. H., Shah, N. H., Lachgar, S., Mansfield, P. A., … Natarajan, V. (2025). Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models. Nature Medicine, 31(3), 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03423-7
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The Role of Background Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2023). Elementary Teachers’ Perspectives on Teaching Reading Comprehension. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 54(3), 888–913. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_LSHSS-22-00118
Trasmundi, S. B., Kokkola, L., Schilhab, T., & Mangen, A. (2021). A distributed perspective on reading: Implications for education. Language Sciences, A Dialogue between Distributed Language and Reading Disciplines, 84, 101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101367
Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2023). Fostering and assessing student critical thinking: From theory to teaching practice. European Journal of Education, 58(3), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12569
Wyse, D., & Hacking, C. (2024). Decoding, reading and writing: The double helix theory of teaching. Literacy, 58(3), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12367
Yavuz, F., Çelik, Ö., & Yavaş Çelik, G. (2025). Utilizing large language models for EFL essay grading: An examination of reliability and validity in rubric-based assessments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13494
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Husnul Hotimah, Atep Sujana, Encep Supriatna, Iik Nurulpaik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
