A descriptive analysis of fifth-grade students’ creative thinking skills in solving perimeter problems of plane figures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i1.1094Keywords:
Creativity, Geometry, Perimeter, Problem-SolvingAbstract
Background: Creative thinking plays a central role in mathematics learning, especially in geometry, where students are required to explore various solution strategies and explain their reasoning clearly. Nevertheless, many elementary students still encounter difficulties in expressing and developing their mathematical ideas when solving problems.
Aims: This study aims to provide a descriptive account of fifth-grade students’ creative thinking skills in solving perimeter problems of plane figures, viewed through the indicators of fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration.
Method: The research employed a descriptive quantitative design involving 24 fifth-grade students. Data were gathered through an open-ended test constructed to reflect the four indicators of creative thinking. Students’ responses were scored using an assessment rubric, and the results were examined through descriptive statistical analysis, including the mean, score range, and standard deviation.
Results: Students’ scores ranged from 21 to 84, with a mean of 54.2 (SD = 15.6), indicating that overall creative thinking performance was relatively low. Only 29.2% of students reached the predetermined mastery criterion. Among the four indicators, originality emerged as the strongest aspect, whereas elaboration showed the lowest achievement, revealing students’ challenges in expanding and detailing their ideas
Conclusion: The findings suggest that students’ creative thinking skills in perimeter problem solving require further development, particularly in elaborating mathematical reasoning. Strengthening open-ended and reasoning-oriented instructional practices may help enhance creative engagement in geometry learning.
References
Akinpelu, G. A., Akinpelu, S. A., Folorunsho, M. S., Ameen, K. S., Adebayo, S. R., & Daramola, C. Y. (2025). Impact of mastery learning instructional scheme on post-basic school students’ engagement levels in mathematics in Osogbo, Nigeria. Discover Education, 4(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00535-1
Alabbasi, A. M. A., Paek, S. H., Kim, D., & Cramond, B. (2022a). What do educators need to know about the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000385
Alabbasi, A. M. A., Paek, S. H., Kim, D., & Cramond, B. (2022b). What do educators need to know about the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000385
Bizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023). Innovative pedagogical principles and technological tools capabilities for immersive blended learning: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1373–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w
Chang, H.-F., & Li, T. (2025). A framework for collaborating a Large Language Model tool in brainstorming for triggering creative thoughts. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56, 101755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101755
Christou, O., Manou, D. B., Armenia, S., Franco, E., Blouchoutzi, A., & Papathanasiou, J. (2024). Fostering a Whole-Institution Approach to Sustainability through Systems Thinking: An Analysis of the State-of-the-Art in Sustainability Integration in Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability, 16(6), 2508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062508
Cirneanu, A.-L., & Moldoveanu, C.-E. (2024). Use of Digital Technology in Integrated Mathematics Education. Applied System Innovation, 7(4), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7040066
Dahshan, M., & Galanti, T. (2024). Teachers in the Loop: Integrating Computational Thinking and Mathematics to Build Early Place Value Understanding. Education Sciences, 14(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020201
Fakaruddin, F. J., Shahali, E. H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2024). Creative thinking patterns in primary school students’ hands-on science activities involving robotic as learning tools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09825-5
Jackson, D., Shan, H., & Meek, S. (2022). Enhancing graduates’ enterprise capabilities through work-integrated learning in co-working spaces. Higher Education, 84(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00756-x
Ji, W., & Wong, G. K. W. (2025). Integrating problem-based learning and computational thinking: Cultivating creative thinking in primary education. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1625105
Karunarathne, W., & Calma, A. (2024). Assessing creative thinking skills in higher education: Deficits and improvements. Studies in Higher Education, 49(1), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2225532
Lehmann, T. (2023). Learning to calculate surface area: A focus on strategy choice. Research in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2022.2081991
Leong, Y. H., Cheng, L. P., Toh, W. Y. K., Kaur, B., & Toh, T. L. (2021). Teaching students to apply formula using instructional materials: A case of a Singapore teacher’s practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00290-1
Morgan, D. L. (2023). Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231211248. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248
Oliveira, A. W., Brown, A. O., Zhang, W. S., LeBrun, P., Eaton, L., & Yemen, S. (2021). Fostering creativity in science learning: The potential of open-ended student drawing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103416
Rahayuningsih, S., Kartinah, K., & Nurhusain, M. (2023). Students’ Creative Thinking Stages in Inquiry-Based Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study of Elementary School Students in Indonesia. Acta Scientiae, 25(3), 238–272. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7612
Rahayuningsih, S., Sirajuddin, S., & Ikram, M. (2021). Using Open-ended Problem-solving Tests to Identify Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.66.8.3
Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2022). Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: A Review of Instructional Approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2
Richit, A., Tomkelski, M. L., & Richit, A. (2021). Understandings of perimeter and area mobilized with an exploratory approach in a lesson study. Acta Scientiae, 23(5), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6226
Samaniego, M., Usca, N., Salguero, J., & Quevedo, W. (2024). Creative Thinking in Art and Design Education: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020192
Schoevers, E. M., Kroesbergen, E. H., Moerbeek, M., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2022). The relation between creativity and students’ performance on different types of geometrical problems in elementary education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 54(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01315-5
Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Education: Using Expert Wisdom and Research to Frame Educational Practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022a). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022b). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Tao, Y., Wu, F., Zhang, J., & Yang, X. (2023). Constructing a classroom observation instrument of creative potential for primary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101317
Torres-Peña, R. C., Peña-González, D., Lara-Orozco, J. L., Ariza, E. A., & Vergara, D. (2025). Enhancing Numerical Thinking Through Problem Solving: A Teaching Experience for Third-Grade Mathematics. Education Sciences, 15(6), 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060667
Urrutia, F., & Araya, R. (2022). Do Written Responses to Open-Ended Questions on Fourth-Grade Online Formative Assessments in Mathematics Help Predict Scores on End-of-Year Standardized Tests? Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040082
Wei, Y., Zhang, Q., & Guo, J. (2022). Can Mathematical Modelling Be Taught and Learned in Primary Mathematics Classrooms: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. Education Sciences, 12(12), 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120923
Weiss, S., & Wilhelm, O. (2022). Is Flexibility More than Fluency and Originality? Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040096
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Teti Husniati Teti, Atep Sujana Atep, Encep Supriatna Encep, Supriadi Supriadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
