School ARventure: A design thinking framework for gamified augmented reality mathematics learning for students with intellectual disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i1.1082Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Design Thinking, Gamified Learning Media, Intellectual Disabilities, Mathematics LearningAbstract
Background: Students with intellectual disabilities often experience difficulties in learning mathematics due to limitations in working memory, challenges in processing abstract symbols, and the limited availability of adaptive learning media in special education settings. In many special schools, mathematics instruction still relies on static physical manipulatives that provide limited opportunities to connect abstract mathematical ideas with meaningful learning experiences.
Aims: This study aims to propose a conceptual design framework called School ARventure, a gamified Augmented Reality mathematics learning environment integrated with a three-dimensional school model to support contextual mathematics learning for students with intellectual disabilities.
Method: This research employed a qualitative design guided by the Design Thinking framework, focusing on the stages of Empathize, Define, and Ideate. Data were collected through classroom observations, questionnaires, and semi structured interviews involving teachers and students from three special education schools. The instruments were validated by experts, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify learning barriers, user needs, and design requirements.
Results: The study produced an initial design framework addressing three main needs: concrete visualization of numerical quantities, reduced motor demands in measurement activities, and simplified representation of mathematical word problems. Three AR based features were conceptualized: AR Counting Adventure, AR Length Virtual Ruler, and Animated Story Quest, integrated with a physical school model as a contextual anchor.
Conclusion: The findings present School ARventure as a Design Thinking based framework for gamified Augmented Reality mathematics learning for students with intellectual disabilities and provide a foundation for future prototype development and empirical evaluation.
References
Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2023). Student-content interactions: Exploring behavioural engagement with self-regulated inquiry-based online learning modules. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00221-x
AlGerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Electronics, 12(18), 3953. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953
Almuaqel, I. A. (2024). Virtual Reality and Inclusive Learning of Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Review of Findings and the Path Ahead. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 13049–13065. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3243530
Asenova, M., Del Zozzo, A., & Santi, G. (2023). Unfolding Teachers’ Interpretative Knowledge into Semiotic Interpretative Knowledge to Understand and Improve Mathematical Learning in an Inclusive Perspective. Education Sciences, 13(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010065
Bali, C., Várkonyi, G., Szabó, M., & Zsidó, A. N. (2025). The impact of visual cues on reducing cognitive load in interactive storybooks for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 260, 106320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106320
Barr, F., & Mavropoulou, S. (2021). Curriculum Accommodations in Mathematics Instruction for Adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disability Educated in Inclusive Classrooms. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68(2), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1684457
Bini, G., Weinhandl, R., & Anđić, B. (2024). Innovative learning environments. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 18(1–2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2024.2392285
Byrne, E. M., Jensen, H., Thomsen, B. S., & Ramchandani, P. G. (2023). Educational interventions involving physical manipulatives for improving children’s learning and development: A scoping review. Review of Education, 11(2), e3400. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3400
Castro-Alonso, J. C., de Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021). Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1379–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9
Cheung, A. (2021). Synchronous online teaching, a blessing or a curse? Insights from EFL primary students’ interaction during online English lessons. System, 100, 102566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102566
Childs, E., Mohammad, F., Stevens, L., Burbelo, H., Awoke, A., Rewkowski, N., & Manocha, D. (2024). An Overview of Enhancing Distance Learning Through Emerging Augmented and Virtual Reality Technologies. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(8), 4480–4496. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3264577
Chmiel, J., Nadobnik, J., Smerdel, S., & Niedzielska, M. (2025). Resting-State Electroencephalogram (EEG) as a Biomarker of Learning Disabilities in Children—A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165902
Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Doleck, T. (2021). Strategic competence for multistep fraction word problems: An overlooked aspect of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10028-1
Daryanes, F., Darmadi, D., Fikri, K., Sayuti, I., Rusandi, M. A., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2023). The development of articulate storyline interactive learning media based on case methods to train student’s problem-solving ability. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15082
Dritsas, E., & Trigka, M. (2025). Methodological and Technological Advancements in E-Learning. Information, 16(1) . https://doi.org/10.3390/info16010056
Durgungoz, F. C., & Durgungoz, A. (2025). “Interactive lessons are great, but too much is too much”: Hearing out neurodivergent students, Universal Design for Learning and the case for integrating more anonymous technology in higher education. Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01389-6
Engelbrecht, J., & Borba, M. C. (2024). Recent developments in using digital technology in mathematics education. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01530-2
Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 14, 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163
Guaman-Quintanilla, S., Everaert, P., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2023). Impact of design thinking in higher education: A multi-actor perspective on problem solving and creativity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09724-z
Hickendorff, M. (2021). The Demands of Simple and Complex Arithmetic Word Problems on Language and Cognitive Resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727761
Ion, T.-C., & Popescu, E. (2025). An innovative distance learning platform for mathematics education in secondary schools: Design, development and preliminary studies. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 5529–5560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13040-z
Iqbal, M. Z., Mangina, E., & Campbell, A. G. (2022). Current Challenges and Future Research Directions in Augmented Reality for Education. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(9), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6090075
Jamal, T., Kircher, J., & Donaldson, J. P. (2021). Re-Visiting Design Thinking for Learning and Practice: Critical Pedagogy, Conative Empathy. Sustainability, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020964
Kharbat, F. F., Alshawabkeh, A., & Woolsey, M. L. (2020). Identifying gaps in using artificial intelligence to support students with intellectual disabilities from education and health perspectives. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 73(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2020-0054
Koumpouros, Y. (2024a). Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00288-0
Koumpouros, Y. (2024b). Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00288-0
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022a). Augmented Reality and Gamification in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Research, Applications, and Empirical Studies. Applied Sciences, 12(13), 6809. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136809
Lampropoulos, G., Keramopoulos, E., Diamantaras, K., & Evangelidis, G. (2022b). Augmented Reality and Gamification in Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Research, Applications, and Empirical Studies. Applied Sciences, 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136809
Levey, S. (2023). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Education, 203(2), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220574211031954
Manfreda Kolar, V., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical Literacy from the Perspective of Solving Contextual Problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467–483.
Mokmin, N. A. M., Hanjun, S., Jing, C., & Qi, S. (2024). Impact of an AR-based learning approach on the learning achievement, motivation, and cognitive load of students on a design course. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00270-2
Moleko, M. M. (2022). Using universal design for instruction principles to guide flexible, inclusive and accessible teaching of geometry. Issues in Educational Research, 32(2), 613–633. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.579423839652563
Muir, T., Wang, I., Trimble, A., Mainsbridge, C., & Douglas, T. (2022). Using Interactive Online Pedagogical Approaches to Promote Student Engagement. Education Sciences, 12(6), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060415
Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The Use of Multiple Representations in Undergraduate Physics Education: What Do we Know and Where Do we Go from Here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1934. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577
Park, J., Bryant, D. P., & Shin, M. (2022). Effects of Interventions Using Virtual Manipulatives for Students With Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of Single-Case Research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(4), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194211006336
Perifanou, M., Economides, A. A., & Nikou, S. A. (2023). Teachers’ Views on Integrating Augmented Reality in Education: Needs, Opportunities, Challenges and Recommendations. Future Internet, 15(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010020
Reyes, R. L., & Villanueva, J. A. (2024). Narrative-Based Concept Representations: Fostering Visual Cognition in the Introductory Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 1106–1119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01151
Rivera, E. S., & Garden, C. L. P. (2021). Gamification for student engagement: A framework. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 999–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1875201
Rizk, J., & Hillier, C. (2022). Digital technology and increasing engagement among students with disabilities: Interaction rituals and digital capital. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100099
Rusmann, A., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2022). When design thinking goes to school: A literature review of design competences for the K-12 level. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 2063–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09692-4
Schnepel, S., Sermier Dessemontet, R., & Moser Opitz, E. (2024). The impact of inclusive education on the mathematical progress of pupils with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(12), 2815–2829. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2132425
Strickland, T. K. (2022). Algebra Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities in the Era of Common Core. Intervention in School and Clinic, 57(5), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512211032613
Swidan, O., & Faggiano, E. (2022a). Constructing shared mathematical meanings in the classroom with digital artifacts that simulate real-world phenomena. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00362-7
Swidan, O., & Faggiano, E. (2022b). Constructing shared mathematical meanings in the classroom with digital artifacts that simulate real-world phenomena. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00362-7
Velu, S. R. (2023). Design Thinking Approach for Increasing Innovative Action in Universities: ICT’s Mediating Effect. Sustainability, 15(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010024
Wakhata, R., Mutarutinya, V., & Balimuttajjo, S. (2023). Exploring the impact of Stein et al.’s levels of cognitive demand in supporting students’ mathematics heuristic problem-solving abilities. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.949988
Weinhandl, R., Mayerhofer, M., Houghton, T., Lavicza, Z., Kleinferchner, L. M., Anđić, B., Eichmair, M., & Hohenwarter, M. (2024). Enhancing user-centred educational design: Developing personas of mathematics school students. Heliyon, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24173
Wen, Y. (2021). Augmented reality enhanced cognitive engagement: Designing classroom-based collaborative learning activities for young language learners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09893-z
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erika Kurniasari, Ida Dwijayanti, Nizaruddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
