Enhancing the Competence of Qurban Committees through Technical Training on Halal and Thoyyib Slaughtering in Pekanbaru, Riau
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/smartsociety.v5i2.898Keywords:
animal welfare, community education, halal slaughter, pre and post-test evaluation, qurban trainingAbstract
Qurban is an annual Islamic ritual with profound spiritual and social significance; its proper implementation is essential to ensure that meat distributed to the public complies with halal and thoyyib principles. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an education- and practice-based training programme in improving participants’ knowledge and technical skills across key domains of qurban implementation (animal eligibility, slaughterer qualifications, facilities and hygiene, animal welfare, documentation, distribution ethics, and community engagement). The programme combined counselling, hands-on training, live slaughter demonstrations, and pre- and post-test evaluations with 70 participants predominantly younger adults (19–22 years old), mostly senior high school educated, and largely employed in the private sector. Overall knowledge improved from a mean pre-test score of 3.90 to 4.11 on the post-test (t = 3.35, p < 0.01), with the largest gains in animal welfare and slaughter-facility standards (e.g., infrastructure: Δ = 0.59; t = 4.32, p < 0.01). Several domains (e.g., hygiene, documentation, distribution, and ethical and community aspects) showed smaller, occasionally non-significant improvements, indicating areas for curricular strengthening through more structured modules, demonstration-rich sessions, and role-play simulations. The findings confirm that an education- and practice-led approach effectively enhances both knowledge and operational competence among qurban committee members. Sustainability is expected to be reinforced through collaboration with religious bodies, local authorities, and halal stakeholders to uplift community-level halal and thoyyib slaughter practices.
References
Abdallah, A., Rahem, M. A., & Pasqualone, A. (2021). The multiplicity of halal standards: a case study of application to slaughterhouses. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-021-00084-6
Abidin, Z., Adawiyah, W. R., Shaferi, I., & Sodiq, A. (2024a). Financing innovation for sustainable supply chain management in social business: a case of Qurban rituals in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15(2), 342–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0250
Akram, U., Nasution, M. A. A., & Damanik, N. (2024). The Implementation of Qurban Worship in the Perspective of Sahih Hadith of Al-Bukhari: A Case Study of the Muslim Community in Tembung Village. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 11(1), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v11i1.2944
Anjum, F. M., Arshad, M. S., & Hussain, S. (2020). Factory farming and halal ethics (pp. 123–147). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118823026.ch9
Antunes, F., Pereira, L. F., Dias, Á. L., & da Silva, R. V. (2023). Flexible labour policies as competitive advantage. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24(4), 563–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00352-1
Erian, I., Sinclair, M., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2019). Knowledge of stakeholders in the livestock industries of East and Southeast Asia about welfare during transport and slaughter and its relation to their attitudes to improving animal welfare. Animals, 9(3), 99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030099
FAO, I. U. W. and W. (2023). Urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural–urban continuum, The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023. .
Fuseini, A. (2023a). Halal Slaughter of Livestock: Animal Welfare Science, History and Politics of Religious Slaughter. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17566-4**
Gaznur, Z. M., Nuraini, H., & Priyanto, R. (2020). 2. Evaluation of Halal Slaughter-Man And Human Resource Competency In Slaughterhouse Category II. Jurnal Medika Veterinaria, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21157/j.med.vet..v14i2.18586
Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2006). Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 641–653. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00605.x
Kassin, S. M. (2025). ‘Pure Science’ be damned: benefits of a case-to-lab research paradigm. Psychology, Crime and Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2025.2531389
Kelly, W. B., & Given, L. M. (2024). The community engagement for impact (CEFI) framework: an evidence-based strategy to facilitate social change. Studies in Higher Education, 49(3), 441–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2238762
Khan, R., Guo, H., Raza, S. H. A., Rahman, A., Ayaz, M., & Linsen, Z. (2018). Halal slaughtering, welfare, and empathy in farm animals: a review. Trop Anim Health Prod, 50(8), 1733–1738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1644-1
Koskinen, O. (2024). Introducing Affective Practices: Disgust in Finnish Consumers’ Everyday Meat Consumption. Cultural Sociology, 18(3), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755231153766
Lewis, C. B., & Peters, C. J. (2012). A capacity assessment of New England’s large animal slaughter facilities as relative to meat production for the regional food system. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 27(3), 192–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170511000305
Lybaert, C., Debruyne, L., Kyndt, E., & Marchand, F. (2024). Development and validation of an instrument to measure the vision of European agricultural advisors towards innovation. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 30(5), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2023.2271450
Marshall, J. P., Higginbotham, B. J., Harris, V. W., & Lee, T. R. (2007a). Assessing program outcomes: Rationale and benefits of posttest-then-retrospective-pretest designs. Journal of Youth Development, 2(1), 118–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2007.366
McDougall, J. A., Briant, K. J., Carosso, E., Cole, A. M., Dee, C., Doody, D. R., Hannon, P. A., Henderson, V., Johnson, S., Parker, M., Schwartz, S. M., & Mendoza, J. A. (2024). Data-driven community engagement: Using quantitative and qualitative data to set priorities and launch new initiatives in a growing catchment area. Preventive Oncology & Epidemiology, 2(1), 2382286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/28322134.2024.2382286
Mellor, D. J., & Uldahl, D. M. (2025). Translating Ethical Principles into Law, Regulations and Workable Animal Welfare Practices. Animals, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15060821
Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (n.d.). Al qur’an and its translation.
Muthiah, M., Lal, D. B., Bankey, B., Suresh, K., Singh, C., Dabasis, M., Ambrish, K., & Rakesh, K. (2013). Assessing extension methods for improving livestock health care in the Indian Himalayas. Mountain Research and Development, 33(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-12-00036.1
Muthoifin, M., Afiyah, I., & Nuha, null. (2024). Behavioral responses of cows and goats during slaughtering for Eid Al-Adha: A field study in Surakarta. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.2024034
Permana, I., Agustina, R., Purnamasari, E., & Salisah, F. N. (2018). A model to predict the live bodyweight of livestock using Back-propagation algorithm. Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 16(4). https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v16i4.6716
Purnamasari, E. (2015a). Aspects of qurban ritual in pekanbaru. AKADEMIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 20(2), 337–358.
Purnamasari, E. (2015b). Kualitas fisik, kimia, dan mikrobiologi daging qurban di kota pekanbaru. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Kasim Riau. https://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/11942/
Purnamasari, E., Almisri, K., Permana, I., & Dalimunthe, N. (2017). Mobile-based expert reliant system of application determining the adequacy of cows for Islamic qurban ritual using method of forward chaining. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95(11).
Ross, A., Willson, V. L., Ross, A., & Willson, V. L. (2017a). Paired samples T-test. Basic and Advanced Statistical Tests: Writing Results Sections and Creating Tables and Figures, 17–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8_4
Saeed, T. A., Ali, S. A. M. E., & Ahmed Osman, O. (2023). Halal and Kosher Slaughter Procedures in Livestock and Poultry. In O. Ahmed Osman & A. Moneim Elhadi Sulieman (Eds.), Halal and Kosher Food: Integration of Quality and Safety for Global Market Trends (pp. 107–117). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41459-6_9
Sebe, K. M. (2024). Studi Komparatif Antara Metode Ceramah Dan Demonstrasi Dalam Pembelajaran Fiqih Di Kelas 11 Ma Alkharaat Labuha. JIPDAS (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar), 2(3), 157–164. https://ejournal.lpipb.com/index.php/jipdas
Tan, K., & Ostler, T. (2025). Learning from experience. Social Work and Simulations: Teaching Practice, Research, Policy, and Social Injustices, 67. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197770498.003.0004
Ulfa, W. O., Achyar, G., & Yunus, F. M. (2025). The Abdau Tradition as a Living Hadith: Interplay of Islamic Law and Local Customs in Qurban Ritual at Tulehu, Maluku. Samarah, 9(2), 689–713. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9i2.28679
WHO. (2023). Monitoring health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Wu, R., Rebok, G. W., & Lin, F. V. (2017). A Novel Theoretical Life Course Framework for Triggering Cognitive Development across the Lifespan. Human Development, 59, 342–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000458720
Zelpina, E., Noor, P. S., Siregar, R., Sujatmiko, S., Lutfi, U. M., Amir, Y. S., & Lefiana, D. (2023). Fasciolosis Prevalence in Sacrificial Cattle of West Sumatra, Indonesia. World’s Veterinary Journal, 13(3), 420–424. https://doi.org/10.54203/SCIL.2023.WVJ46
Zsolnai, L., & Flanagan, B. (2019). The routledge international handbook of spirituality in society and the professions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445489
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Endah Purnamasari, Elfi Rahmadani, Raudhatu Shofiah, Elfawati Elfawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal retain all of the copyrights in their work. Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal, collaborates with with researchers from many countries as the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal ( e-ISSN: 2807-5757 ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal agree to the following terms:
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).

Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
