Institutional Framework for Protecting Communal Land Rights in Customary Villages (The Case Study of Pengastulan and Sumberklampok, Bali, Indonesia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/smartsociety.v6i2.1255Keywords:
Bali, Communal land rights, Customary law, Hybrid governance, Institutional theoryAbstract
Communal land rights in Bali face increasing threats from land commercialization, tourism development, and legal uncertainties, highlighting the need for robust governance mechanisms that integrate formal state regulations and customary institutions. This study examines how these institutional systems interact to protect communal land rights in Pengastulan and Sumberklampok villages. Using Scott's four-pillar institutional framework, we conducted a qualitative constructivist study involving 26 informants, including customary leaders, government officials, and community members, through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis. Results show contrasting institutional capacities: Pengastulan exhibits strong customary legitimacy, cohesive social norms, and resilient cultural practices, but faces pressures from privatization and tourism; Sumberklampok demonstrates weaker customary institutions, relying more on legal advocacy and collective mobilization due to prolonged agrarian conflicts. Findings indicate that effective communal land protection depends on the dynamic interplay of regulatory, normative, cultural-cognitive, and habitual dimensions rather than formal legal recognition alone. The study contributes theoretically by extending institutional governance frameworks to customary land contexts under legal pluralism and offers practical insights for adaptive, collaborative approaches that integrate state administration with local customary mechanisms to strengthen communal land resilience.
References
Adib, M., Saud, M., Rustinsyah, R., & Abdullah, I. (2026). The transformation of institutional capacity for social forestry policy in Java, Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 28(1), 16–28.
Afrihadi, A., Makhya, S., Rosalia, F., & Mukhlis, M. (2025). Tata Kelola Pemerintahan dalam Resolusi Konflik Masyarakat Adat: Pendekatan Manajemen Konflik berbasis Komunitas terhadap Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria Suku Anak Dalam. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik, 10(2), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.36982/jpp.v10i2.4930
Angela, K., & Setyawati, A. (2022). Analisis Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah di Atas Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat dalam Rangka Proyek Strategi Nasional (PSN) Demi Kepentingan Umum. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i3.196
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
Besley, T., & Dray, S. (2024). Trust and State Effectiveness: The Political Economy of Compliance. The Economic Journal, 134(662), 2225–2251. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae030
Burdon, W. M., & Sorour, M. K. (2020). Institutional Theory and Evolution of ‘A Legitimate’ Compliance Culture: The Case of the UK Financial Service Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(1), 47–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3981-4
Craig, R. K., Garmestani, A. S., Allen, C. R., Arnold, C. A. (Tony), Birgé, H., DeCaro, D. A., Fremier, A. K., Gosnell, H., & Schlager, E. (2017). Balancing stability and flexibility in adaptive governance: an analysis of tools available in U.S. environmental law. Ecology and Society, 22(2), art3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08983-220203
Creswell, J. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed methods Approaches (Fourth edition). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Digdowiseiso, K., Setiawan, H. D., Sugiyanto, E., & Suharyono, S. (2020). Does leadership matter in managing the village-owned enterprise? Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, (93), 115–135.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
García-Vegas, R. (2024). Capacidad institucional. EUNOMÍA. Revista En Cultura de La Legalidad, (27), 236–259. https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2024.9009
German, L., Mowo, J., Amede, T., Masuki, K. F. G. (2012). Integrated Natural resources management in the highlands of Eastern Africa: From concept to practice. Earthsacn. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203139189-15
Getz, D. (2008). Event tourism: Definition, evolution, and research. Tourism Management, 29(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.017
Ginting, A. H., Widianingsih, I., Mulyawan, R., & Nurasa, H. (2023). Village Government’s Risk Management and Village Fund Administration in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(24), 16706. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416706
Gorby, A., Hamdi, M., Mulyati, D., & Arsyad, R. (2023). Implementasi kebijakan tanah adat dan hak-hak adat di Atas Tanah di Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. PERSPEKTIF, 12(4), 1344–1360. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v12i4.10324
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.
Hampel, C. E., Lawrence, T. B., & Tracey, P. (2017). Institutional work: Taking stock and making it matter. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 558–590.
Handayani, E., Garad, A., Suyadi, A., & Tubastuvi, N. (2023). Increasing the performance of village services with good governance and participation. World Development Sustainability, 3, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100089
Handika, Y. R., Laila, E. N. N., Maulana, M. I., Aminan, M. H., & Negoro, A. H. S. (2025). Exploring Policies to Reduce Stunting in Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam: A Literature Review. ARISTO, 13(2), 586–625. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24269/ars.v13i2.10736
Jason, L. A., & Glenwick, D. S. (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods (First edition). Oxford University Press.
Joireman, S. F., & Tchatchoua-Djomo, R. (2023). Post-conflict restitution of customary land: Guidelines and trajectories of change. World Development, 168, 106272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106272
Jun, K., & Lee, J. (2023). Transformational Leadership and Followers’ Innovative Behavior: Roles of Commitment to Change and Organizational Support for Creativity. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040320
Lanzona Jr, L. A. (2019). Agrarian reform and democracy: Lessons from the Philippine experience. Millennial Asia, 10(3), 272–298.
Lynch, O. J., & Harwell, E. (2002). Whose resources? Whose common good?: towards a new paradigm of environmental justice and the national interest in Indonesia. (No Title).
Maulana, M. I., Handika, Y. R., Suryawati, D., Oktadiana, N. E., & Wardana, W. K. (2025). Strategi Pemerintah Kabupaten Banyuwangi dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Perpajakan berdasar Perspektif Indigenous Public Administration. Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Administrasi, 9(1), 57–66.
Merawati, L. K., Endiana, I. D. M., & Sunarsih, N. M. (2025). Good Governance and Trust in Village Fund. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava, 25(4), 651–675. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.25.4.4
Merta, I. N. (2024). Budaya penguasaan hak dan pengelolaan tanah ayahan desa yang berada di luar wilayah administratif desa adat (perspektif kajian budaya). Jurnal Ilmiah Hospitality, 13(2), 317–326. https://doi.org/10.47492/jih.v13i2.3728
Miles, M. B., H. A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed). SAGE Publications.
Mills, A. J., Eriksson, P., Aromaa, E., & Palo-Oja, O.-M. (2023). Mind the gap! Building bridges between institutional work and critical sensemaking. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(8), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2023-0234
Narayana, I. N. Y. (2023). The existence of customary land in Bali after the appointment of customary villages as subjects of communal property rights over land. NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan, 8(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.8.1.2023.21-31
Negoro, A. H. S., Helpiastuti, S. B., Pamungkas, T. S., Handika, Y. R., Maulana, M. I., & Laila, E. N. N. (2026). Agile Governance in Village Public Services: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adaptive Capacity in East Java. Indonesian Journal of Social Research, 8(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v8i1.781
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.
Prayitno, G., Subagiyo, A., Dinanti, D., Rahmawati, Nisak, F. F., & Biloshkurskyi, M. V. (2026). Social Capital and Adaptive Governance: Pathways to Sustainability in Indonesia’s Tourism Villages. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70807
Rahmawati, R., Jumarto, Alpy, M., Syafii, M., Satispi, E., & Salam, R. (2025). The Influence of Institutional Capacity on the Implementation of Smart Villages in the Development of Village. Indonesian Journal of Social Research (IJSR), 7(1), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v7i1.609
Roengtam, S., Agustiyara, A., & Nurmandi, A. (2023). Making Network Governance Work in Forest Land-Use Policy in the Local Government. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231194491
Saadah, M., & Agustiyara, A. (2024). Transformational Leadership and Dynamic Managerial Capabilities in Public Sector Innovation. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(1), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.201-214
Sabatier, P. A. (1991). Toward better theories of the policy process. PS: Political Science & Politics, 24(2), 147–156.
Sarah J. Tracy. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact (First edition). Wiley Blackwell.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications.
Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development, 37(2), 460–484.
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.
Setijaningrum, E., Mardiyanta, A., Wardiyanto, B., & Samad, S. A. (2025). When Silence Speaks: Public Service Innovation, Village Authority, and the Negotiation of Traditional Justice in Rural Indonesia’s Youth Protection System. Social Sciences, 14(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14010022
Sulaiman, A. I., Rosyadi, S., Handoko, W., Masrukin, M., Putri, D. D., Wijayanti, I. K. E., & Faozanudin, M. (2024). The Importance of Participatory Communication in Development Planning Deliberations for Agritourism Village Enhancement. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 144–160. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v24i1.246
Suryawati, D., Rohman, H., Anwar, Maulana, M. I., Handika, Y. R., Hanim, A. N., Muluk, M. R. K., & Rochman, F. (2026). Adaptive governance in fiscal decentralization: Insight from institutional reform in Banyuwangi Regency, Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102606
Tjoetra, A., Khairi, A., Mardhiah, N., & Marefanda, N. (2025). Community-Centric Governance: Unveiling the Challenges and Strategies in West Aceh Villages. Intellectual Discourse, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.31436/id.v33i3.2052
Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Wahyuningrat, W., Rosyad, S., Yamin, M., Darmawan, A., Runtiko, A. G., Wijaya, S. S., Gunarto, G., Nurain, H., Sulaiman, A. I., & Ahmad, A. A. (2024). Does rural development enable community empowerment? Evidence from village fund in Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(1). https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.1.00453
Widjaja, G., Pathak, R., Singh, B. P., Kem, D., Dreisbach, S. M., Al-Kassem, A. H., & Singh, C. S. (2024). Policy palette: A spectrum of legal and educational challenges in the political landscape. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(10), 7053. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.7053
Wijaya, S. O., Pratidhatama, T. H., & Jayane Harto, I. R. A. (2022). Kedudukan hukum tanah adat pasca ditetapkan hukum agraria nasional. Jurnal Education and Development, 11(1), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v11i1.4444
Windia, I. W. (2013). Subak warisan budaya dunia. Udayana University Press.
Wiwin, I. W. (2026). Implementasi Tri Hita Karana dalam Pengembangan Ekowisata Menuju Pariwisata Berkelanjutan di Bukit Cemeng Kabupaten Bangli. Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 11(2), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2021.v11.i02.p06
Zheng, H. (2026). Crisis-driven governance reforms: An analytical framework of institutional capacity, leadership, and collaboration in global governance. Chinese Public Administration Review, 17(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754251335231
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Nyoman Alit Badrika, I Ketut Mastika, Agus Trihartono, Suji Suji, I Wayan Madra Suartana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal retain all of the copyrights in their work. Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal, collaborates with with researchers from many countries as the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal ( e-ISSN: 2807-5757 ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal agree to the following terms:
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).

Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

