Implementation of E-PACE Mobile in Improving the Quality of Non-Business Licensing Services in West Papua Province

Yakobus Richard  Murafer; Terianus Luther Safkaur; Eduard Metusala Johanis  Kocu; Jackson Yumame; Melpayanty  Sinaga

doi:10.58524/smartsociety.v6i2.1185

Authors

Yakobus Richard Murafer Cenderawasih University, Indonesia
Terianus Luther Safkaur Cenderawasih University, Indonesia
Eduard Metusala Johanis Kocu Cenderawasih University, Indonesia
Jackson Yumame Cenderawasih University, Indonesia
Melpayanty Sinaga Cenderawasih University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58524/smartsociety.v6i2.1185

Keywords:

E-PACE Mobile, Public Services , Non-Business Licensing, E-GovQual, West Papua

Abstract

Digital transformation has become central to improving public service quality, yet evidence on how mobile government applications perform in remote and infrastructure-constrained regions remains limited. This study evaluates the implementation of E-PACE Mobile, a front-end application integrated with the SiCANTIK Cloud ecosystem, at the West Papua Province Investment and One-Stop Integrated Service Agency (DPMPTSP), and assesses its contribution to improving the quality of non-business licensing services in line with SDG 16. A single embedded qualitative case study design was employed, with four sub-units of analysis (application features, institutional framework, infrastructure, and users), supported by document analysis as the primary data collection technique. Primary textual data were obtained from institutional documents of the DPMPTSP, evaluation reports of the Indonesian Ombudsman (2022–2025), documentation of the E-PACE Mobile system, and official statistical data of the BPS, and analyzed using a hybrid deductive–inductive thematic approach framed by the E-GovQual dimensions and the Technology–Organisation–Environment (TOE) framework. The findings indicate that E-PACE Mobile enhances service efficiency through its Digital Approval feature and strengthens transparency via cryptography-based QR code permit verification. However, service reliability is constrained by rural internet access, which stands at only 55.75%. Citizen support remains the weakest dimension due to the absence of an integrated helpdesk, and the organisational capacity paradox (strong political commitment coupled with technical staff limitations) restricts scalability. This study makes three theoretical contributions: (1) the addition of territorial logistical efficiency as a new E-GovQual metric relevant to island and mountainous regions, (2) the proposal of a cultural sub-dimension within the TOE Environment component, and (3) the formalisation of the organisational capacity paradox as a structural pattern of e-government in Indonesia’s 3T regions. In practical terms, the expansion of E-PACE Mobile should be approached sequentially, beginning with the reinforcement of 4G telecommunications infrastructure in districts classified as 'red zones', followed by the integration of WhatsApp/SMS-based help desks and community-based digital ambassador programmes. This approach will ensure that the implementation of E-PACE Mobile does not exacerbate existing service inequalities.

References

Akpan-Obong, P. I., Trinh, M. P., Ayo, C. K., & Oni, A. (2023). E-Governance as good governance? evidence from 15 West African countries. Information Technology for Development, 29(2–3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2123770

Alfiys.group. (2025, November 17). E-PACE mobile papua barat - aplikasi di google play. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.epace_dpmptsp_papuabarat&hl=id

Aljukhadar, M., Belisle, J.-F., Dantas, D. C., Sénécal, S., & Titah, R. (2022). Measuring the service quality of governmental sites: Development and validation of the e-Government service quality (EGSQUAL) scale. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 55, 101182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2022.101182

Alkraiji, A., & Ameen, N. (2021). The impact of service quality, trust and satisfaction on young citizen loyalty towards government e-services. Information Technology & People, 35(4), 1239–1270. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2020-0229

Alsaad, A., Alkhawaldeh, A., Elrehail, H., & Almomani, R. (2024). Linking e-government development and quality of governance to trust in government: evidence from OECD member countries. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(4), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-03-2024-0060

Andry, A., & Sawir, M. (2024). Membangun budaya pelayanan publik yang ramah: Implementasi teknologi digital dalam birokrasi pemerintahan. Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP), 6(2), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v6i2.1557

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

BPS. (2025). Provinsi Papua Barat Dalam Angka 2025.

Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2025). Design characteristics and service experience with e-government services: A public value perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 80, 102834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102834

Demarest, L., & Veenendaal, W. (2024). Closer to the people? Determinants of citizen–MP contact in Africa. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12485

Dimas, M., & Fahlevvi, M. R. (2024). Pengentasan digital divide dalam penerapan e-government di Kabupaten Sumbawa. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Komunikasi Pemerintahan, 6(2), 194–215. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtkp.v6i2.4504

Duri, R., Hidayat, B. A., & Sinaga, R. D. (2024). Effectiveness of the Online Single Submission Risk- Based Approach (OSS RBA). Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 8(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.8.2.2024.103-116

Fraisl, D., Neves, M., Seidu, O., Darpoh, C. K., Basnyat, A., Usheva, F., Tungbani, B., Ankamah, D., See, L., & Gadgil, A. (2025). Leveraging citizen data to improve public services and measure progress toward Sustainable Development Goal 16. Sustainable Development, 33, 5968–5982. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3441

Gainau, A. W. (2023). Application of E-Government in efforts to improve public services (Study in Papua Province). Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(5), 651-662. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v2i5.4402

Garda Papua. (2024, March 24). Targetkan kemudahan pelayanan perizinan usaha bagi masyarakat, DPM-PTSP Papua Barat Gelar Sosialisasi OSS-RBA.

Halaris, C., Magoutas, B., Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2007). Classification and synthesis of quality approaches in e‐government services. Internet Research, 17(4), 378–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240710828058

Jacobson, D. (2020). Naturalistic inquiry. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2nd ed., pp. 267–272). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10579-7

Ji, Y. (2024). A methodological exploration of document analysis as a qualitative research method. Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 10(3), 25-56. https://doi.org/10.30940/jqi.2024.10.3.25

Kanaan, A., AL-Hawamleh, A., Abulfaraj, A., Al-Kaseasbeh, H. M., & Alorfi, A. (2023). The effect of quality, security and privacy factors on trust and intention to use e-government services. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.11.004

Khan, A., Krishnan, S., & Dhir, A. (2021). Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120737

Li, W., & Xue, L. (2021). Analyzing the critical factors influencing post-use trust and its impact on citizens’ continuous-use intention of e-government: Evidence from chinese municipalities. Sustainability, 13(14), 7698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147698

Lumbanraja, D. (2020). Urgensi transformasi pelayanan publik melalui e-government pada new normal dan reformasi regulasi birokrasi. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(2), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i2.220-231

Mandari, H., & Koloseni, D. (2022). Examining the antecedents of continuance usage of mobile government services in Tanzania. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(12), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1945622

Mao, Z., Zou, Q., Bu, T., Dong, Y., & Yan, R. (2023). Understanding the role of service quality of government apps in continuance intention: An expectation–confirmation perspective. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231201218

Mensah, I. K. (2020). Impact of government capacity and e-government performance on the adoption of e-government services. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628059

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Mukhlish, A., Olivia, F., & Kusuma, A. (2024). Menyibak ilusi ideologi dalam pemberian izin pertambangan bagi organisasi masyarakat keagamaan sebagai upaya pembangunan nasional. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum.

Nafi’ah, B. A. (2023). Local government expansion of mobile governance during the pandemic. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i2.1129

Nguyen, T. T., Phan, D. M., Le, A. H., & Nguyen, L. T. N. (2020). The determinants of citizens’ satisfaction of e-government: an empirical study in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.519

Ninan, J. (2020). Online naturalistic inquiry in project management research: Directions for research. Project Leadership and Society, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2020.100002

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Olumekor, M., Mangai, M. S., Madumo, O. S., Mohiuddin, M., & Polbitsyn, S. N. (2024). Influences on e‐governance in Africa: A study of economic, political, and infrastructural dynamics. Public Administration, 103(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13013

Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2025). Ringkasan Eksekutif Penilaian Kepatuhan 2024.

Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2026). Ringkasan eksekutif opini ombudsman RI: penilaian maladministrasi pelayanan publik tahun 2025.

Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.011

Poornima, M. (2017). Unit-5: Theories of leadership. In Block-2: Concept of Leadership. Indira Gandhi National Open University. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/8007

Pribadi, U., & Kim, H.-J. (2022). Impacts of cultural behavior of civil servants on citizens' satisfaction: A survey on licensing services of Indonesian local government agencies. Journal of Public Affairs, 22, e2662. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2662

Putri, E., Bandi, B., Widarjo, W., & Arifin, T. (2025). The value of cloud accounting for MSMEs: a Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework perspective. Cogent Business and Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2494712

Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., & Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973

Rosidi, D. (2022). implementasi kebijakan perizinan berusaha berbasis resiko (OSS-RBA) di Dinas Penanaman Modal Dan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (DPMPTSP) Di Kabupaten Subang. The World of Public Administration Journal, 4(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.37950/wpaj.v4i2.1492

Sabani, A. (2021). Investigating the influence of transparency on the adoption of e-Government in Indonesia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2020-0046

Suhartoyo, S. (2019). Implementasi fungsi pelayanan publik dalam pelayanan terpadu satu pintu (PTSP). Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(1), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i1.143-154

Syarifah, S., Muksin, D., & Fadlan, M. (2023). Analisis faktor implementasi e-government di Kabupaten Jayawijaya Papua. Journal of Social Politics and Governance (JSPG), 5(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.24076/jspg.v5i2.1478

UN DESA. (2024). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024. UN DESA.

United Nations. (2024a). SDG indicators metadata repository: Indicator 16.6.2. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/

United Nations. (2024b). United nations e-government survey 2024: Accelerating digital transformation for sustainable development. https://publicadministration.un.org/en/

Villamin, P., Lopez, V., Thapa, D. K., & Cleary, M. (2025). A worked example of qualitative descriptive design: a step‐by‐step guide for novice and early career researchers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(8), 5181–5195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16481

Yamamoto, K., Nasu, K., Nakayoshi, Y., & Takase, M. (2024). Sustaining the nursing workforce - exploring enabling and motivating factors for the retention of returning nurses: a qualitative descriptive design. BMC Nursing, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01900-5

Yanti, H., & Handayani, S. W. (2022). Penerapan aplikasi sicantik cloud terhadap pelayanan di DPMPTSP Banda Aceh. Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v10i1.4758

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(1).

Zhang, M., Zhao, X., Xue, Y., Yang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A meta-analysis of how the culture and technical development level influence citizens’ adoption of m-government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211057358