Understanding Purchase Intention through Customer Relationship Management, Brand Equity, and Perceived Value: A Qualitative Study of Modern Retail Consumers in Sumatra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/smartsociety.v6i1.1065Keywords:
consumer relationship management, brand equity, modern retail, perceived value, purchase intentionAbstract
In the increasingly competitive modern retail context, understanding the formation of purchase intentions has become essential. Accordingly, this study aims to explore how purchase intentions are shaped through customer relationship management (CRM), brand equity, and perceived value, while also considering the roles of perceived product quality and price perception among modern retail consumers in Sumatra. To achieve this objective, an exploratory qualitative approach was employed to capture consumers’ experiences and subjective interpretations in the purchase decision-making process. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with regular customers of modern retail outlets in Sumatra and subsequently analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and key themes. The findings indicate that purchase intentions are formed through an integrative evaluative process rather than through isolated assessments of product attributes. In this process, CRM fosters trust and emotional comfort, while brand equity reduces perceived risk by providing a sense of consistency and reliability. Furthermore, perceptions of product quality and price are interpreted contextually, shaping consumers’ judgments of fairness and functional value. These elements ultimately converge in perceived value, which acts as a central mechanism linking consumer experiences to purchase intentions. Overall, this study contributes to the marketing literature by offering a more context-sensitive understanding of purchase intention formation and provides practical insights for retailers in developing relationship-oriented and value-based strategies.
References
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. Free Press.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Aliya, S. N., Anwar, A., Abadi, R. R., Musa, M. I., Wardhana, M. I., & Haeruddin, H. (2026). Pengaruh Kualitas Produk Terhadap Niat Beli Ulang Dengan Kepuasan Pelanggan Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Produk Glad2Glow ( Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Manajemen ). Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business (RIGGS), 5(1), 4927–4943.
Aziz, S. A., & Albari, A. (2023). Pengaruh Kepercayaan Merek dan Nilai yang Dirasakan terhadap Preferensi Merek dan Niat Beli Ponsel Merek Samsung di Indonesia. Selekta Manajemen: Jurnal Mahasiswa Bisnis & Manajemen, 02(01), 156–168.
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(3), 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/209535
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th Editio). SAGE Publications.
De Cannière, M. H., De Pelsmacker, P., & Geuens, M. (2009). Relationship Quality and the Theory of Planned Behavior models of behavioral intentions and purchase behavior. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.001
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Endarwati, E. T., Indriany, Y., Suarniki, N. N., & Pratiwi, L. (2024). The Effect of Product Personalization , User Experience , and Consumer Trust on the Level of E-Commerce Consumer Satisfaction in Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnisman: Riset Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 06(01), 163–179.
Erislan, E. (2025). Analysis of the Influence of Brand Equity on Consumer Purchase Decisions in the Modern Retail Market. Mandalika Journal of Business and Management Studies, 3(1), 68–74.
Febrian, A., & Ahluwalia, L. (2020). Analisis pengaruh ekuitas merek pada kepuasan dan keterlibatan pelanggan yang berimplikasi pada niat pembelian di E-Commerce. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapam, 13(34), 254–273.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1086/209515
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hakim, L., Susanti, N., & Ujianto, U. (2017). Influence of Customer Relationship Management , Brand Equity , Perceived Product Quality , Perceived Price on Customer Value and Purchase Intention ( Studies Philips Light Bulb in Batam ). International Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(7), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v9n7p122
Holbrook, M. (2002). Consumer Value A Framework for Analysis and Research. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203010679
Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., Singh, J. J., & Sierra, V. (2019). Do Customer Perceptions of Corporate Services Brand Ethicality Improve Brand Equity? Considering the Roles of Brand Heritage, Brand Image, and Recognition Benefits. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3455-0
Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kytö, E., Virtanen, M., & Mustonen, S. (2019). From intention to action: Predicting purchase behavior with consumers’ product expectations and perceptions, and their individual properties. Food Quality and Preference, 75(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.02.002
Langit, R. D., & Asikin, M. (2025). Pengaruh Pengalaman Pelanggan , Kepercayaan , dan Nilai yang Dirasakan terhadap Niat Pembelian Kembali pada Konsumen Toko TikTok di Indonesia dengan Citra Merek sebagai Mediasi Variabel. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1(2), 45–57.
Latifah, S. Z., & Fikriah, N. L. (2024). Perceived value dan brand trust terhadap purchase intention dengan mediasi brand preference. Journal of Management and Digital Business, 4(2), 383–395.
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding Customer Experience Throughout the Customer Journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44134974
Lestari, S. (2026). Digital Marketing Strategies , Consumer Behavior , and Competitive Advantage in the Global Business Environment. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 14(1), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v14i1.4560
Li, Y., Cai, J., Wang, Y., & Chen, S. (2025). How attachment affects platform revisit and repurchase intentions: a perspective from attachment theory. Current Psychology, 44(6), 5267–5278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07455-1
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Malc, D., Selinšek, A., Dlačić, J., & Milfelner, B. (2021). Exploring the emotional side of price fairness perceptions and its consequences. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 1931–1948. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860790
Menhard, M., Syafwandi, S., & Yulasmi, Y. (2025). Social Media , Price Perception , and Repurchase Intention : The Role of Trust. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(5), 3675–3678. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i5.3717
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd Editio). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-data-analysis/book246128
Morgan, Robert M, & Hunt, Shelby D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302
Nations, U. (2023a). Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal12
Nations, U. (2023b). Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal8
Nations, U. (2023c). Goal 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal9
Nugroho, M. A., Heriyadi, H., Ilzar, D., Juniwati, J., & Wenny, P. (2025). The Influence of Perceived Value and Product Quality on Purchase Intention with Brand Trust as a Mediating Varia- ble : A Study on Rucas Limited Edition Products. EPaper Bisnis : International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management, 2(2), 74–89.
Octaviani, D., & Ekawati, E. (2023). Analisis Mediasi Kepuasan Pelanggan dalam Hubungan Customer Experience dan Minat Beli Ulang di Aming Coffee Pontianak. Jurnal Ekonomi STIEP, 8(2), 198–206.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Payne, Adrian, & Frow, Pennie. (2005). A Strategic Framework for Customer Relationship Management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.167
Prasetyo, R. A., Siregar, A. R., & Phuc, T. H. (2025). The Mediating Role of Brand Trust in the Relationship between Social Media Marketing and Purchase Intention. Journal of Economics and Management, 3(3), 85–94.
Rijkard, M. (2025). Pengaruh Brand Trust, Brand Image dan Content Marketing Terhadap Purchase Behavior dengan Mediasi Puchase Intention Pada Konsumen UMKM Manika Kaltim. J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(2), 1322–1337. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i2.6793
Rosada, A., & Setiawan, W. (2025). Peran Brand Trust pada Pengaruh Online Customer Review dan Perceived Value terhadap Purchase Intention. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 5(3), 384–395.
Rusti, A. D., Masnita, Y., & Kurniawati, K. (2024). Tinjauan Theory of Planned Behavior dalam Mempengaruhi Purchase Intention dan Purchase Behavior melalui Social Media. Jurnal Ekonomi Efektif, 7(1), 116–130.
Sander, D. A., Chan, A., & Muhyi, H. A. (2021). Jurnal sains pemasaran indonesia. Jurnal Sains Pemasaran Indonesia, 20(3), 241–257.
Sanjaya, E. (2012). PENGARUH BRAND EQUITY TERHADAP PURCHASE INTENTION MELALUI BRAND PREFERENCE PADA PRODUK PT. SUNLIFE FINANCIAL DI SURABAYA. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Manajemen, 1(5), 1–7.
Sari, N., & Nurhadi, N. (2025). Pentingnya Kepercayaan Pelanggan dan Kualitas Produk dalam Meningkatkan Niat Pembelian Ulang di E-commerce. Jurnal Sinabis, 1(1), 240–244.
Setiawan, L. F., Efrata, T. C., & Padmawidjaja, L. (2023). PENGARUH BRAND AWARENESSS, BRAND ASSOCIATION DAN PERCEIVED QUALITY TERHADAP PURCHASE INTENTION DENGAN MEDIASI BRAND EQUITY PADA PRODUK BAN IRC DI CV. RAJAWALI INTI SUKSES. Jurnal Performa: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Start-up Bisnis, 8(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.37715/jp.v8i1.3071
Setyaningrum, A. O. P., & Dewi, L. (2025). PENGARUH SERVICE QUALITY TERHADAP PURCHASE INTENTION DENGAN PERCEIVED VALUE SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING ( STUDI PADA KARTU KREDIT BANK BRI KANTOR WILAYAH SURABAYA ). Jurnal Manajemen Terapan Dan Keuangan (Mankeu), 14(04), 1932–1947.
Statistik, B. P. (2025). Profil Perdagangan Indonesia 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2025/12/31/1b526749c21a883818c1c74d/profil-perdagangan-indonesia-2024.html
Tresna, P. W., Chan, A., & Herawaty, T. (2021). THE EFFECT OF BRAND EQUITY ON PURCHASE DECISIONS (STUDY ON SHOPEE CONSUMER) Pratami. AdBispreneur : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 6(1), 1–11.
Tulebayeva, N. T., & Kozhamkulova, Z. T. (2025). Research of consumer behavior in the context of digitalization in the retail sector: the quantitative approach. Journal of Economic Research & Business Administration, 153(3), 63–85.
Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). From Multi-Channel Retailing to Omni-Channel Retailing: Introduction to the Special Issue on Multi-Channel Retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 174–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.02.005
Viglia, G., & Abrate, G. (2014). How social comparison influences reference price formation in a service context. Journal of Economic Psychology, 45, 168–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2014.09.003
Wardhana, A. (2024). Perilaku Konsumen di Era Digital (M. Pradana (Ed.)). EUREKA MEDIA AKSARA.
Xu, Z., Song, Z., & Fong, K.-Y. (2025). Perceived Price Fairness as a Mediator in Customer Green Consumption : Insights from the New Energy Vehicle Industry and Sustainable Practices. Sustainability, 17(166), 1–22.
Yatnikaputri, F. F., & Hidayat, A. (2025). Analisis Pengaruh Social Interaction Dan Brand Awareness Terhadap Purchase Intention Pada Tiktok : Mediasi Oleh Trust. JPEK (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan), 9(3), 1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.29408/jpek.v9i3.31492
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hakim Lukmanul, Mon Korcharoen, Tibrani Tibrani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal retain all of the copyrights in their work. Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal, collaborates with with researchers from many countries as the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal ( e-ISSN: 2807-5757 ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal agree to the following terms:
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).

Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

