Relative age effect in volleyball: Does early birth influence elite success?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jcss.v5i3.1272Keywords:
Athlete development, Relative age effect, Tactical performance, Talent identification, VolleyballAbstract
Background: The Relative Age Effect (RAE) refers to the unequal representation of athletes according to their birth timing within a selection year. This phenomenon may influence talent identification, athlete development, and access to competitive opportunities. However, limited evidence is available regarding the relationship between RAE, playing-position distribution, and tactical-technical performance among competitive university volleyball players in India.
Aims: This study examined the presence of RAE and its association with playing positions and tactical-technical performance among male volleyball players competing at the national inter-university level in Tamil Nadu, India.
Methods: A cross-sectional observational design involved 160 male players from universities in Tamil Nadu who participated in national inter-university tournaments during the 2024–2025 season. Participants were classified into four birth quartiles: Q1 (January–March), Q2 (April–June), Q3 (July–September), and Q4 (October–December). Playing positions and performance indicators, including attack efficiency, block success, serve pressure, reception efficiency, and overall performance index, were analyzed using chi-square goodness-of-fit tests and the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Results: A significant unequal distribution of players was observed across the birth quartiles (χ² = 10.40, p = 0.015, Cohen’s w = 0.25). Players born in Q1 represented 32.5% of the sample, whereas those born in Q4 accounted for 17.5%, with Q1 players being approximately 1.86 times more likely to be represented than Q4 players. Significant position-specific differences were identified among opposite hitters (χ² = 8.11, p = 0.04) and middle blockers (χ² = 9.02, p = 0.02). However, no significant differences were found across birth quartiles in attack efficiency, block success, serve pressure, reception efficiency, or overall performance index (p > 0.05; η² = 0.008–0.014).
Conclusion: RAE remained evident in player representation and positional distribution but was not associated with tactical-technical performance. These findings suggest that birth timing may influence selection opportunities more than actual competitive ability. Talent identification should therefore use multidimensional criteria and prioritize athletes’ long-term developmental potential rather than age-related physical advantages.
References
Aku, Y., & Yang, C. (2024). The relative age effect and its influence on athletic performance in Chinese junior female tennis players. PLoS ONE, 19(3), e0298975. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298975
Albaladejo-Saura, M., Vaquero-Cristóbal, R., García-Roca, J. A., & Esparza-Ros, F. (2022). The effect of age, biological maturation and birth quartile in the kinanthropometric and physical fitness differences between male and female adolescent volleyball players. Children, 9(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9010058
Andronikos, G., Elumaro, A. I., Westbury, T., & Martindale, R. J. J. (2016). Relative age effect: Implications for effective practice. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(12), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1093647
Anguera Argilaga, MT, Blanco Villaseñor, Ángel, Hernández Mendo, A., & Losada López, JL (2011). Observational Designs: Adjustment and application in sport psychology. Cuadernos De Psicología Del Deporte , 11 (2), 63–76. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/133241
Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). A classification system for research designs in psychology. Anales De Psicología Annals of Psychology, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Ávila-Martínez, J. D., Castro-Malaver, M. A., Becerra-Patiño, B. A., Varón-Murcia, J., Cárdenas-Contreras, S., & Pino-Ortega, J. (2024). Gender differences for the relative age effect on physical skills and emotional intelligence in child volleyball and soccer athletes. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 9(4), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9040244
Baker, J., Young, B. W., & Mann, D. (2017). Advances in athlete development: Understanding conditions of and constraints on optimal practice. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.005
Becerra-Patiño, B. A., Varón-Murcia, J. J., Cárdenas-Contreras, S., Castro-Malaver, M. A., & Ávila-Martínez, J. D. (2024). Scientific production on the relative age effect in sport: Bibliometric analysis of the last 9 years (2015–2023). Retos, 52, 623–638. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v52.101944
Bezuglov, E., Malyakin, G., Emanov, A., Malyshev, G., Shoshorina, M., Savin, E., Lazarev, A., & Morgans, R. (2023). Are late-born young soccer players less mature than their early-born peers, although no differences in physical and technical performance are evident?. Sports, 11(9), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11090179
Bhengu, P., Roman, N. V., & Filies, G. C. (2026). Revealing disparities: An exploration of talent identification and sports development among youth. European Journal for Sport and Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/16138171.2026.2665888
Brustio, P. R., Boccia, G., Abbott, S., La Torre, A., Rainoldi, A., & Cobley, S. (2024). Mitigating against relative age effects in youth track & field: Validating corrective adjustment procedures across multiple events. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 27(9), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2024.05.009
Brustio, P. R., Boccia, G., De Pasquale, P., Lupo, C., & Ungureanu, A. N. (2022). Small relative age effect appears in professional female Italian team sports. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(385), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010385
Campos, F. A. D., Pellegrinotti, Í. L., Campos, L. C. B., Dias, T. M. R., & Gómez, M. Á. (2020). Relative age effect in the girls’ volleyball U18 world championship. Journal of Human Kinetics, 72, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0106
Cobley, S., Baker, J., Wattie, N., & McKenna, J. (2009). Annual age-grouping and athlete development: A meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport. Sports Medicine, 39(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939030-00005
De la Rubia, A., Lorenzo-Calvo, J., & Lorenzo, A. (2020). Does the relative age effect influence short-term performance and sport career in team sports? A qualitative systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1947. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01947
De Oliveira Castro, H., De Oliveira, V., De Souza Rocha, M., Figueiredo de Souza, W., De Castro Ribeiro, L., Adriano Gomes, S., & Savassi Figueiredo, L. (2024). The relative age effect based on playing-position and performance on brazilian elite men’s basketball. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte, 24(3), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.612221
Delorme, N., Boiché, J., & Raspaud, M. (2010). Relative age effect in female sport: A diachronic examination of soccer players. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 20(3), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00979.x
Drikos, S., Fatahi, A., Molavian, R., Ahmed Al-Ryami, S. A., Sotiropoulos, K., & Barzouka, K. (2025). Volleyball: Similar game for men and women? Factors characterising successful performance in olympic games 2021 regarding genders. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 25(3), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2024.2411870
Dudink, A. (1994). Birth date and sporting success. Nature, 368(6472), 592. https://doi.org/10.1038/368592a0
Finnegan, L., van Rijbroek, M., Oliva-Lozano, J. M., Cost, R., & Andrew, M. (2024). Relative age effect across the talent identification process of youth female soccer players in the United States: Influence of birth year, position, biological maturation, and skill level. Biology of Sport, 41(4), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.136085
Fitzgerald, F., Campbell, M., Kearney, P. E., & Cumming, S. (2024). Exploring the existence, strength, and independence of relative age and maturation selection biases: A case study in Gaelic football talent development programmes. Annals of Human Biology, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460.2024.2349040
Garcia-de-Alcaraz, A., Pessoa da Costa, Y., & Ricarte Batista, G. (2022). Exploring the relative age effect in Spanish beach volleyball players. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(10), 2604–2610. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.10330
Grigoletto, A., Mauro, M., & Toselli, S. (2023). Differences in body composition and maturity status in young male volleyball players of different levels. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology, 8(4), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk8040162
Işık, M., Yavuz, M., Dişçeken, O., Ceylan, H. İ., Öksüz, T., & Demir, K. (2025). Positional relative age effect in Europe’s top ten football leagues. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 17(1), 258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01312-1
Joyner, P. W., Lewis, J. S., Dawood, R. S., Mallon, W. J., Kirkendall, D. T., & Garrett, W. E. Jr. (2017). Relative age effect: Beyond the youth phenomenon. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 14(4), 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827617743423
Kelly, A. L., Calvo, A. L., dos Santos, S. D. L., & Jiménez Sáiz, S. L. (2022). Special issue “talent identification and development in youth sports”. Sports, 10(12), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports10120189
Keoliya, A. A., Ramteke, S. U., Boob, M. A., & Somaiya, K. J. (2024). Enhancing volleyball athlete performance: A comprehensive review of training interventions and their impact on agility, explosive power, and strength. Cureus, 16(1), e53273. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.53273
Leyhr, D., Rösch, D., Cumming, S. P., & Höner, O. (2024). Selection-dependent differences in youth elite basketball players’ relative age, maturation-related characteristics, and motor performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 95(3), 775–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2311644
McCarthy, N., Taylor, J., Cruickshank, A., & Collins, D. (2022). Happy birthday? Relative age benefits and decrements on the rocky road. Sports, 10(6), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports10060082
Ntozis, C., Barzouka, K., Skouras, A. Z., Cherouveim, E., Papitsi, F., Apostolidis, N., & Tsolakis, C. (2024). Relative age effect for different playing positions in adolescent female volleyball players. International Journal of Exercise Science, 17(4), 1553–1567. https://doi.org/10.70252/NWKF3764
Palani, B., Raj, Y. C. L., & Sanjaykumar, S. (2024). Correlating anthropometric parameters with lower limb muscle strength: On the example of female volleyball players. Physical Rehabilitation and Recreational Health Technologies, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.15391/prrht.2024-9(3).02
Rebelo, A. P., Pereira, J. R., Cunha, P., Coelho-e-Silva, M. J., & Valente-dos-Santos, J. (2024). Training stress, neuromuscular fatigue and well-being in volleyball: A systematic review. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 16, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-024-00807-7
Redman, G., Pierce, S., & Kelly, A. L. (2025). Chaos caused by different cutoff dates: Relative age effects and redshirting in collegiate volleyball in the United States. Sports, 13(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13020053
Rey, E., Costa, P. B., Corredoira, F. J., & de Rellán Guerra, A. S. (2023). Effects of age on physical match performance in professional soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 37(6), 1244–1249. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003244
Rubajczyk, K., & Rokita, A. (2020). The relative age effect and talent identification factors in youth volleyball in Poland. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01445
Schorer, J., Büsch, D., Faber, I., et al. (2025). Retrospective analyses of stability and variability in relative age effects of handball talents over seventeen years. Sports Medicine - Open, 11, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-024-00797-3
Shen, Y., Li, M., & Yang, Q. (2026). Variations in the technical performance of elite female volleyball: Evidence from a new round model. Scientific Reports, 16, 5823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36371-y
Sliwa, M., Buszta, M., & Sadowski, J. (2024). Relative age effect at men’s volleyball world championships over time. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 16(2), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.29359/BJHPA.16.2.09
Sweeney, L., Cumming, S. P., MacNamara, Á., & Horan, D. (2023). A tale of two selection biases: The independent effects of relative age and biological maturity on player selection in the Football Association of Ireland’s national talent pathway. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 18(6), 1992–2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541221126152
Toselli, S., Mauro, M., Grigoletto, A., Cataldi, S., Benedetti, L., Nanni, G., Di Miceli, R., Aiello, P., Gallamini, D., Fischetti, F., & Greco, G. (2022). Maturation selection biases and relative age effect in Italian soccer players of different levels. Biology, 11(11), 1559. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11111559
Wang, J., & Tian, H. (2024). Serious leisure and successful aging among elderly air volleyball players: Examining the mediating role of social support and flow experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1403373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403373
Wattie, N., Schorer, J., & Baker, J. (2015). The relative age effect in sport: A developmental systems model. Sports Medicine, 45(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0248-9
Yang, F., Lu, C., Yun, X., & Qian, C. (2026). Effects of neuromuscular training on stability in volleyball athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 7, 1724934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1724934
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kamesh Arul Doss, Gokul Raj, Swamynathan Sanjaykumar, Shinto Vadakkumchery Poulose, Igor Grygus, Yuliya Kalmykova, Priyanka Rana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
