Learning cycle 9E integrated with instructional videos for enhancing numeracy literacy among prospective mathematics teachers: A quasi-experimental study

Siska Andriani; Rizki Wahyu Yunian Putra; Indah Resti Ayuni Suri; Abi Fadila

doi:10.58524/jasme.v6i3.1394

Authors

Siska Andriani Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
Rizki Wahyu Yunian Putra Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
Indah Resti Ayuni Suri Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia
Abi Fadila Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i3.1394

Keywords:

Instructional Videos, Learning Cycle 9E, Numeracy Literacy, Prospective Mathematics Teachers, Technology-Enhanced Learning

Abstract

Background: Numeracy literacy is a fundamental competency that enables prospective mathematics teachers to interpret, analyze, and apply mathematical knowledge in authentic contexts. However, conventional mathematics instruction often emphasizes procedural proficiency rather than contextual reasoning, resulting in limited numeracy literacy development. Integrating constructivist learning with technology-enhanced instruction offers a promising approach to addressing this challenge.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Learning Cycle 9E model integrated with instructional videos in enhancing the numeracy literacy of prospective mathematics teachers.

Method: A quasi-experimental study employing a pretest–posttest control group design was conducted with 50 undergraduate students enrolled in the Mathematics Education Study Program at Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia. Participants were assigned to an experimental group (n = 25) and a control group (n = 25). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, normalized gain (N-Gain), an independent samples t-test, and Cohen’s d effect size.

Results: The experimental group outperformed the control group, achieving a higher posttest mean score (84.16 vs. 71.04) and N-Gain (0.62 vs. 0.31). A significant difference was identified between the groups (t = 6.485, p < .001), accompanied by a large effect size (d = 1.84).

Conclusion: Integrating the Learning Cycle 9E model with instructional videos effectively enhances numeracy literacy by fostering active knowledge construction, contextual mathematical reasoning, and meaningful technology-enhanced learning experiences in higher mathematics education.

References

Adeniji, S. M., & Baker, P. (2022). Worked-examples instruction versus Van Hiele teaching phases: A demonstration of students’ procedural and conceptual understanding. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(2), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i2.pp337-356

Aksu, N., & Zengin, Y. (2022). Disclosure of students’ mathematical reasoning through collaborative technology-enhanced learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1609–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10686-x

Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2023). Student-content interactions: Exploring behavioural engagement with self-regulated inquiry-based online learning modules. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00221-x

Alhazmi, K. (2024). The effect of multimedia on vocabulary learning and retention. World Journal of English Language, 14, 390. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p390

AlShaikh, R., Al-Malki, N., & Almasre, M. (2024). The implementation of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning in the design and evaluation of an AI educational video assistant utilizing large language models. Heliyon, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25361

Arici, F., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2025). Effects of augmented reality and video-based learning in inquiry-based science education on academic achievement and motivation to learn science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(5), e70128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70128

Atkinson, A., Bell, P., De La Rosa, I., DeGeorge, T., Jonassen, L., Kokil, V., Lee, S., Malloy, M., Pinzon, K., Robertson, C., Savage, J. C., Shahbaz, R., Villanueva, O., Wludyga, J., & Morris, J. (2024). Student-created videos in online STEM education: A large, interdisciplinary, randomized control study. Discover Education, 3(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00283-8

Bahari, A., Wu, S., & Ayres, P. (2023). Improving computer-assisted language learning through the lens of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09764-y

Bassachs, M., Cañabate, D., Nogué, L., Serra, T., Bubnys, R., & Colomer, J. (2020). Fostering critical reflection in primary education through STEAM approaches. Education Sciences, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120384

Bautista, G., Cacuyong, R., Lavicza, Z., Sabitzer, B., & Emara, M. (2026). Function art: Understanding the artistic transformation of mathematical functions through learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9037

Bozkurt, G., & Yiğit Koyunkaya, M. (2022). Supporting prospective mathematics teachers’ planning and teaching technology-based tasks in the context of a practicum course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 119, 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103830

Braithwaite, D. W., & Sprague, L. (2021). Conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and metacognition in routine and nonroutine problem solving. Cognitive Science, 45(10), e13048. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13048

Çakıroğlu, Ü., Güler, M., Dündar, M., & Coşkun, F. (2024). Virtual reality in realistic mathematics education to develop mathematical literacy skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(17), 4661–4673. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2219960

Chen, C., Rabu, S. N. A., & Jamiat, N. (2025). Enhancing physics learning achievement, motivation and inquiry skills in a flipped classroom: A structured inquiry-based virtual lab approach. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.37

Choi, K. M., Mun, J., & Hand, B. (2026). Bridging reasoning in mathematics and science: A document analysis of applying and reasoning in the TIMSS assessment framework and the case for utilization of resources. Educational Psychology Review, 38(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10115-2

Demir, F. (2023). The relationship between active participation in mathematics classes and motivational regulation and critical thinking disposition.

Elliot, L., Gehret, A., Valadez, M. S., Carpenter, R., & Bryant, L. (2020). Supporting autonomous learning skills in developmental mathematics courses with asynchronous online resources. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(7), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220919149

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). What works and doesn’t work with instructional video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.015

Fiorella, L., Stull, A. T., Kuhlmann, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). Fostering generative learning from video lessons: Benefits of instructor-generated drawings and learner-generated explanations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000408

Fitriati, F., Rosli, R., & Iksan, Z. H. (2023). Enhancing prospective mathematics teachers’ lesson planning skills through lesson study within school university partnership program. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp69-84

Fitzgerald, M. S., & Evans, K. B. (2024). Integrating digital tools to enhance access to learning opportunities in project-based science instruction. TechTrends, 68(5), 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00975-w

Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2022). Improving instructional video design: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7296

Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM, 47(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1

Georgiou, A., Kotakis, S., Loukidis, D., & Ioannou, I. (2023). Case study of seismic assessment of a short irregular historic reinforced concrete structure: Time-history vs. pushover nonlinear methods. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 27(16), 4761–4785. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2023.2193652

Grotlüschen, A., Desjardins, R., & Liu, H. (2020). Literacy and numeracy: Global and comparative perspectives. International Review of Education, 66(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09854-x

Guruloo, T. N. M., Osman, K., & Tan, S. Y. (2026). Enhancing rural students’ science process skills through structured inquiry engagement in a non-immersive virtual reality chemistry laboratory. Pedagogical Research, 11(3), em0269. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/18771

Henderson, M. L., & Schroeder, N. L. (2021). A systematic review of instructor presence in instructional videos: Effects on learning and affect. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100059

Huang, H.-W., Mills, D. J., & Tiangco, J. A. N. Z. (2024). Inquiry-based learning and technology-enhanced formative assessment in flipped EFL writing instruction: Student performance and perceptions. SAGE Open, 14(2), 21582440241236663. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241236663

Huang, M. C.-L., Chou, C.-Y., Wu, Y.-T., Shih, J.-L., Yeh, C. Y. C., Lao, A. C. C., Fong, H., Lin, Y.-F., & Chan, T.-W. (2020). Interest-driven video creation for learning mathematics. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(3), 395–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00161-w

Huang, T.-C., Chou, Y.-Y., Gao, Z.-Q., & Shu, Y. (2025). Exploring the effects of the 6E instructional model on learners’ metacognitive behaviors in 3D modeling. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 35(5), 1965–1997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-025-09972-3

Jäder, J., & Johansson, H. (2025). Exploring students’ conceptual understanding through mathematical problem solving: Students’ use of and shift between different representations of rational numbers. Research in Mathematics Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2025.2456840

Joswick, C., & Hulings, M. (2024). A systematic review of BSCS 5E instructional model evidence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10357-y

Kalaam, R. N. A., & Alex, J. K. (2026). Student readiness for TIMSS through the lens of mathematical proficiency: Evaluation of an instructional initiative for grades 5–8 in the UAE. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), em2767. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/17759

Karakoc, G., Alacaci, C., & Ayas, A. (2025). A strategy to engage students in inquiry-based learning of mathematics: Predict, observe and explain. Instructional Science, 53(5), 1195–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09733-8

Khasawneh, E., Hodge-Zickerman, A., York, C. S., Smith, T. J., & Mayall, H. (2023). Examining the effect of inquiry-based learning versus traditional lecture-based learning on students’ achievement in college algebra. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(1), em0724. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12715

Kong, Y. (2021). The role of experiential learning on students’ motivation and classroom engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771272

Korntreff, S., Bach, S., Altieri, M., & Prediger, S. (2026). Can interactive videos enhance understanding of variables as generalizers? Randomized controlled trial on engagement effects. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-026-09973-8

Köse, E., Taşlıbeyaz, E., & Karaman, S. (2021). Classification of instructional videos. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1079–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09530-5

Kumazah, V., & Agyei, D. D. (2026). From classroom to long-term results: The impact of inquiry-based teaching on student achievement and retention in geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 24(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-025-10640-0

Le, H. V., & Nguyen, L. Q. (2024). Promoting L2 learners’ critical thinking skills: The role of social constructivism in reading class. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1241973

Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Developing a flipped learning approach to support student engagement: A design-based research of secondary school mathematics teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12474

Mang, H. M. A., Chu, H.-E., Martin, S. N., & Kim, C.-J. (2021). An SSI-based STEAM approach to developing science programs. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(2), 549–585. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10036

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6

Mei, Z., & Azid, N. (2026). An empirical analysis of case-based teaching in e-commerce education: Effects on learning motivation, classroom engagement, and career cognition among vocational students. International Journal of Special Education, 41(3s), 721–741.

Mekonnen, Z. B., Yehualaw, D. D., Mengistie, S. M., & Mersha, B. S. (2024). The effect of 7E learning cycle enriched with computer animations on students’ conceptual understanding and overcoming misconceptions. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425017

Mokgwathi, M. S. (2026). Closing the gap in early mathematics: Domain and cognitive insights from TIMSS 2023 in South Africa and Singapore. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.172015.3

Ng, D. T. K., Luo, W., Chan, H. M. Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using digital story writing as a pedagogy to develop AI literacy among primary students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100054

Nga, N. T., Dung, T. M., Trung, L. T. B. T., Nguyen, T.-T., Tong, D. H., Van, T. Q., & Uyen, B. P. (2023). The effectiveness of teaching derivatives in Vietnamese high schools using APOS theory and ACE learning cycle. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.507

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. PISA. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Pan, Y., Wang, L., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Strategic questioning for formative assessment in TEFL: Insights from blended synchronous learning environments. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1519. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04086-y

Photo, P. (2025). Teaching experiences connected to the implementation of inquiry-based practical work in primary science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 55(6), 1493–1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10235-3

Polat, H. (2023). Instructors’ presence in instructional videos: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8537–8569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11532-4

Pratiwi, S. A., Peni, N. R. N., & Prabowo, A. (2024). Study on literacy numeracy towards students’ logic mathematics: A literature review. Numeracy, 11(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v11i1.2601

Riffert, F., Hagenauer, G., Kriegseisen, J., & Strahl, A. (2021). On the impact of learning cycle teaching on Austrian high school students’ emotions, academic self-concept, engagement, and achievement. Research in Science Education, 51(6), 1481–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09918-w

Ruf, V., Küchemann, S., Kuhn, J., & Klein, P. (2022). Comparison of written and spoken instruction to foster coordination between diagram and equation in undergraduate physics education. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022(1), 5860936. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5860936

Sakurai, J., & Goos, M. (2023). Revisiting tools in numeracy learning: The role of authentic digital tools. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1291407

Sen, C., Ay, Z. S., & Güler, G. (2021). The effectiveness of inquiry-based learning on middle school students’ mathematics reasoning skill. Athens Journal of Education, 8(4), 417–440. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.8-4-5

Seprie, Wuryandani, W., & Muthmainah. (2025). Transforming primary education: Balancing social skills and academic achievement through global inquiry-based learning models. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1512274

Shé, C. N., Fhloinn, E. N., & Bhaird, C. M. an. (2023). Student engagement with technology-enhanced resources in mathematics in higher education: A review. Mathematics, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030787

Shen, Y. (2024). Examining the efficacies of instructor-designed instructional videos in flipped classrooms on student engagement and learning outcomes: An empirical study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1791–1805. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12987

Sofroniou, A. (2025). Advancing conceptual understanding: A meta-analysis on the impact of digital technologies in higher education mathematics. Education Sciences, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111544

St Omer, S. M., Evers, K., Wang, C.-Y., & Chen, S. (2025). Technology-enhanced mathematics learning: Review of the interactions between technological attributes and aspects of mathematics education from 2013 to 2022. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1079. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05475-7

Stacey, K. (2015). The international assessment of mathematical literacy: PISA 2012 framework and items. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 771–790). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_43

Staneviciene, E., & Žekienė, G. (2025). The use of multimedia in the teaching and learning process of higher education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 17(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198859

Torres-Peña, R. C., Peña-González, D., Lara-Orozco, J. L., Ariza, E. A., & Vergara, D. (2025). Enhancing numerical thinking through problem solving: A teaching experience for third-grade mathematics. Education Sciences, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060667

Trenholm, S. (2022). Media effects accompanying the use of recorded lecture videos in undergraduate mathematics instruction. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 3015–3043. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1930221

Uddin, M. M., Chew, R. S. Y., Mc Neill, L., Islam, M. N., Awoyemi, I., & Sharmin, T. (2024). Infusing cognitivist and constructivist practices in teaching American plays to develop students’ critical thinking skills. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum, 32(1), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7963/CGP/v32i01/165-192

Varoglu, L., Yilmaz, A., & Sen, S. (2023). Effect of 5E learning cycle assisted with concept maps on conceptual understanding. Pedagogical Research, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13167

Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Andersen, N. H., Espenes, T. C., Søyland, T. B., Wallin, P., & Reams, J. (2020). Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education: Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797

Wei, X., Cheng, I.-L., Chen, N.-S., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Zhai, X., & Kinshuk. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x

Wu, Y., Kanji, M., & Ou, G. (2025). From socialization to internalization: Tracing knowledge co-construction through sequential discourse interaction acts in high school English learning. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1664093

Xu, X., Broadbent, J., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Cultivating mathematical mindset via online video interventions: A mixed-methods investigation in Chinese higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1494702

Yap, J. B. K., & Wong, S. S. H. (2024). Deliberately making and correcting errors in mathematical problem-solving practice improves procedural transfer to more complex problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(7), 1112–1128. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000850

Young, J. R. (2023). The role of technology in enhancing urban mathematics education. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 16(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v16i2a589

Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether ChatGPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712

Zaitoun, E., Shana, Z., Shater, A., Naser, K., & Mukattash, Z. (2023). Does flipping the classroom with videos and notetaking promote high school students’ performance in mathematics? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2274. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13200

Zengin, Y. (2023). Students’ understanding of parametric equations in a collaborative technology-enhanced learning environment. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(5), 740–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1966848